Standard Western eurosian cal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gixajo

I don´t know what Gallop meant when he said that of "NA are Neolithic" but NA Neolithic arrived mainly(but probably not only) to NA after crossing all Europe and from Neolithic people from the Iberian peninsula.



From: Ancient genomes from North Africa evidence prehistoric migrations to the Maghreb from both the Levant and Europe


Maybe he wanted to convey that but didn't know how to do it in the right way.

---

I wasn't thinking about Gallop, i didn't see him saying that but this is a common reoccurence on forums. I struggle to get the meaning of his posts so far (lol). Indeed neolithic people went all the way across all Europe and then to North Africa, for a good part. They are not that Barcin-like in the end, mostly blue/purple level of rather central-north Europe. It would be like saying people from lower Saxony are a good representation of Neolithic. Most NAs obviously have something else more basal inspired (ANA and recent Levant like)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Upsilander

I They are not that Barcin-like in the end, mostly blue/purple level of rather central-north Europe. It would be like saying people from lower Saxony are a good representation of Neolithic. Most NAs obviously have something else more basal inspired (ANA and recent Levant like)

---

Modern North Africans, more specifically Moroccans, and more especially from the north, share a good portion of their ancient ancestry with Europeans, not only EEF+WHG, but also Yamnaya. That doesn't make them less African, of course, but it does make them an intermediate step between a "pure African" type SSA and Europe.

Half of EEF (that is not just Anatolian Neolithic but also WHG) is a lot sharing.

The movements through the Strait of Gibraltar are very old, and in both senses, anyone who tries to attribute to the "Moorish presence" in the peninsula ALL the NA contribution that the majority of the Iberian population now has to that period, is wrong. In the same way, the Iberian contribution presented by the modern populations of Morocco, especially from the north.

Target: #Oda#_scaled
Distance: 2.6438% / 0.02643807
70.2 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
19.8 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
7.8 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
2.2 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer

Distance to: #Oda#_scaled
0.05164559 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
0.21481700 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
0.21911587 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.28055787 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer
0.29972533 Levant_Epipaleolithic
0.32754377 Zagros_Neolithic_Farmers
0.33062480 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.41879879 North_Africa_Epipaleolithic
0.54763627 Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer
0.66381346 Amerindian
0.77455879 Yoruba

Anyway, just to illustrate what I´ve said:

https://i.imgur.com/tMihaIO.png

Target: Endovelicus_scaled
Distance: 3.0688% / 0.03068765
44.0 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
39.4 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
5.4 Levant_Epipaleolithic
5.2 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer
3.0 North_Africa_Epipaleolithic
3.0 Yoruba

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gixajo

Modern North Africans, more specifically Moroccans, and more especially from the north, share a good portion of their ancient ancestry with Europeans, not only EEF+WHG, but also Yamnaya. That doesn't make them less African, of course, but it does make them an intermediate step between a "pure African" type SSA and Europe.

Half of EEF (that is not just Anatolian Neolithic but also WHG) is a lot sharing.

The movements through the Strait of Gibraltar are very old, and in both senses, anyone who tries to attribute to the "Moorish presence" in the peninsula ALL the NA contribution that the majority of the Iberian population now has to that period, is wrong. In the same way, the Iberian contribution presented by the modern populations of Morocco, especially from the north.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gixajo

Anyway, just to illustrate what I´ve said:

https://i.imgur.com/tMihaIO.png

---

Generally agrees with what you wrote but case in point, one of their two main components "North Africa Epipaleolithic" is quite far from us. It would be the farthest away Europeans can score (besides full SSA, Amerindian, Siberian) because it's indeed an intermediate between Eurasians and SSA.

Distance to: Upsilander23andme
0.06886528 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
0.20199916 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
0.22745735 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.28573507 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer
0.29725344 Levant_Epipaleolithic
0.33344064 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.33598868 Zagros_Neolithic_Farmers
0.42223266 North_Africa_Epipaleolithic
0.55631025 Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer
0.67613716 Amerindian
0.78739796 Yoruba

Is it the same model you ran? (i don't see an EHG)

Also little experiment to see what's into this Early Bronze Age we all score highly (decent distance for ancients)

Target: Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
Distance: 7.0537% / 0.07053697
47.0 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
24.4 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
24.2 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer
3.2 Zagros_Neolithic_Farmers
1.2 Amerindian

Fits as the commonly accepted model EHG + CHG of the Steppe (here it likes to pick up some ANF too)


Bonus

Target: Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
Distance: 9.2201% / 0.09220147
75.0 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer
17.8 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer
6.2 Amerindian
1.0 Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer

Distance to: Repent:RealG25_scaled
0.07511502 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
0.22057718 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
0.22937703 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.27386541 Caucasus_Hunter_Gatherer
0.29584907 Levant_Epipaleolithic
0.31854923 Zagros_Neolithic_Farmers
0.34569819 Western_European_Hunter_Gatherer
0.41827410 North_Africa_Epipaleolithic
0.52199143 Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer
0.65243702 Amerindian
0.77580747 Yoruba


Target: Repent:RealG25_scaled
Distance: 5.8810% / 0.05880950
66.0 Early_Bronze_Age_Europe_Indoeuropean
21.0 Anatolia_Neolithic_Farmers
9.8 Eastern_European_Hunter_Gatherer
3.2 Siberian_Hunter_Gatherer