Target: Kenshiro_Scaled
Distance: 1.3088% / 0.01308788
55.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
32.6 Yamnaya
3.8 ?CausasusHuntherGatherer
3.6 IranianNeolithicFarmer
1.8 Natufian
1.8 WesternHunterGatherer
0.8 Iberomaurusian
Printable View
Target: Kenshiro_Scaled
Distance: 1.3088% / 0.01308788
55.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
32.6 Yamnaya
3.8 ?CausasusHuntherGatherer
3.6 IranianNeolithicFarmer
1.8 Natufian
1.8 WesternHunterGatherer
0.8 Iberomaurusian
Target: gixajo_scaled
Distance: 2.9063% / 0.02906277
54.0 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
32.6 Yamnaya
11.8 WesternHunterGatherer
1.6 Iberomaurusian
Target: gixajo_scaled
Distance: 3.1550% / 0.03155025 | ADC: 0.5x RC
56.0 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
30.6 Yamnaya
13.4 WesternHunterGatherer
Target: Fabricius_K13-G25
Distance: 2.1741% / 0.02174081
45.2 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
32.6 Yamnaya
11.6 WesternHunterGatherer
5.6 SSA
5.0 Iberomaurusian
Target: Fabricius_K15-G25
Distance: 2.2925% / 0.02292547
46.4 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
31.4 Yamnaya
12.0 WesternHunterGatherer
6.4 SSA
3.8 Iberomaurusian
Target: Fabricius_K36-G25
Distance: 2.2804% / 0.02280402
46.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
31.6 Yamnaya
10.2 WesternHunterGatherer
6.6 Iberomaurusian
5.0 SSA
Target: Fabricius_MyHeritage-to-g25(simulated)
Distance: 1.9236% / 0.01923569
45.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
33.4 Yamnaya
9.6 WesternHunterGatherer
6.4 Iberomaurusian
5.0 SSA
Target: CE_scaled
Distance: 2.4381% / 0.02438126
47.4 Yamnaya
44.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
8.0 WesternHunterGatherer
Target: SC_23andMe
Distance: 3.3470% / 0.03346985
53.2 Yamnaya
34.0 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
12.8 WesternHunterGatherer
Target: SC_Ancestry
Distance: 3.1002% / 0.03100188
52.4 Yamnaya
34.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
13.0 WesternHunterGatherer
High Yamnaya there.Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandinavianCelt
Interestingly, Northern Europeans and a Northeast Caucasus guy have high Yamnaya component comparing to Southern Europeans whom Anatolian component is prevalent.
I kind of have a dual understanding of it. At this level, all Northern and Central Europeans are similar. Some slight regional variation is what separates them. If one takes a bigger picture stance, then the slight variation is just noise and that the fundamental point is: These people are connected/related. And then one can take another level above that and see there are common components shared across all of West Eurasia. The Yamnaya have CHG, the Early European farmers have some Natufian for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by black hole
It's why with certain sample selections I can model myself in qpAdm with Near Easterners like Lebanon MBA, Levant Neolithic, and the third Intermediate period Egyptians:
Attachment 145731
Attachment 145735
Attachment 145734
Attachment 145732
Attachment 145733
Target: Lx_g25(scaled)
Distance: 4.4823% / 0.04482296
48.8 Yamnaya
39.2 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
12.0 WesternHunterGatherer
Target: Lx_K36
Distance: 3.5368% / 0.03536800
46.6 Yamnaya
39.6 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
13.8 WesternHunterGatherer
Target: Vessna_scaled
Distance: 5.9100% / 0.05910022
50.6 Yamnaya
30.2 AnatolianNeolithicFarmer
19.2 WesternHunterGatherer