Early Indo-Iranians on Gedmatch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pahli

Iranians didn't worship them either, instead they just carried on the legacy, as for Turks, they just learned the culture and ran around East Asia for over a millenia before migrating to Europe. There's no specific evidence that shows Afansievo admixture in Proto-Turks you OWD retard, Afansievo were first of all proto-Tocharians that ended up in the Tarim Basin, and you are the last to be associated with them. Your identification with Tocharians and Gökturks would equal to me claiming Scytho-Sarmatians were the ancestors to Kurds.

Good thing I saved all your brainless comments in my signature, just a reminder of how stupid you actually are :laugh:

---

lmao ran around

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Berkan

What is Bmac?

---

Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Babak

lmao ran around

---

Its so cringe to see some mongrel mix of Laz and Turkmen claim onto Afansievo and other people that are totally unrelated to him, its really fucking cringe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pahli

Iranians didn't worship them either, instead they just carried on the legacy, as for Turks, they just learned the culture and ran around East Asia for over a millenia before migrating to Europe. There's no specific evidence that shows Afansievo admixture in Proto-Turks you OWD retard, Afansievo were first of all proto-Tocharians that ended up in the Tarim Basin, and you are the last to be associated with them. Your identification with Tocharians and Gökturks would equal to me claiming Scytho-Sarmatians were the ancestors of Kurds and Persians.

Good thing I saved all your brainless comments in my signature, just a reminder of how stupid you actually are :laugh:

---

Are you blond, 190cm tall, blue eyed? If not, language you speak doesn't match with your look xD

I didn't claim ancestry from Afanesovan. That's a genetic flow. There is no cultural effect, since Turks didn't assimilate into them like all the mass from Transcaucasus to Sri Lanka did ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Böri

Are you blond, 190cm tall, blue eyed? If not, language you speak doesn't match with your look xD

I didn't claim ancestry from Afanesovan. That's a genetic flow. There is no cultural effect, since Turks didn't assimilate into them like all the mass from Transcaucasus to Sri Lanka did ;)

---

Since when did turks look like gokturks? They were 70% mongoloid for fucks sake.

Early Turks were, in fact, partly Sintashta-derived, so modern Turkics still score a good chunk of early Indo-Iranian ancestry.

Karluk_Medieval
"Scythian_Pazyryk" 42.6
"Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA1" 21.8
"Mongola" 17.05
"Srubnaya_MLBA" 13.55
"Nganassan" 3.75
"Sintashta_MLBA" 1.2
"Yukagir_Tundra" 0.05
"Sarmatian_Pokrovka" 0

Modern Turkmen
"Karluk_Medieval" 54
"Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA1" 21.35
"Sintashta_MLBA" 19.9
"Mongola" 4.7

Modern Turkmens owe around 25% of their genome to early Indo-Iranians, which was probably absorbed by their ancestors from the Scythians.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Böri

Are you blond, 190cm tall, blue eyed? If not, language you speak doesn't match with your look xD

I didn't claim ancestry from Afanesovan. That's a genetic flow. There is no cultural effect, since Turks didn't assimilate into them like all the mass from Transcaucasus to Sri Lanka did ;)

---

There is no genetical flow from Afansiveo to Turks, thats something you claim but cannot backup, no samples or whatsoever.

I am actually 190cm, but no, I don't happen to have light eyes or hair nor do I care, but the same could be applied to you my confused Turkish friend, you are neither fully Mongoloid, nor have any of the features you just listed.

Most of the Turkic genepool in Central Asia is assimilated, you can't deny that. Even Turks of Turkey and especially Azeris are assimilated with almost no genetical contribution from actual Turkic people, instead its a linguistic shift.

The same applies for some Tatars and Chuvash people, assimilated people.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Token

Early Turks were, in fact, partly Sintashta-derived, so modern Turkics still score a good chunk of early Indo-Iranian ancestry.

Karluk_Medieval
"Scythian_Pazyryk" 42.6
"Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA1" 21.8
"Mongola" 17.05
"Srubnaya_MLBA" 13.55
"Nganassan" 3.75
"Sintashta_MLBA" 1.2
"Yukagir_Tundra" 0.05
"Sarmatian_Pokrovka" 0

Modern Turkmen
"Karluk_Medieval" 54
"Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA1" 21.35
"Sintashta_MLBA" 19.9
"Mongola" 4.7

Modern Turkmens owe around 25% of their genome to early Indo-Iranians, which was probably absorbed by their ancestors from the Scythians.

---

Modern Turkmens are partially East Iranian of ancestry, same goes for Uzbeks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pahli

There is no genetical flow from Afansiveo to Turks, thats something you claim but cannot backup, no samples or whatsoever.

I am actually 190cm, but no, I don't happen to have light eyes or hair nor do I care, but the same could be applied to you my confused Turkish friend, you are neither fully Mongoloid, nor have any of the features you just listed.

Most of the Turkic genepool in Central Asia is assimilated, you can't deny that. Even Turks of Turkey and especially Azeris are assimilated with almost no genetical contribution from actual Turkic people, instead its a linguistic shift.

The same applies for some Tatars and Chuvash people, assimilated people.

---

You are Iranian just as Jamaican Usain Bolt is Anglo-Saxon. xD

Worry not, Sardinians are in even worse situation than you. They score almost no PIE Yamna. They are fully native farmers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Böri

You are Iranian just as Jamaican Usain Bolt is Anglo-Saxon. xD

Worry not, Sardinians are in even worse situation than you. They score almost no PIE Yamna. They are fully native farmers.

---

Guess what, I don't care :)

The problem is when an assimilated Kavazian starts claiming left and right when he doesn't have anything to do with mentioned cultures / populations :cool:

Where is butlerking ? In tears now?