Quote:
No, Avars were in Northern Caucasus after northern India and western Turkistan, they were of Hunnic origin called White Huns, then they migrated to deep Europe and set an empire there. That is a fact and there is full evidence related to that including the genetics. What you claim sounds like Greeks were never present in Land of Kipchak or Persians were never present in Central Asia. So you believe that they had settled (though not in big numbers as Avars did in Europe) in those lands but Avars did not migrate and not settled in Europe, especially governed Slavics? Contradictory. I know you are Russian and its difficult to accept it as a IE theory supporter but there is enough proof that contemporary and early Avars are one and same although the former surely mixed with the locals (who were of Sarmatian origin). Thats why the y-haplogroup of Avar males is predominantly J1, after Sarmatian origins, with less R1 and mt-haplogroups are H, U and K5 and our test results reflect higher northern European components. I have even far-cousins from Icelanders from mt-DNA
I think you are confusing something here. You are talking about Pannonian Avars, Turkic or Eruasian group not related to Caucasian Avars, who untill relatively recently weren't called Avars at all.
As a follow up: