Only NO8 has more "Finnish" than you. ;)
Printable View
Only NO8 has more "Finnish" than you. ;)
Also a few of the Swedes have higher "Finnish" values than me,
what I find interesting is that SE8 and myself are the only Scandinavians with no "Russian".
edit* I believe NO8 have some Swedish ancestry, wich could explain his higher Finnish score.
Without overstretching things (this is just a test calculation and one could use other values I guess) I would associate a "Baltic and Russian" contribution with R1a carriers and probably even Indo-Europeans, in any case more Eastern and South Eastern influences.
I just wonder how the results would look, if a South Eastern component would be included, because now that ("Neolithic"/Near Eastern) component might be distributed among the 4 used components in a specific way...
Britons show more Finn than the French, Germans, Hungarians, and Poles.
Well, R1a1 dispersed some IE languages (e.g., Indo-Iranian and Balto-Slavic). I think the Near Eastern is more likely or much a subset of Russian for this run. The Baltic shows a stronger Northeast gradient.
The "Neolithic belt" and surrounds at K=8
Polako included mainly Southern Europeans (among Europeans) in this run. I was included, too:
There is a major difference between me and modern Southern Europeans - I do not have any North African and Middle Eastern, whereas they seem to have sizeable portions of it.Code:East Eurasian 0.02405
European + Anatolian 0.884999
North African 0.00001
South Asian 0.067035
Middle Eastern 0.00001
West Central African 0.015725
East African 0.00001
West African 0.008161
Hello, I'm NO8 in the Eurogenes-project. He accepted my raw-data not too long ago. ;)
Well, as far as I know, I do not have any considerable ancestry from Sweden, but some of my most recent ancestors came from eastern Norway not far from the Swedish border, so who knows? I should perhaps do some deeper investigation into my genealogy.
That's interesting. What associations do you get regarding the "Finnish" and "Western-European" used in this analysis?
Well, Western European could be a combination of Atlantic + Western Neolithic probably and Finnish should be North Eastern Mesolithic + Uralic.Quote:
That's interesting. What associations do you get regarding the "Finnish" and "Western-European" used in this analysis?
But that is just my personal impression :)
:thumbs up
My bad, it was evon from abf who listed you as swe/no on ABF in this graph he made:
http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/sho...postcount=3512
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/4...0416131534.jpg