Dodecad Ancestry Project

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Imperivm

(3.4, 63.1, 26.5, 0, 6.9, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.1, 0) :embarrassed

---

[1,] "Kent_1KG" "3.3226"
[2,] "Dutch_D" "3.9674"
[3,] "British_D" "4.6808"
[4,] "Cornwall_1KG" "5.02"
[5,] "British_Isles_D" "5.0229"
[6,] "Mixed_Germanic_D" "6.5894"
[7,] "Irish_D" "8.2195"
[8,] "Orkney_1KG" "10.3716"
[9,] "Orcadian" "10.557"
[10,] "Argyll_1KG" "11.584"
[11,] "CEU" "12.131"
[12,] "N._European" "12.4169"
[13,] "French" "13.4034"
[14,] "French_D" "14.462"
[15,] "Norwegian_D" "14.5942"
[16,] "Swedish_D" "16.6445"
[17,] "German_D" "17.6717"
[18,] "French_Basque" "22.8961"
[19,] "Spaniards" "30.0125"
[20,] "Slovenian" "30.3457"



[1,] "11.9% French_Basque + 88.1% Kent_1KG" "1.2398"
[2,] "82.9% British_Isles_D + 17.1% French_Basque" "1.7166"
[3,] "86.5% British_Isles_D + 13.5% Spaniards" "1.8262"
[4,] "91.6% Kent_1KG + 8.4% Spaniards" "1.8832"
[5,] "87.2% British_Isles_D + 12.8% Spanish_D" "1.9203"
[6,] "92.1% Kent_1KG + 7.9% Spanish_D" "1.9281"
[7,] "87.4% British_Isles_D + 12.6% IBS" "1.9441"
[8,] "7.6% IBS + 92.4% Kent_1KG" "1.9916"
[9,] "89.3% British_Isles_D + 10.7% North_Italian" "2.03"
[10,] "74.3% British_Isles_D + 25.7% French" "2.0403"
[11,] "84.4% British_D + 15.6% French_Basque" "2.0569"
[12,] "75.9% Cornwall_1KG + 24.1% French_D" "2.1132"
[13,] "75.9% British_Isles_D + 24.1% French_D" "2.138"
[14,] "87.8% British_D + 12.2% Spaniards" "2.1517"
[15,] "76.1% British_D + 23.9% French" "2.1521"
[16,] "77.5% British_D + 22.5% French_D" "2.1782"
[17,] "94.7% Kent_1KG + 5.3% Sardinian" "2.1938"
[18,] "88.5% British_D + 11.5% Spanish_D" "2.1976"
[19,] "90.3% British_D + 9.7% North_Italian" "2.1981"
[20,] "14.8% French_D + 85.2% Kent_1KG" "2.1989"

^^ Yet another test where I come closer to the Dutch than the British! :icon_ask:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Imperivm

^^ Yet another test where I come closer to the Dutch than the British! :icon_ask:

---

As I told you before, you have to drop the "W", embrace your Saxon blood.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Imperivm

^^ Yet another test where I come closer to the Dutch than the British! :icon_ask:

---

Well, you are closest to the Kentishmen (and so am I by the way!). :) So yes - as Kadu suggested - you are probably more Anglo-Saxon than average (well, the Jutes settled in Kent anyway).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Loki

Well, you are closest to the Kentishmen (and so am I by the way!). :) So yes - as Kadu suggested - you are probably more Anglo-Saxon than average (well, the Jutes settled in Kent anyway).

---

It surprises me because my phenotype is atlantid and my farther looks like a typical 'Old Briton' mediterranid. However, my mother is very North European looking, and her parents are from the North of England. I expect that she would score very close to the Dutch/Kent groups.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Imperivm

It surprises me because my phenotype is atlantid and my farther looks like a typical 'Old Briton' mediterranid. However, my mother is very North European looking, and her parents are from the North of England. I expect that she would score very close to the Dutch/Kent groups.

---

I expect the mutations that cause a phenotypical look beeing quiet few.
But you could also blame your estaminated Iberian admixture ;)

Quote:

---

[1,] "11.9% French_Basque + 88.1% Kent_1KG" "1.2398"
[2,] "82.9% British_Isles_D + 17.1% French_Basque" "1.7166"
[3,] "86.5% British_Isles_D + 13.5% Spaniards" "1.8262"
[4,] "91.6% Kent_1KG + 8.4% Spaniards" "1.8832"
[5,] "87.2% British_Isles_D + 12.8% Spanish_D" "1.9203"
[6,] "92.1% Kent_1KG + 7.9% Spanish_D" "1.9281"

---

Here is Loki (this time inlcuding the "Mixed mode"):

