Printable View
I never said that it 'cancels' the blood or that you are not American English if you don't follow the Anglo culture. I just find sad that people leave the culture of his ancestors behind to adopt another completely different way of life. Fortunately, here in Brazil, mostly descendants of recent German or other European migrants managed to preserve their original culture while still being part of the general Brazilian society.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
Everybody knows nothern slavs were germanized during Wend Cruzades. Many poles can trace their ancestry to lands in current Ukraine, poles inhabited lands more southern than today.
So, what's your problem then?Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
I don't have a problem. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
Not really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacrificed Ram
First of all, they are just about 15% of modern Poland's inhabitants, and secondly they are not only from Ukraine, but Belarus, Lithuania and Latvia as well - so also from more northern lands:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4650548
Here is an ethnic Pole with ancestry from North-East Kresy (now he lives in Poland):
GEDmatch kit number: M084406
His results in Eurogenes K36 are the following:
Central_Euro 6.22
East_Balkan 7.65
East_Central_Euro 30.42
Eastern_Euro 18.13
Fennoscandian 16.44
French 1.88
Iberian 6.89
Italian 2.46
North_Atlantic 2.25
North_Sea 7.61
And his K36 similarity rates to modern populations:
http://gen3553.pagesperso-orange.fr/ADN/similitude.htm
As you can see, he is not very similar to Ukrainians:
https://i.imgur.com/wY6gSe5.png
^^^
He is one of Poles resettled after WW2 from these areas:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4655955
Attachment 68237
I disagree, this is the interesting border.
Where's this?Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerchip
I'm calculating a weighted average for you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
But what do you mean by Deafgermania?
It's the border between Belgium and the Netherlands at a cafe. Pretty cool if you ask me. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerchip
this border is better
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/5e/53/de/5...ry-prussia.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Peterman, I didn't say poles are ukrainians, but that their ethnogenesis was in now current ukrainian territory.
^^^
Political borders are not the same as ethnic borders. Some of my ancestors in 1377-1434 lived in the area controlled by the Teutonic Order (Pomerelia), but they were ethnically Polish.
The loss of the Eastern German and Polish lands by their respective nations in the aftermath of WWII was a huge tragedy.
can be also of more noble origin: http://www.jhi.pl/blog/2012-11-01-historia-nazwisk http://www.fronda.pl/a/nazwiska-zydo...sce,54044.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
Poland had more Jewish people than Germanic one
Some pomersh retained slavs and was absorbed into poles. The problem is when protestant reform, the protestant slavs will align with germans, while catholics with poles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
How do you think baltics became protestants and poles not?
Yeah that's true, but Slavs who remained under Polish rule did not convert to Protestantism. Remember that Poland defeated the Teutonic Order and regained Pomerelia in 1466, which is why this region never became dominated by Protestants:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacrificed Ram
http://files.foreignaffairs.com/lega...es/10403-1.jpg
http://files.foreignaffairs.com/lega...es/10403-1.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/1Oj4u3x.png
https://s10.postimg.org/3n5o64ubt/Cat_Prot1.png
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/...Verteilung.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-8LkZNUQHSD...0/Religion.jpg
https://s32.postimg.org/mozorbyud/PL...est_border.png
By the way, this (Trzemeszno Lubuskie) was the westernmost town of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth:
http://i.imgur.com/WjCxmUV.png
http://i.imgur.com/WjCxmUV.png
http://i.imgur.com/3UE5KZk.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/3UE5KZk.jpg
The origin of Polish-German genetic differences is not anything recent, certainly not population movements after WW2.
It is much deeper, because Lusatian Sorbs - a Slavic minority in Germany - are genetically like Poles, not like Germans.
Here is a map showing genetic similarities of Sorbs to other populations:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...kopolska-Poles
They have 94% similarity to Wielkopolska Poles versus only 90% to East Germans, and much less to other Germans:
http://i.imgur.com/YLRzalt.png
I suppose that these people are genetically like Sorbs and Poles, despite speaking German today:
1) https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4465615
2) https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4459218
As far as I know, there are no genetic studies about them. Unlike in case of Sorbs and Kashubians.
And I did not manage to find anyone with 100% of ancestry from those groups, only 37.5%:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Ok, ok.
