Genética de españoles e hispanoamericanos

Ya veo que andan en ello.

Miren, es sencillo, en mi opinion personal hay que crear un Basque, West y East Iberia.

Basque Iberia: Todas las muestras francesas y españolas vascas, junto con la de Navarra.

West: Galicia, Portugal, CyL, Asturias y Extremadura.

East: Todas las muestras catalanas, balears, valencianas, Murcia, Aragon.

El resto se podria hacer algo parecido al Basque, como un South Iberia y un Central.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocinante

0.03707585 PseudoAlejandro3

Ni tan cerca eh? Pero oye, esta bastante buena la idea de crear averages. A ver si se crean porfin un average castellano unico, y lo mismo con las 1526mil muestras catalanas.

---

Pero son clavados no?
Target: Alejandro_scaled
Distance: 1.6882% / 0.01688223
52.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
33.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.4 MAR_Taforalt
0.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N

Target: PseudoAlejandro3
Distance: 1.7619% / 0.01761926
54.2 Anatolia_Barcin_N
32.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.0 MAR_Taforalt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spaniard 2.0

Pero son clavados no?
Target: Alejandro_scaled
Distance: 1.6882% / 0.01688223
52.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
33.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.4 MAR_Taforalt
0.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N

Target: PseudoAlejandro3
Distance: 1.7619% / 0.01761926
54.2 Anatolia_Barcin_N
32.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.0 MAR_Taforalt

---

Sí, se puede representar bastante bien a una persona con los promedios. Esto es bueno para saber si las coordenadas disponibles en las hojas de datos son fiables.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocinante

No podrias hacer un Galica + Galicia + Asturias + Sicilian East? Que en realidad mi parte italiana es del Este de Sicilia

---

A ver si te sirve alguno Celti

Code:

---

Pseudo_Rocinante1,0.105855,0.144882,0.025770,-0.039729,0.102172,-0.020359,-0.003760,-0.000231,0.019975,0.026121,-0.001029,0.008492,-0.006541,-0.011881,0.007329,-0.001989,-0.004303,-0.001900,-0.003519,-0.007087,0.001040,-0.000742,0.000904,-0.000924,-0.003552
Pseudo_Rocinante2,0.104952,0.143528,0.032307,-0.022933,0.071705,-0.009622,-0.001763,0.001731,0.025020,0.027366,-0.003194,0.009117,-0.008920,-0.011239,0.010586,-0.005503,-0.008475,-0.000697,-0.003582,-0.010234,-0.000354,-0.003030,0.002301,-0.003414,-0.005309
Pseudo_Rocinante3,0.107563,0.145052,0.035135,-0.017765,0.072475,-0.012690,-0.002115,-0.002769,0.020623,0.025726,-0.003844,0.010166,-0.006913,-0.019084,0.008415,0.004906,0.005476,-0.003927,-0.007353,-0.004544,0.004264,-0.002041,-0.000041,-0.001185,-0.002194

---

Edit:no cambia gran cosa, pero dupliqué al copiar una de las coordenadas, pongo la real.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spaniard 2.0

Pero son clavados no?
Target: Alejandro_scaled
Distance: 1.6882% / 0.01688223
52.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
33.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.4 MAR_Taforalt
0.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N

Target: PseudoAlejandro3
Distance: 1.7619% / 0.01761926
54.2 Anatolia_Barcin_N
32.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.0 MAR_Taforalt

---

Joder, si esos resultados son de Celti, mis samples no le van a servir, yo hice tres diferentes con lo que él dijo...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spaniard 2.0

Pero son clavados no?
Target: Alejandro_scaled
Distance: 1.6882% / 0.01688223
52.6 Anatolia_Barcin_N
33.2 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.4 MAR_Taforalt
0.4 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N

Target: PseudoAlejandro3
Distance: 1.7619% / 0.01761926
54.2 Anatolia_Barcin_N
32.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
8.4 WHG
5.0 MAR_Taforalt

---

Son muy parecidos, hay bastante equilibrio en los componentes de ese modelo. La verdad es que soy lo que soy, indudablemente.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gixajo

A ver si te sirve alguno Celti

Code:

