We are indigenous. Dark skin, blue eyes, and big packages. Our women had big asses hence why the R1B/R1A savages took them.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
Printable View
We are indigenous. Dark skin, blue eyes, and big packages. Our women had big asses hence why the R1B/R1A savages took them.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
The savages took our women as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Indo-European women must of been fugly man; they took Indian women, and big booty paleo european women.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
The EEF women were babes but stay away from those Hunter Gatherer women and their big brow ridge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
They took over everything from Europe all the way down to central Asia going into South Asia, even going into west Asia and Siberia. These fuxxers had absolutely no life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
I've seen quite a few white women with nice asses! I'd say they're underrated. Either way regardless if the first europeans are african or not they did interbreed with the neanderthals, which likely gave them fair features to begin with do to the lack of amount of time to adapt such features, as well as such things as the occipital bun, elongated head, larger eyes, a prominent brow, etc.... that & 40,000 years of divergence. So NO my ancestors were not blackQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
(unless some black slaves from the Maghrebi caliphates took some to Spain that bred with my other ancestors)
but that pretty much the only way how it could've happened, if it did.
I mean pretty much everyone took hunter gatherer women so they can't of been that bad; they were probably thick as fuck but archaic. Ronda Rousey with a Kim Karshashian ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daco Celtic
women with a bit of a brow ridge can look good, just depends on if her other features complement the face's over arching geometry!Quote:
Originally Posted by Daco Celtic
Are you R1a brother? Are you one of "them".Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
Yeah, you might have to put a bag over their head but nice body.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Let's be real, everyone living around that time was probably ugly as f_ck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daco Celtic
...yesQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Lol...no doubtQuote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
Indo European. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NNVrmW0VL2I/hqdefault.jpg
Western Hunter Gatherer https://images.sk-static.com/images/...29/huge_avatar
Neolithic farmer https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...c6f30bfa589cc7
Did you switch the hunter gatherer and EEF by mistake?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Hunter Gatherer gedmatch (ancient Norway) :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
# Population Percent
1 North_Sea 34.27
2 Baltic 31.01
3 Eastern_Euro 30.34
4 Amerindian 4.31
5 Atlantic 0.07
Doesn't mean anything when it comes to looks when you talk about ancients.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
Neither the hunter-gatherers nor the EEF looked like that Ethiopian looking guy, the Hunter gatherers looked more like modern whites with dark tan (indian shaded perhaps) skin, & the EEF looked like tanner Sardinians. It was the ANE (ancient north Eurasians) that likely looked like image 2Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
It had light skin snp's and blue eye snps. only the first early settlers were "dark skin" late ones would of been white and blonde.Quote:
Originally Posted by Basilisk
Only early Hunter Gatherers were tan skin; later ones had SNP's for blonde hair, light skin, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
From the genetic studies I've seen, the EEF were likely at least Olive skin toned with dark hair & eyes like Mediterraneans (which makes sense do to their Anatolian & Levantine ancestryQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayetooey
They would of been the "darkest" of the three by far. Indo Europeans were pale skinned, and late hunter gatherers who had adjusted to the climate were mainly blonde and white. Modern Sardinians have elevated EEF, but are heavily hunter gatherer in Y dna (i2a1a).Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
This is not really what the data say: Hunter Gatherer lacks a light skin gene, unlike the Early European Farmer who had this gene. This does not mean that the Early European Farmer had no people in their population who had a more tanned skin color or conversely, a lighter skin color ... Same for Hunther Gatherer: no one said they had black skin, but it's assumed they have more darker skin than Early European Farmer for the reason i mentioned above.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOldNorth
On this site we can see the pigmentation of England N (Neolithic):
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/pigmentation/
Which one am I if I'm I2/I-M438 and my subclade is I-Z17855?
I2a1Quote:
Originally Posted by arkas
O.M.G my ancestor in the Roman legion!
http://solarey.net/wp-content/upload...omans-00-1.jpg
R1b-L21. Don't want to post the specific subclade as for some reason, googling it actually links back to my family surname lol.
R1a-M417 (most likely)
Why most likely? Did you do a DNA Test?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyp Snow
I did the MorleyDNA.com Predictor. Other users said it's pretty accurate for telling the main Hg. I'm aware that it doesn't mean anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ediction/page9
That's just a surname, probably at least couple of dozens of people (at least) carries it anyway so that's not really a privacy breach.Quote:
Originally Posted by farke1
E-M293 introduced by South Cushitic pastoralists
R1a1a1a-L664
https://i.imgur.com/b8hAshR.png
From AncestryDNA raw data using https://ytree.morleydna.com/extractFromAutosomal
_______
https://i.imgur.com/MvSdLut.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/QKEK0PN.jpg
_______
Paper trail of direct paternal line goes to 1754 in Södermanland.
https://i.imgur.com/jjjxLOO.png
I have heard that I belong to G1. Y-dna.
R1b > R-M173 > R-M343 > R-M269 > R-L47 > R-Z159
Anyone else have R-Z159 by chance?
Apparently it's common in the Frisian, German, and Danish populations, and it was brought over to England by invading Angles, Saxons, and Jutes.
What does this mean?
http://prntscr.com/p6xd3t
I am an E-V13 nigga
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morlak
yes we are...
My Y haplo is R1b-cts1751.. Anyone that has this or understands the point of origin of it, time frame for it , holla!
R1aryan, bruh. lol....