Slavic Expansion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Feiichy

Major conclusions from the paper:

Slavic migrations completely transformed genetic landscape of eastern, central and southeastern Europe

- Slavs replaced local population in Germany and Croatia up to 80%, less in northern Russia
- much of central and eastern Germany had Sorb like genetic profile and area was later re-Germanized in Ostsidelung
- modern Croats are less than 80% Slavic today, so post-medieval there was resurgence of local Balkan ancestry
- Poland is def. not the origin of proto Slavs and Germanic tribes lived in Poland before Slavs emigrated from the east and almost completely replaced old population
- proto Slavs already acquired EEF enriched ancestry in forest zone of northeastern Europe
- Slavic migrations included mass population movements with women and children, unlike Germanic warrior male dominated migrations
- Croatian medieval Slavs share more IBD with German medieval Slavs than both share with Polish Slav samples which is somewhat surprising
- R1a M458 is not a good marker of proto Slavs and seems it was Slavicized in central Europe already after formation of early Slavs. Two main early Slavic lineages are instead R1a Z280 and I2a Y3210.

---

Complete nonsense and ignorance.
You are just spitting up stuff overfed to you through "academic" propaganda.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #Oda#

Ah so ... Hm, I don't know. For me it's always been geographic Eastern Germany, except a strip in the very west.

EDIT: Coming to my mind, he takes other borders as a basis ofc, being an Edelnazi, so the centre would be more east and then I can agree to your statement.

---

Such nonsense. More accurate would be to say that "Eastern Germany" is the old home of Połabscy ("Beyond the Elbe"). One of the main Venedovian cult centres was on current German territory.
The original inhabitants of Germany were an Alpinid race and were conquered by the British (Phoenicians) in 950 BC. That is the main source of Nordic influence in Germany.

There is an upcoming study about Polish Y-DNA haplogroups by my friend who is a geneticist.

It will be published in "Human Genetics" journal. According to this upcoming study 60% of Polish males belong to as few as 23 lineages (including 16 lineages within haplogroup R1a) all of which are younger than 2750 years (so they emerged in the Iron Age because the end of the Bronze Age in East-Central Europe is dated to the middle of the 8th century BCE). I already have the manuscript of this study and I would share excerpts and graphs with you, but I promised not to publicize it before official publication. This study will support the idea of an Iron Age origin of Slavs from a relatively small founder population.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wandal

Such nonsense. More accurate would be to say that "Eastern Germany" is the old home of Połabscy ("Beyond the Elbe"). One of the main Venedovian cult centres was on current German territory.
The original inhabitants of Germany were an Alpinid race and were conquered by the British (Phoenicians) in 950 BC. That is the main source of Nordic influence in Germany.

---

The Polish cousin of the Serbian user "Novi Pazar"...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peterski

There is an upcoming study about Polish Y-DNA haplogroups by my friend who is a geneticist.

It will be published in "Human Genetics" journal. According to this upcoming study 60% of Polish males belong to as few as 23 lineages (including 16 lineages within haplogroup R1a) all of which are younger than 2750 years (so they emerged in the Iron Age because the end of the Bronze Age in East-Central Europe is dated to the middle of the 8th century BCE). I already have the manuscript of this study and I would share excerpts and graphs with you, but I promised not to publicize it before official publication. This study will support the idea of an Iron Age origin of Slavs from a relatively small founder population.

---

Regardless of any such "studies" which are usually just a farce of propaganda which will use "carefully selected samples", the idea that Venedovian ancestors originated 725 BC is preposterous and ridiculous. They just suddenly appeared a complete nation by the Azov Sea region out of nowhere? Common sense alone says this is impossible.

Just research information on the ancient city of Arkaim in Russia and the connection to geography in the Sanskrit Vedas.