But acheology doesn't lie. Northern Poland was Goth (extinct east germanic people) territory, after they abondoned those lands, then was occupied by slavs.
http://www.learn.columbia.edu/course...annsIIpg48.jpg
Goths originated probably in Pomerania but later occupied most of Eastern Poland, both North-Eastern and South-Eastern. Until the 1st century BC or the 1st century CE, parts of Western and South-Western Poland were occupied by the Lugians (probably Celtic-speaking people), later by the Vandals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacrificed Ram
I don't think that all of them abandoned those lands. Evidence (both archaeological and genetic, as well as written sources) suggests that Slavs came and mixed with those previous inhabitants.
But there is no consensus as to where was the Urheimat of the Proto-Slavs located.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacrificed Ram
====================
Currently there are several research projects on the Migration Period in Poland:
https://www.ncn.gov.pl/finansowanie-...cz?language=en
http://www.mpov.uw.edu.pl/en/
Linguistical and Anthropological evidences suggests that West Slavic speakers heavily outnumbered any Gothic or generic East Germanic tribe that lived in the region after the mass migrations. I can't talk about archeology or genetic because i'm not very informed about archeological studies done in Poland, can you show me these evidences?Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
https://s26.postimg.org/lpl9p6zqh/Fi...d-in-1921-.png
This was an older idea before WW2.
Poland would be larger (include parts of Ukraine, Lithuania, Belaras who back then had Polish groups living there).
Germany would be larger. (include parts of Western Poland today)
Russia would be larger (include parts of Ukraine, might be wrong)
Mixed feelings on the idea, but maybe things would be different or improved.
https://s26.postimg.org/dmn3dvf55/Sl...th_century.jpg
Obviously tribes shifted or absorbed.
https://s26.postimg.org/s7468pa3t/2_Za9_Lr4.jpg
Nations 1000 ad
+/- this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...beskidzkie.png
Why do they want to be german so bad?
Here are a few models for my own genetic ancestry, with use of ancient samples from different periods. The last period includes Early Medieval Slavic samples (green color). This graph also indicates, that Slavic people originated from a mix of BR2/IR1-like and RISE598-like populations (these are - respectively - samples from Late Bronze Age / Iron Age Hungary and Sudovia; RISE598 is from Sudovia):Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
https://i.imgur.com/iR6BhTN.png
https://i.imgur.com/iR6BhTN.png
RISE431 and I0115 are Unetice samples. Zve28 is Corded Ware, RISE567 is Bell Beaker.
BR2 and RISE371 are Late Bronze Age Hungary. IR1 is Iron Age Hungary.
RISE598 (from Sudovia) and BR2 (from Hungary) are both about 3000 years old.
Red samples are Sintashta (RISE395), Mezhovskaya (RISE523) and Sarmatian (I0574).
================================
But MA7, NE34 and Wielbark are low quality samples because these are just screening results:
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJNA354503
The same samples will be published later (probably in 2018) in high coverage (high quality).
Samples from the following archaeological sites will be published:
Niemcza (NE) = 900-1000 AD,
Markowice (MA) = 1000-1200 AD,
Sowinki = 1000-1100 AD,
Łęgowo = 1000-1200 AD,
Gniezno = 1000-1200 AD,
Kowalewko (Wielbark) = 100-300 AD,
Masłomęcz (Wielbark) = 200-400 AD.
Wends (Pomeranians) probable were also mixed with vikings. The viking-slav mixes gave origin for ruthenians more for south.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
As for archaeology:Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
Summary of new research on the Migration Period in East Germany and westernmost Poland (Armin Volkmann "Siedlung – Klima – Migrationen: Geoarchäologische Forschungen zur Oderregion zwischen 700 vor und 1000 nach Chr. mit Fokus auf der Völkerwanderungszeit"):
https://www.academia.edu/1495365/Sie...wanderungszeit
"In the context of the study, an analysis in a GIS of sites from the Iron Age to the Early Middle Ages was applied to the River Oder Region. A site catchment analysis of the topographical setting, the soil and broader parameters was conducted as a GIS examination. In this the spatial data information in a probable operating radius around the respective settlements of the individual periods was collected and evaluated statistically. In this way, statistically significant climate proxies on the relative humidity index and temperature pattern of the paleoclimate could be demonstrated. Through the use of weighted average means it was possible to describe climate signals of the compared periods. The quantitative analysis of the data of more than 500 finding sites allows identifying significant signals. As a result I found out that at the end of the Iron Age and at the beginning of the migration period, dramatic climate fluctuations are recognized. The climate fluctuations are the main reason for emigration out of this region. In the migration period, and again at the end of the Iron Age, the region was virtually uninhabited for 250 years. The data from the site catchment analysis is in a next step the base for a predictive modeling with has clearly defined areas of high and low probabilities of finding sites.