---

Pseudo_Rocinante1,0.105855,0.144882,0.025770,-0.039729,0.102172,-0.020359,-0.003760,-0.000231,0.019975,0.026121,-0.001029,0.008492,-0.006541,-0.011881,0.007329,-0.001989,-0.004303,-0.001900,-0.003519,-0.007087,0.001040,-0.000742,0.000904,-0.000924,-0.003552
Pseudo_Rocinante2,0.104952,0.143528,0.032307,-0.022933,0.071705,-0.009622,-0.001763,0.001731,0.025020,0.027366,-0.003194,0.009117,-0.008920,-0.011239,0.010586,-0.005503,-0.008475,-0.000697,-0.003582,-0.010234,-0.000354,-0.003030,0.002301,-0.003414,-0.005309
Pseudo_Rocinante3,0.107563,0.145052,0.035135,-0.017765,0.072475,-0.012690,-0.002115,-0.002769,0.020623,0.025726,-0.003844,0.010166,-0.006913,-0.019084,0.008415,0.004906,0.005476,-0.003927,-0.007353,-0.004544,0.004264,-0.002041,-0.000041,-0.001185,-0.002194

---

Edit:no cambia gran cosa, pero dupliqué al copiar una de las coordenadas, pongo la real.

---

Distance to: A_scaled
0.04954685 Pseudo_Rocinante3
0.05719167 Pseudo_Rocinante2
0.08418945 Pseudo_Rocinante1

El 1 y el 2 estan lejos, el 3 es el mejor, indudablemente. Esto confirma lo que soy, ni mas ni menos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocinante

Son muy parecidos, hay bastante equilibrio en los componentes de ese modelo. La verdad es que soy lo que soy, indudablemente.



Distance to: A_scaled
0.04954685 Pseudo_Rocinante3
0.05719167 Pseudo_Rocinante2
0.08418945 Pseudo_Rocinante1

El 1 y el 2 estan lejos, el 3 es el mejor, indudablemente. Esto confirma lo que soy, ni mas ni menos.

---

No ví muestra asturiana, el primero es Galicia+Castilla león+Sicilia Este, el segundo Galicia+Castilla león+Castilla León+Sicilia y el tercero Galicia+Galicia+Castilla León+Sicilia Este.

En tu modelo antiguo daban los tres distancias bastante altas igualmente. Los samples son del modern averages , si eso, mira que samples te dan menos distancia , y podemos hacer uno promedio con ellos. Yo cogí al azar cada sample, voy a ciegas.

Mi primer promedio con antiguos, pensé que este iba a ser un pastiche redundante pero ojo cuidao:

Target: Steppe+WHG+EEF
Distance: 0.7733% / 0.00773267
35.4 WHG
32.0 Anatolia_Barcin_N
27.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
3.6 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
1.0 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps
0.4 BRA_LapaDoSanto_9600BP
0.2 Han

Code:

---

Steppe+WHG+EEF,0.12165857,0.127967,0.07738327,0.0661003,0.0595527,0.01915563,0.00648537,0.00883347,0.02425683,0.00863133,-0.00214833,-0.00142417,-0.00306663,-0.01096033,0.0162168,0.02430933,0.00761983,0.00188223,0.00047753,0.0191825,0.02755773,0.005762,-0.01379043,-0.04935753,0.00346643

---

Target: Juan_scaled
Distance: 12.6869% / 0.12686860
100.0 Steppe+WHG+EEF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocinante

Ya veo que andan en ello.

Miren, es sencillo, en mi opinion personal hay que crear un Basque, West y East Iberia.

Basque Iberia: Todas las muestras francesas y españolas vascas, junto con la de Navarra.

West: Galicia, Portugal, CyL, Asturias y Extremadura.

East: Todas las muestras catalanas, balears, valencianas, Murcia, Aragon.

El resto se podria hacer algo parecido al Basque, como un South Iberia y un Central.

---

Sí, esa es la idea, aunque sería mejor varias muestras de cada zona. pero hay zonas como Andalucía que entran tanto en Western como en Eastern Iberia, y no me suena que los samples estén por provincias.Un solo sample Ibérico no va a contentar a nadie, y uno solo Western_iberia, o Eastern_Iberia, tampoco.

Mejor scaled que unescaled?

Mejor individuales o averages?

Que os sale?

Spanish_Pirineu:GRA029,0.126344,0.146236,0.041106, 0.005491,0.044316,0,-0.00047,0.005077,0.01718,0.033167,-0.004709,0.014687,-0.017839,-0.009634,0.005157,-0.000928,-0.003781,-0.001774,-0.001634,-0.003877,0.004118,0.008037,-0.002342,-0.000241,0.00012
Berber,-0.1025221,0.131656,-0.0023166,-0.0759511,0.0310606,-0.0356582,-0.0335058,0.012016,0.0766524,0.0315659,0.0088154,-0.0092596,0.0247308,-0.0204174,0.0203483,-0.0157212,0.0001119,-0.0288305,-0.0534217,0.0119165,-0.0208205,-0.0511129,0.0307414,-0.0051899,0.0074671


Target: Xabier_scaled
Distance: 2.7523% / 0.02752307
94.4 Spanish_Pirineu
5.6 Berber