Are you happy with your haplogroups?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel

Of course this affects brain, and everything, becasue in this
chromosome are all differences between mens and women.

Btw, women also are getting their identity form their fathers.

Egg is neutral, like a soil in which seed is planted.
Wheet is not realte to the soil, but to another grain.
If it would be growed on the same field with kraut, it
doesn;t make it closer relate with kraut, does it?

Btw people gets more genetic data from spermatozoon,
something close to 60%, and sperm is influenced female
behavior/genetic - maybe this is the reason, why these
who are sleeping with many guys are more psychos...

---

Yeah.

https://www.crossed-flag-pins.com/Fr...in-Ireland.jpg

arriba arriba!!!!

greatest haplogroup of all, then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel

Of course, because they belonged to this guy, who is married to my daughter.
They are his sons, not mine. Would you wish, that some strange guy have
something to your children (even if this is your father-in-law)?

---

You are extremely degenerate.

For Ydna was surprised. Its not a very common haplogroup for my ethnicity / demographic
I wouldn't say happy though. Was just expecting some overly Common R1b or R1a boring haplogroup so I was surprised with it

But MTDNA wise im glad about it but I expected something along those lines

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Annie999

I onnly know my female halagroup (H1e), I'm very curious to know my YDNA, it comes from north italy, wonder what it could be.

---

you're cute

The same of course my sisters by paternal uncle are closer to me,
than childrens of my aunts... In old polish such sibligs were called
even (there is no terms in english enaugh) bornish, the same as
normal siblings, and there was no big difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longbowman

You are extremely degenerate.

---

:picard1:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel

:picard1:

---

'My daughters are property I will give to someone else and then they can do whatever they want with her.'

Of course the reality is that it is 2016 and your daughters, if you ever have any, will simply disobey you, but ho hum, still degenerate for not caring about family.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longbowman

'My daughters are property I will give to someone else and then they can do whatever they want with her.'

---

Where did you read it in my posts?

Quote:

---

Of course the reality is that it is 2016 and your daughters, if you ever have any, will simply disobey you, but ho hum, still degenerate for not caring about family.

---

You have so low IQ, that you cant distinguished "close people" from "kinsmen".

Kinsman doesnt have to be close to you, but close person can not be even
realted to you. It can be for example taken for raising, becasue has no relatives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mater_semper_certa_est

I wonder what Rethel thinks of this concept...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Longbowman

Of course the reality is that it is 2016

---

And you are a member of people who still belive in jins in the
basement and descriminate people who had not cosher parent... :picard2:

Quote:

---

will simply disobey you

---

If they will disobey me, why do you care about their children? :picard1: