So the only true european in this forum is Mortimer.
Printable View
So the only true european in this forum is Mortimer.
No he fucking is not. Do not trust the Polish propaganda machine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hithaeglir
:rotfl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Valtaves
Kostenki, Ust-Ishim and Oase are the only pure West Eurasian samples.
All others are mixed with East Eurasian (Mal'ta, WHGs) or Basal Eurasian (Stuttgart etc)
https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article...dFrom=fulltext
http://i64.tinypic.com/npigew.jpg
Quote:
After the divergence of Dinka from non-Africans, the next split point on the modern human lineage in our model is that between the major eastern and western clades (the node labeled “Non-African”—although we note that the split point of Basal Eurasian would be deeper.) This split is soon followed on the western Eurasian branch by the split between K14 and Ust’-Ishim (i.e., their respective modern-human ancestry components). The original Ust’-Ishim analysis (Fu et al., 2014) inferred a near-trifurcation at this point, and we wished to test whether K14 (and other western Eurasians) and Ust’-Ishim form a statistically supported clade. In fact, while the best-fitting position for Ust’-Ishim is on the western lineage (0.6 shared drift), the inferred 95% confidence interval for this point overlaps the eastern/western split (standard error 0.4 for the Ust’-Ishim split position), so that we cannot confidently resolve the branching order. We therefore continue to regard this cluster as approximately a trifurcation; while we show Ust’Ishim at its best-fitting split point in Figure 1, we color-code it as a basal non-African rather than a member of the western clade.
lol you fucking idiot. It is obvious you haven't read any literature on Oase. Oase was a massive archaic specimen. It was such a huge bitch (well actually Oase is two different specimen) that it actually fits better metrically with tens of thousands years older specimens. Ridiculous to suggest it had anything to do with Negritos physically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
Not similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
Oase is more bantu/papuan faced.
So it is another evidence, that mongolian C is a founderQuote:
Ancestral South Eurasians were ancestors of:
- Australian Aborigines
- Papuans, Melanesians
- Negrito populations
- South IndiansEtc.
effect, and whole C-D was australoid originaly...
So, assuming, "I" had to be something
beteen Saudis and Australians, but,
but with square face nad more darker
as among hybrids ala natufian skin.
Did I assume correctly?
Is it not amazing, that first and last land, which IEsQuote:
Originally Posted by Litvin
colonized were previously inhabited by Aborigens :)
And in both cases, they were ab-origo indeed.
Oase has nothing to do with Bantus or Papuans. The skull and mandible are Neandethaloid. They looked nothing like Saudis or Australians. C was never Australoid and ancient Europeans have NOTHING to do with Australoids. Haplogroup D in Oceania is a result of a very recent turnover event. Oase 2 has several Mongoloid features.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Rethel of Retheley
I only said, that they look like. Negrito from the photoQuote:
Originally Posted by Grab the Gauge
does not have such flat face and nose and is more round.