Be fin quando non trovano un altro Oezti allora io ho ragione. :)
Printable View
Be fin quando non trovano un altro Oezti allora io ho ragione. :)
Oetzi was a kind of proto-sardinian.
I voted for it because I wanted to vote for the Pontic Steppe.
Yes, sure... because Germans are living in Ukraine and Kazakhstan and prefer these as an urheimat to places which actually had civilisation such as the Med or Anatolia... :rolleyes:Quote:
You really believe in the para-scientific theories about "german origin of aryan race"...c'mon guys...
Please stop with the conspiracy theories already, it is getting old and you look petty.
Again what I said! You not read my links, fuck, and want to be right and I must read your proofs?
This is the last time I re-link something:
A common ancestor of Indo-European and Hurrian
http://dienekes.blogspot.it/2011/02/...opean-and.html
Poor you, G peaks in IE Ossetians and other groups derived from IE speakers (Kalash) and descendandts of Tocharians (Uyghurs; that could have the maximum frequency in the world).
Read previous pages.
Again, what have Kazakhstan or Central Asia of "eastern Europe"?
Ossetians are just North Caucasians who adopted Indo-Iranian culture and language, silly. :rolleyes:
Tocharians possessing G actually points to the Pontic Steppe and thus R1a theory of IE - G can easily be explained as assimilated North Caucasians that ended up there via the IE nomadic migrations.
What would Neolithic farmers be doing in the barren Tarim? The Tocharians were goat herders!
Stop supposing bullshits and show papers instead. Everything points out that R1a isn't IE, the RgVeda in primis.
Look at the map, I see it is in Northern East Asia too, stop making yourself stupid. You know the eastern ending of the culture comprised most of the Turkic and Mongoloid territory.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...an_origins.png
I don't have one, just use your common sense. :rolleyes2:
R1a is IE, Turkics were latter invaders to Central Asia. You're the one rewriting history here with these fringe theories.Quote:
Stop supposing bullshits and show papers instead. Everything points out that R1a isn't IE, the RgVeda in primis.
Look at the map, I see it is in Northern East Asia too, stop making yourself stupid.
Keep the thread in the good-manner-way...no personal insults, please.
G peaks high in Caucasus because of founder effect Einstein,you forget that G is quite present among Georgians too.Also PIE had only single male lineage not two or more because they were quite patriarchal and didn't include foreign males into their groups.
It is a scretch from Central-East Europe to Western Kazakhstan but the origin is Eastern Europe>Ukrainian steppes.
I wonder if Protospatha is trolling or he just started to have a rebellion connected with adolescence.
There are a lot of people with common sense around the net like me, I'm not alone, in primis with Dienekes.
So could you tell me why there is a low frequency of G and J lineages in most IE populations so far? If the G's and J's were a rulers and a warriors connected with spreading IE languages, why they play so insignificant role in almost every modern European ethnicity.
FFS, now Central Asia is North East Asia just because you say so is it? Mongols and Turks crept into IE territory as they learned horse riding and weaponry from them and refined weapons such as the bow which they'd use against the IEs on the steppes latter on.
I've taken a decision: I won't post in this thread anymore. After all, why do I have to make you know the truth? The right thing is that I know the truth, yes, this is enough:). Bye all! Good dreams!:D
People tend to be very absolute about what were the IE haplogroups...but different families of IE could have belonged to different y-dna. At least this is what I think because neither R1a nor J2 or G can explain were IE languages are spoken today.
It's more wise to trust to many sources and experienced scientists than to one guy who is called a "couch anthropologist".
I'm sorry to hear that you've stopped posting in this thread, this discussion started to look interesting. I hope that you will make a new thread about this to enlighten our minds.
We Sardinians are in majority R1b and I2a (63 or 70 % of population according to different studies) (haplogroup I is one of the most ancient native european haplogroup and it constitutes the 37-40% of Sardinian population)
the G2a constitutes only the 11-15% of population, and it is spread also on the Alps (about 10%) where the Oetzi's mummy was found.
more infos about the g haplogroup distribution in Europe:
Quote:
In Europe west of the Black Sea Haplogroup G is found at about 5% of the population on average throughout most of the continent.[19] The concentration of G falls below this average in Scandinavia, the westernmost former Soviet republics and Poland, as well as in Iceland and the British Isles. There are seeming pockets of unusual concentrations within Europe. In Wales, a distinctive G2a3b1 type (DYS388=13 and DYS594=11) dominates there and pushes the G percentage of the population higher than in England. In western Austria, in the Tirol (Tyrol) the G percentage can reach 8% or more (Otzi also had it). In the northern and highland areas of the island of Sardinia off western Italy, G percentages reach 11% of the population in one study[20] and reached 21% in the town of Tempio in another study. In the Greek island of Crete, approximately 7%[21] to 11%[22] of males belong to haplogroup G. In north-eastern Croatia, in the town of Osijek, G was found in 14% of the males.[23] The city is on the banks of the river Drava, which notably begins in the Tirol/Tyrol region of the Alps, another haplogroup G focus area in Europe. Farther north, 8% of ethnic Hungarian males and 5.1% of ethnic Bohemian (Czech) males have been found to belong to Haplogroup G.