England_LIA / Denmark_EarlyViking
Attachment 143776
Printable View
England_LIA / Denmark_EarlyViking
Attachment 143776
England_MIA / Norway_IA
Attachment 144061
Attachment 144062
Attachment 144063
Attachment 144064
Playing around with the reference pops and managed to get the P value up slightly
Attachment 144078
Attachment 144077
Here's what I get:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier727
Attachment 144065
Attachment 144066
Attachment 144067
Attachment 144068
I haven't tried it with your references.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Yeah, you should try it out when you get a chance, I’d be interested to see what you get.
this is what I get when using your NW populations as a source combined with Russia Sunghir, which seems to me to be one of the best proxies for Slavs
https://i.postimg.cc/wvnfCNY0/image.png
With your references:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier727
Attachment 144086
With the additional references, it does not improve the p value for me.
Attachment 144087
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Interesting, that’s quite a solid amount of Germanic you’ve got there, how much do you normally get with these IA models.
A guy from Russia ran my Ancestry kit.
Models that passed
https://i.postimg.cc/5HLD7gVg/IMG-20...103802-054.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/NymZJDcC/IMG-20...103807-159.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/CZk9P7g2/IMG-20...103816-345.jpg
Models with Thracian and Illyrian sources failed, only the Glinoe Scythian, which he said is actually Dacian worked.
It varies based on the samples used:Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier727
Attachment 144105
Attachment 144106
Attachment 144107
Attachment 144108
Not really sure that in most cases qpAdm can reliably distinguish between Celtic and Germanic populations.
I can model myself with just Celtic sources also:
Attachment 144109
Attachment 144110
Attachment 144111
Attachment 144112
Attachment 144113
And then Modeling with just Germanic sources:
Attachment 144114
Attachment 144115
Attachment 144116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Yeah, I've noticed that as well, which is interesting given how people always say how much better qpAdm is to G25. Also, it seems that your choice of right populations can have quite a big impact on your results, which is annoying given that there doesn't seem to be any clear formula on what makes for an optimal reference set.