A site catchment analysis of the topographical setting, the soil and broader parameters was conducted as a GIS examination, in which the spatial data information in a probable operating radius around the respective settlements of the individual periods was collected and evaluated statistically. In this way, statistically significant climate proxies on the relative humidity index and temperature pattern of the paleoclimate could be demonstrated. In addition, the deciding location factors of the soil and the geoecological environment of the settlement as well as distortionary anthropogenic and natural superimpositions were discussed. The ecological indicator values were rearranged into concise categories in a transformation process in consideration of their usability and informative value for matters concerning prehistoric, agronomically orientated cultures and checked for climate signals. The identified climate signals do not represent absolute data, but rather indirect, relative data, which permit comparative statements concerning the previous and subsequent level.
With the use of comparative climate research, palynology, dendrochronology, the status of glaciers, river levels and models of paleotemperature, the climate signals that were produced in the context of the GIS environmental analysis could be verified. In this way, the probability and concision of the environmental analysis developed here and its particularly detailed chronological value were substantiated.
The final step of the GIS analysis is based on Voronoi diagrams of the sites mapped as prehistoric space models. They show concepts of space in time. In a cartographic reconstruction of settlement clusters, the relationship between the anthropogenically influenced agricultural area and extensive natural forest areas was visualised. These methods are a part for the predictive modeling to clarify for example the most interesting regions of the settlements in the migration period.
In the early Migration Period (D), the climate worsened dramatically and weather became very cool and dry in the course of only a few decades. Very poor conditions for land cultivation and animal husbandry resulted from this, which withdrew their livelihood in many places from the Germanic groups engaged in subsistence agriculture. On this limited scale, this could be buffered by more intensive trade, like the piled material found on the site and documented by geomorphology on the aforementioned trade and transit routes Settlements in micro regional favoured areas with a guaranteed supply of water such as kettle lakes, for example, could continue to exist. Spatial analysis of settlements shows a strong shrinking of the settlement clusters to remaining areas in which agricultural activity was still possible. Thus, there is a great disparity of a juxtaposition of extremely unequal small scale economic potential, which led to the widespread disintegration of settlement clusters and the accompanying dismantling of settlements in the subsequent late Migration Period (E). Simultaneously, the areas of the extensive natural, potential forest communities that are not influenced by humans increased greatly, whereas in Period E only “islands of remnant settlements” still existed in the surrounding woodlands. These types of settlements are the same as those identified in the late Roman Iron Age, but they have degenerated to a very large extent. Likewise, the parallels in construction are striking, where long houses that were used by a larger settlement community, are very rare. In contrast, smaller residential buildings or barns and storage sheds are frequently in post construction as well as upright and probably log construction, which were used by smaller family alliances, often as individual hamlets.
In this way, the Germanic migration from the Oder region is to be viewed as being organised into at least three main phases:
1. Already in the late Roman Iron Age there was a substantial migration in spite of the moist, warm climate of the favourable phase, which was triggered by the political weakness of the Roman Empire (the so-called imperial crisis of the soldier emperor with the fall of the Upper Germanic and Rhaetian Limes in 254 AD and the subsequent withdrawal of the border in the Rhine and Danube area) in the 3rd century AD and the related opportunities for plundering. This pulling effect of the Roman Empire which was rocked by crisis continued as a domino effect into the eastern Barbaricum in the Oder area. The Germanic migration is not just to be viewed as pointing to the southwest, however, as some Germanic people turned back again in a single cycle, as individual groups with particularly valuable pieces of furniture in late Germanic burial grounds clarify (the so-called “princely grave group of the Haßleben-Leuna- Häven type”).
