What state in the USA has the least diluted White Americans?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PaleoEuropean

I would say the entire midwest and West coast really. The only people I imagine have any black are people from L.A that marry into mixed Asian and Latino families. Almost all my matches are 100% white, very few people with black and the ones that have black are obviously recently mixed and look more afro than Caucasoid. The only thing I ever see is Balkan and South European which isn't really mixed.

---

Oh weird, almost all of mine are 0.1-1% black or native, and sometimes jew. A lot of them are from the south. It's putting the idea in my head think most White americans are part non-white. People east of the Mississippi river have a lot less native ancestry. And I know it isnt from my bloodlines, for example, my first cousin is 2% black and 0.5& native, obviously not from my father

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PaleoEuropean

I would say the entire midwest and West coast really. The only people I imagine have any black are people from L.A that marry into mixed Asian and Latino families. Almost all my matches are 100% white, very few people with black and the ones that have black are obviously recently mixed and look more afro than Caucasoid. The only thing I ever see is Balkan and South European which isn't really mixed.

---

Oh weird, almost all of mine are 0.1-1% black or native, and sometimes jew. A lot of them are from the south. It's putting the idea in my head think most White americans are part non-white. People east of the Mississippi river have a lot less native ancestry. And I know it isnt from my bloodlines, for example, my first cousin is 2% black and 0.5& native, obviously not from my father

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by disconscious

Oh weird, almost all of mine are 0.1-1% black or native, and sometimes jew. A lot of them are from the south. It's putting the idea in my head think most White americans are part non-white. People east of the Mississippi river have a lot less native ancestry. And I know it isnt from my bloodlines, for example, my first cousin is 2% black and 0.5& native, obviously not from my father

---

You must be from a low class or immigrant family, very uncommon for whites of class to mix with blacks. Only poor people and outcasts mixed with melungeons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PaleoEuropean

You must be from a low class or immigrant family, very uncommon for whites of class to mix with blacks. Only poor people and outcasts mixed with melungeons.

---

Yeah most of my ancestors were upper-class/millionaires. One did fuck a slave in the 1700s, but that was after his wife (my 10th great grandmother) died. Maybe that's why I'm 0% native or black, because my ancestors were usually upper-class. I've always wondered why I seem to be the only one in the South who doesnt have a "cherokee great-grandmother" to make me "exotic". To me, being a mutt like that isnt cool or unique, its just disgusting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by disconscious

Yeah most of my ancestors were upper-class/millionaires. One did fuck a slave in the 1700s, but that was after his wife (my 10th great grandmother) died. Maybe that's why I'm 0% native or black, because my ancestors were usually upper-class. I've always wondered why I seem to be the only one in the South who doesnt have a "cherokee great-grandmother" to make me "exotic". To me, being a mutt like that isnt cool or unique, its just disgusting.

---

Really depends on where in the South, the poorest areas are the most mixed, and the Western places like Arkansas etc are almost never mixed even if they are poor. The deep south like Georgia, Alabama etc had a lot of poor whites and outcasts etc. Poor uneducated people don't care who they breed with which is why there is always more of them. The places where you find the highest concentration of mixed people are the places you also find incest etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by disconscious

Yeah most of my ancestors were upper-class/millionaires. One did fuck a slave in the 1700s, but that was after his wife (my 10th great grandmother) died. Maybe that's why I'm 0% native or black, because my ancestors were usually upper-class. I've always wondered why I seem to be the only one in the South who doesnt have a "cherokee great-grandmother" to make me "exotic". To me, being a mutt like that isnt cool or unique, its just disgusting.

---

I have a lot of ancestry from the Appalachian region and I now live in the southeast. no Indian here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JerryS.

I have a lot of ancestry from the Appalachian region and I now live in the southeast. no Indian here.

---

In Appalachia mixed people are well documented and live in isolated areas, I can't speak for city folk though as they are their own breed. It's very unlikely to have native American or Black in most places where mixed populations exist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PaleoEuropean

Really depends on where in the South, the poorest areas are the most mixed, and the Western places like Arkansas etc are almost never mixed even if they are poor. The deep south like Georgia, Alabama etc had a lot of poor whites and outcasts etc. Poor uneducated people don't care who they breed with which is why there is always more of them. The places where you find the highest concentration of mixed people are the places you also find incest etc.

---

Oh ok, that makes sense. And weird guys who were just looking for a piece of meat and had some weird Indian fetish

The whitest person I've seen in my life was from Alabama, redhair, freckles, ultra pale skin and light blue eyes, then I asked her heritage and she said me it was Irish even tho she wasn't sure. South White Americans usually score some non-white blood on avg, but they still look fully white

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daco Celtic

Esp the Mountain West. If it weren't for Vegas, Nevada would be way up there too.

---

Las Vegas, please. Speak Spanish properly or you will be expelled from California ok?