xDxD:devil666:
Printable View
Those who dislike their results, don't need to worry cause they can still plan their "paleoxxxxx" identity.
In 3000 years if someone uncover their DNA, they will be called "paleoxxxx" people
You just have to die on a specific location you like the most.
Anyone wanna be the first to upgrade to premium map? :lol:
Dude, you are speaking about DAI and this is not primarly source besised it mentiones many unpleasant things about Serbs - slave origin of their ethnonym, lands emptied by Bulgarians etc.
Paganija was inhabited by Neretljani, separate South Slavic tribe.
I am quite tried of you claims of Croatian Lands. You have Serbia , stick to that. Interesting how I don't see such agressive Bulgarian claims on Serbian lands and they have lot of material for that.
They are just more civilised I guess.
Most of Serbs in present day Serbia originated from Dinaric region few centuries in the past. 300 years ago central and western Serbia were almost empty.
Only Shopi (Torlaks) from southeastern Serbia and few enclaves in other parts of Serbia are there since middle age.
Nothing remarkable here:
https://i.imgur.com/DsbZGZN.png
Maybe it's worth contacting this website, to see if they have GEDmatch kit #'s to all of these Ancient population groups they're using as reference. It would be awesome if we could compare them 1v1
Yes, Croatia doesn't exist, Serbia until Tokyo. Don't complain about genocide than, few nations suffered such agression towards their lands, history and identity as we did under your short rule.
And looks like nothing changed, you're still fanatical as always even after recent slap across the face.
Dude, it is time to learn the lesson. Serb expansionism will lead to more victims of your people. You had enough, calm down.
Yes, same happened imn Slavonia, Dalmatia and Lika. Northwestern Croatia have full population which is there since middle age, as Torlaks in Serbia.
Zagorians and Međimurci are different from other Croatians in same level as Torlaks than other Serbs maybe even more.
There is no such thing as Proto-Serbs, Serbs were created around 1000 A.D. when Scythian Slavic ruler Stefan Vojislav removed Roman governor of Singidunum (Belgrade) Theophilos Erotikos.
First Serbian King who assimilated Romans (Vlachs) is called King Mihajlo Vojisavljević who became King 1050 A.D.
All others before him were Princes who ruled as Archons along with Romans as direct Vassals to Roman Governors.
From 1050 - 1900+ there was a process called: Slavicization of the Romans on Balkans.
There was no particular issues since Both Serbs and Vlachs were loyal to Roman Empire after Schism and Roman Religion later known as Orthodox Christianity.
That's why we see Serbs as Vlachs.
Do you know that even Romans called themselves Vlachs on Balkans?
Blachernae (Greek: Βλαχέρναι) was a suburb in the northwestern section of Constantinople, the capital city of the Byzantine Empire. It is the site of a water source and a number of prominent churches were built there, most notably the great Church of St. Mary of Blachernae (Panagia Blacherniotissa).
The Romanian philologist Ilie Gherghel, wrote a study about Blachernae and concluded that it possibly derived from the name of a Vlach (sometimes written as Blach or Blasi), who came to Constantinople from the lower Danube, a region named today Dobruja.[2] Gherghel compared data from old historians like Genesios and from the Greek lexicon Suidas and mentioned the existence of a small colony of Vlachs in the area of today Blachernae. Similar opinions were sustained by Lisseanu[3]. The name Blachernae appeared in a work of Theophanes Confessor in connection with a revolt of Flavius Vitalianus against Anastasius Emperor in 513
So NO.
Serbs are More Vlachs than they are Western Slavic Serbian People how they identify.
Sorbs obviously have nothing to do with Serbs. Their clade of R1a doesn't even match Serbs and I2a is non existant in them. Sorbs have as much to do with Serbs as Caucasus Albania has to do with Albanians.
There's no consensus on the Serb Ethnonym but the Serboi Sarmatian theory is more likely.
Wrong. R1a M458 exist in Serbs, Tesla had it. It is true however you have not much genetic continuity with them.
It isn't disputed White Serbs came from East Germany where Dervan's Serbia was located, whoever denies that has agenda. And that Sorbs (Lužički Srbi) are their descendants.
So look at proto-Serb genetics among them.