[1,] "CEU" "10.1005"
[2,] "N._European" "10.9398"
[3,] "German_D" "11.3309"
[4,] "Slovenian" "11.9122"
[5,] "Argyll_1KG" "11.9445"
[6,] "Orcadian" "12.3891"
[7,] "Orkney_1KG" "12.7934"
[8,] "French" "13.9101"
[9,] "French_D" "14.0915"
[10,] "Hungarians" "16.5795"
[11,] "Mixed_Germanic_D" "17.4161"
[12,] "Dutch_D" "19.0431"
[13,] "Kent_1KG" "21.4299"
[14,] "Tuscan_H" "22.0259"
[15,] "TSI" "22.1499"
[16,] "Tuscan_X" "22.1504"
[17,] "N_Italian_D" "22.5493"
[18,] "Portuguese_D" "23.4017"
[19,] "British_D" "23.5064"
[20,] "British_Isles_D" "23.5323"

And the mixed Mode:
(note how all of these are even far closer than "average CEU" (wich is the closest single population), wich has a difference of 10.1)

[1,] "49.8% Irish_D + 50.2% Romanians_14" "2.5352"
[2,] "53.1% British_Isles_D + 46.9% Romanians_14" "2.5396"
[3,] "53.1% British_D + 46.9% Romanians_14" "2.5474"
[4,] "58.4% Dutch_D + 41.6% Romanians_14" "2.6267"
[5,] "55.4% Kent_1KG + 44.6% Romanians_14" "2.6919"
[6,] "52.5% Cornwall_1KG + 47.5% Romanians_14" "2.7072"
[7,] "60.6% Mixed_Germanic_D + 39.4% Romanians_14" "2.729"
[8,] "21.3% Greek_D + 78.7% N._European" "2.9889"
[9,] "66.8% German_D + 33.2% Tuscan_X" "2.9932"
[10,] "66.8% German_D + 33.2% TSI" "3.0231"
[11,] "71.8% German_D + 28.2% O_Italian_D" "3.0621"
[12,] "22.8% Greek_D + 77.2% Argyll_1KG" "3.18"
[13,] "24.4% C_Italian_D + 75.6% German_D" "3.2441"
[14,] "79.8% German_D + 20.2% S_Italian_D" "3.2901"
[15,] "66.8% German_D + 33.2% Tuscan_H" "3.3168"
[16,] "48% Balkans_D + 52% Cornwall_1KG" "3.3483"
[17,] "28.3% Romanians_14 + 71.7% N._European" "3.3483"
[18,] "78.4% German_D + 21.6% S_Italian_Sicilian_D" "3.3586"
[19,] "42.1% Balkans_D + 57.9% Dutch_D" "3.5152"
[20,] "79.2% German_D + 20.8% Sicilian_D" "3.5291"

OK, since "CEU" is the closest single population, lets see, whats the difference is, to CEU average:

[21,] "73.6% CEU + 26.4% Romanians_14" "3.555"
[26,] "80.5% CEU + 19.5% Greek_D" "3.6377"
[29,] "84% CEU + 16% Turkish_D" "3.7811"
[38,] "85.6% CEU + 14.4% Cypriots" "3.998"

Second closest single population is "N.European" wich is a group from a scientific study and includes... well "Northern Europeans". But I never actually saw a list, from what countries.

[8,] "21.3% Greek_D + 78.7% N._European" "2.9889"
[17,] "28.3% Romanians_14 + 71.7% N._European" "3.3483"
[47,] "19.8% Sicilian_D + 80.2% N._European" "4.2124"

And now the difference to average German (third closest single population):

[9,] "66.8% German_D + 33.2% Tuscan_X" "2.9932"
[10,] "66.8% German_D + 33.2% TSI" "3.0231"
[11,] "71.8% German_D + 28.2% O_Italian_D" "3.0621"
[13,] "24.4% C_Italian_D + 75.6% German_D" "3.2441"

Hmm ok.
Lets check from the Slovenian (4th) view:
[35,] "45.7% French + 54.3% Slovenian" "3.9404"

Now I check the values.
West-Asian with rounded 11% is somewhat higher than average CEU (7%), GErman (7%), British (7%), Dutch (8%), French (5%) or Norwegian 4% (Lokis known anchestry)

Places, in Europe, where that is higher:
North Italy: 13%, Central Italy: 22%, South Italy: 26%, Sicily 23%
Romania: 16%, Bulgaria: 17%, Greece 26%

I think thats the value that is mainly responsable for Oracle wanting to mix some Italian or Southeastern European into it.

Dodecad 'Africa 9' calculator, designed for more specific African breakdowns.

Here is what I get when I run mine through:

67.17% Europe
6.06% NW_Africa
25.04% SW_Asia
0.00% E_Africa
1.01% S_Africa
0.00% Mbuti
0.00% W_Africa
0.48% Biaka
0.24% San

67.64% Europe
2.87% NW_Africa
26.49% SW_Asia
0.03% E_Africa
1.42% S_Africa
0.01% Mbuti
0.00% W_Africa
0.00% Biaka
1.53% San

It seems pretty much everyone has this San bit:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BtnJCDJuGV...w/s1600/_9.png

Africa 9 calc.


60.14% Europe
12.57% NW_Africa
26.39% SW_Asia
0.89% E_Africa
0.00% S_Africa
0.00% Mbuti
0.00% W_Africa
0.00% Biaka
0.00% San