American use of depleted uranium and effects on the Iraqi civil population

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hexachordia

The use of depleted nuclear weapons is a sign of malice, not just something for expediency of strategy. And radical wahhabists are western allies do not underestimate this fact, radical wahhabists and the west act togather in the whole mess from Iraq to Afganistan.

Da brazaz of occultism. The west is on a permanent conquest of the world, every inch of land will be conquered and reconquered again in one way other another, this just never stops. Men, probably by only becoming a cesspool worker in India as untocuhables can ensure "peace and love" in this world. In this world, gotta ready for the worst as always.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of armor (tank etc) protection, although it is also found in some antiarmor munitions. The point isn't to use a "nuclear" weapon; it's danger comes if a tank is damaged to the extent that the depleted uranium may leach from the damaged armor tiles. That fact is, the soldiers fighting in the tanks and working with the munitions are the ones most likely to suffer the potential health effects than anyone in the civil population, unless they scavenge a burning armored vehicle.

https://youtu.be/63ReS1D8RPI

Doesn't the US military consume the most amount of oil and produce the most amount of C02? Where's Greta's pleas to reduce their carbon footprint?

IIRC, the Guardian wrote, a decade ago, that the US military is accountable for upto 60% of the US' oil use. Part of an article explaining why the notion that the US goes to war for oil, is only superficially plausible.

The US military also secretly tested radiation poisoning on the US population, iirc. Just as the DoD did in the UK, using the NHS iirc.