Always had a feeling I would plot within the Northwestern quadrant of the PCA chart... nonetheless good work on the samples! :thumb001:
Printable View
Always had a feeling I would plot within the Northwestern quadrant of the PCA chart... nonetheless good work on the samples! :thumb001:
I used median values for some populations due to sample outliers that can affect the average values. If you add samples outside of Europe such as the middle east , then we will need to increase the resolution to make the text visible for the subjects that are positioned closer to each other . Update (3200x1800 resolution): http://postimg.org/image/ljjmq94er/full/
There is one thing that might need to be fixed. Is that ASE is going to nudge people a little more North than they should be, due to who has the highest scores. So it might be an idea to find someone or a group that can correct it. But it will only makes a small difference.
ANE I think is pulling a bit too hard also.
ASE is in the range of 0-3.37
WHG 10.1-80.23
ENF f 0-80.33
ANE 6.66 – 21.92
The admixture proportions that have the largest ranges will dominate two principal components that we plot the most . Because there is a higher variation in WHG values. So, in the northern direction it will be the WHG admixture component, while ASE won't make much difference. Larger ANE admixture component pulls members in the north-eastern direction. Let's say among members who have higher WHG proportion those who also have higher
What population would be down of my position in the map?
Graham I removed the ASE component from data and generated the plot. See if you can find much difference it has made to north-south gradient : http://postimg.org/image/ih8olhit9/full/
I'd leave ASE as it is.
Interesting redo. I notice there's a cluster of people south of me and if I'm reading this right, Graham's to the northwest.