You can select a population average to be removed from your input so it will highlight the influence you have from other side.
Printable View
Neither do I.
I am heavly Slavic + Balkan mixed
..got only one 79 in Romania (80 is Red), 78 Serbia.
but there are worse examples.
Here:
https://i.imgur.com/JQN4Mr0.png
Just out of curiosity as I've done more than one test ^
https://i.imgur.com/FumJ0yp.png < Test 2 &
the average > https://i.imgur.com/fpl858i.png
Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian 4.59
Basque 0.07
Central_African -
Central_Euro 3.50
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 10.34
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 4.50
East_Med 13.35
Eastern_Euro 0.67
Fennoscandian -
French 2.59
Iberian 11.25
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 24.98
Malayan -
Near_Eastern 8.53
North_African -
North_Atlantic -
North_Caucasian 1.53
North_Sea 7.04
Northeast_African -
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural -
West_African -
West_Caucasian 3.10
West_Med 3.98
Any thoughts on this map? I'm very curious as to what the red areas suggest about my background
https://preview.ibb.co/f7SOEc/K36_similarity_map.png
Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian -
Basque 5.04
Central_African -
Central_Euro 8.71
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 8.17
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 7.50
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 2.20
Fennoscandian 9.31
French 2.11
Iberian 9.58
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 6.83
Malayan -
Near_Eastern -
North_African -
North_Atlantic 14.68
North_Caucasian 6.30
North_Sea 15.34
Northeast_African -
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural -
West_African -
West_Caucasian 2.45
West_Med 1.79
Some German averages I found.
http://sv.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2...9#.Wqqmi-ch2Uk
Thanks, this is very useful. Looks like most of my numbers align with West Germany based on your averages. This also seems to match the K36 LAT LONG results:
https://thumb.ibb.co/bZKiHx/k36_lat_long.jpg
I'm still wondering why most of the similarities on the original map show such I large degree of concentration in Denmark and the Orkney Islands. Many people who I know that are from Germany show a much broader concentration focused more on central Germany.
Any thoughts on why none of them are in the 80s?
https://i.imgur.com/KKWjgGA.png
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian 0.51
Basque 2.51
Central_African -
Central_Euro 7.28
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 3.35
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 8.72
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 8.69
Fennoscandian 8.96
French 14.64
Iberian 4.92
Indo-Chinese -
Italian 14.06
Malayan -
Near_Eastern 2.24
North_African 0.25
North_Atlantic 2.86
North_Caucasian 5.64
North_Sea 8.64
Northeast_African -
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian 2.35
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.78
West_African -
West_Caucasian 0.81
West_Med 2.81
Its interesting how people of Madrid and west of Madrid have similarities over 80% with Catalonians, Southern France, Central France, Paris, Northwest Italy and far Lombardy. But in the middle we have Aragon with around 70%! Is it the basque influence over Aragon?
^Yeah that's weird. It seems purely geography alone is not the only factor in these things. Cause degree of similarity seems to jump around from place to place.
my k15 is thus:
# Population Percent
1 EAST_MED 23.14
2 WEST_MED 14.13
3 NORTH-CENTRAL_EURO 13.93
4 SOUTH_BALTIC 13.8
5 ATLANTIC 13.51
6 EAST_EURO 12.38
7 WEST_ASIAN 6.3
8 MIDDLE_EASTERN 2.58
9 EAST_ASIAN 0.32
Minehttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...f8ed045e11.jpg
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
My fathershttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...b7ff8fdcf4.jpg
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
....
Great thanks for the map!