2. In the early Migration Period, there is a dramatic worsening of the climate, which withdrew the foundation of the subsistence economy from large sections of the population which were characterized by agriculture. However, the political circumstances of the declining Roman Empire with the possibilities of seizing land and the existence of continuing opportunities to plunder increased the very intense migration of the late Germanic population from the Oder, mainly from Period D2, as numerous find sites from Period D1 are known. The high density of settlements in the moist Spree-Havel region, which was used as an intermediate stage in the south-westerly direction of the wave of migration is noticeable. The magnetic effect of the Roman Empire with its impressive, high-quality cultural assets in combination with the worsening climate in Barbaricum triggered an economically orientated wave of migration, which reached its peak in the 5th century AD (due to the simultaneous, political and military weakness of the-Roman Empire). Thus, undoubtedly, there was a heightened potential for conflict at the peak of the drought period, as is revealed by the incursions of Germanic peoples into the Roman Empire.
3. Despite the sharp rise in rainfall numbers in the late Migration Period (Period E), there was no certainty that grain could be harvested in the Oder region, as, on the one hand, the further reaching climate instability did not facilitate this due to torrential rain followed by temporary periods of drought and as, on the other hand, it must be assumed that there was an immense loss of expertise due to the preceding migration, particularly of the elite, younger and flexible sectors of the population. These problems were intensified even more by the heavy encroachment of scrub and the reforestation or partial desertification of the agricultural areas that were previously forsaken during Period D, as there was no potential labour force available for the agronomic re-cultivation of these fallow lands for labour intensive forest clearance measures (e.g. due to a positive population balance or birth surplus). Now, due to the relative increase in humidity as well, the Spree-Havel area, which had proven to be a favoured settlement area during the dry phase of Period D2, was of no agronomic interest. Up until Period E2 there was an almost complete dismantling of settlements in that area. Only in the northern part of the area being studied, an isolated remnant of the Germanic population whose economic basis is to be viewed as being linked to trade with Scandinavia to compensate for its non-productive agriculture is still also sporadically tangible in the 7th century AD (Period E3). In addition to that, however, all “remnants of Germanic traces” are located in only one diagonal strip of the very fertile marly soil which runs from north to south and is composed of a greatly varied biogeographical potential, which enabled flexible agriculture to be the primary source of income. The site where heaped material was found on both sides of the Oder in regions where there is black earth, with the most fertile soils and above all, an optimal groundwater level is of note. In addition, outside of the area under examination, as in the Magdeburger Börde, in the Thuringian Basin (Thüringer Becken) or in the Wetterau, an elevated incidence of finds from Period E is to be noted in these basin landscapes that are moulded by a relatively dry continental climate. There is a clear connection between the spatial distribution of the black earth and the late Migration Period sites.
The time of the earliest Slavic immigration is to be dated in river Oder region not before 700 AD."
======================
On the other hand, here quite different conclusions (but it about other areas, northern and Central Poland):
http://www.eaa2017maastricht.nl/download2456
"MIGRATION PERIOD BETWEEN ODRA AND VISTULA: NEW SOURCES, NEW IDEAS
Author: Prof Bursche, Aleksander - University of Warsaw
Co-Author: Dr Zapolska, Anna - University of Warsaw (Presenting author)
Keywords: coins, Barbarians, imitations
Presentation
Brief results of 5-year Project „Migration Period between Odra and Vistula” realised by the international team will be presented in the context of new archeological and natural sciences data including pollen, radiocarbon, DNA or isotopic analysis. Transfer of technology from late Roman Empire to Barbaricum and political conflicts were the main reasons and mechanisms of the migration both to the South - Western Roman Empire and backwards to the North - Scandinavia. New sources from central and northern Poland testify continuation of settlement activity of elite character in so-called central places, emporia, logistic and power centers, having evident traces of Germanic character, until 7th c. AD. Undoubtedly we have to deal with German-Slavonic coexistence, what explains, between other, continuation of hydronims (water names), cf. Vistula. In the light of the most recent results we have to deal with relatively short hiatus from mid 7th until end of 8th century AD, when the first Scandinavian material appeared again at the southern Baltic coast. Perhaps we have to deal with survival in elite’s memory in the North (runs, sagas) relationship between inhabitants of Scandinavia and of the lower Danube/Ukraine region through lower Vistula territory?"
And here another Migration Period settlement, discovered just several days ago:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...n-Wielkopolska
More from the same region:
http://naukawpolsce.pap.pl/aktualnos...ej-europy.html
Translated to English:
"(...) Polish archaeologists long thought, that between the Migration Period and the Middle Ages a total collapse of settlement took place - areas of modern Poland were supposed to be abandoned by previous population, and it was thought that only after some time Slavs came from the east and re-settled the area.
But large-scale archeological studies conducted during the last few decades modify this picture, especially in case of Greater Poland [Wielkopolska region].
Archaeologists point out especially to discoveries from Konarzewo. There they have managed to find the larges up-to-now in Poland number of surviving dwellings, which falsifies the claim, that these areas were abandoned during the Migration Period. (...) Constructions are from the 5th and the 6th centuries. They are connected with people representing Przeworsk culture.
"Przeworks culture during its existence was an entity with an undoubtedly germanic cultural model, but it doesn't mean, that it was formed exclusively by Germanic population" - says prof. Michałowski
Prof. Michałowski cannot provide an explicit answer to the question who inhabited multiple settlements flourishing in Greater Poland in the 4th, 5th and 6th centuries. Material culture - excavated items - indicate germanic influences, "but we don't know what was really their ethnic identity - most likely they just considered themselves to be locals, born in that place, and desiring to live there until their death" - concludes prof. Michałowski.
It is thought that Slavs appeared in areas of present-day Poland in the 2nd half of the 6th century or in the 7th century.
Conclusions of prof. Michałowski are supported by findings of a team of scientists who are members of the research Project "Migration Period between Odra and Vistula" (LINK to project's website), directed by prof. Alexander Bursche.
These scientists have already established by now, that in the mid-1st millennium a total disappearance of human settlement did NOT take place in the territory of present-day Poland. According to this research team, the population adhering to germanic cultural traditions, which was present in the territory of present-day Poland during the Migration Period, stayed and became assimilated with the Slavs. (...)"
Thanks for the kindness. So, going by the graphics that you posted, is it secure to assume that modern Polish population have around 10-15% Wielbark-like ancestry?Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Procopius, History of the Wars, III, xxii, 13-16:
"(...) Now as for those Vandals who remained in their native land [Poland?], neither remembrance nor any name of them has been preserved to my time. (...) they were either overpowered by the neighbouring barbarians or they were mingled with them not at all unwillingly and their name gave way to that of their conquerors. Indeed, when the Vandals were conquered at that time by Belisarius, no thought occurred to them to go from there to their ancestral homes. For they were not able to convey themselves suddenly from Libya to Europe, especially as they had no ships at hand, but paid the penalty [2] there for all the wrongs they had done the Romans and especially the Zacynthians. (...)"
[2] In Arcana, 18, 5 ff., Procopius estimates the number of the Vandals in Africa, at the time of Belisarius, at 80,000 males, and intimates that practically all perished.
I guess so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
It would be interesting to do the same thing in old Gothic settlements like Northern Italy, Spain and Septimania.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
Eee... much more interesting would be, how many Wielbarkers live today...Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
In what sense? I don't think it's possible to find a predominantly Wielbark-erish individual autossomally-wise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
In normal - in what else?Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
They didn;t die out - it would be very hard for
them to do it, if they participated 15% in genotype.
:picard2:Quote:
I don't think it's possible to find a predominantly Wielbark-erish individual autossomally-wise.
They didn't died, they were completely assimilated by other populations like the West Slavs in Poland. :picard1:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
So logically, they are still here, aren't they?Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
The only problem is, to identify them and count.
The genetic legacy is still there, obviously, but i doubt that there's someone or a isolated group thay is predominantly Wielberkarish. Like i said, they were assimilated and even completely subjugated by other population, this is why the East Germanic languages died.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
:picard2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Token
So you yourself claim they did not die out.Quote:
Like i said, they were assimilated and even completely subjugated by other population, this is why the East Germanic languages died.
If I will subjugate you, and cut off your tounge - will you stop to be yourself? :picard2: