I will try this laterQuote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
Printable View
I will try this laterQuote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
https://i.postimg.cc/bw3XLhy7/earlyanglosaxons.png
model of early 'unmixed' anglo saxons in england
What were the reference pops you used on this ?Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
right = c("Mbuti.DG", "EarlyCW_LN1_poz81.SG","Netherlands_BellBeaker.AG" , "Croatia_Jagodnjak_MBA.SG", "Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG", "France_MN.AG", "Denmark_LN_BA.SG", "Denmark_SouthScandinavia_EBA.SG", "Czechia_MBA_Tumulus.AG", "Austria_N_LBK.AG", "Netherlands_LNB_BellBeaker.AG")Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier727
Thanks for thatQuote:
Originally Posted by drb234
Models of modern north English groups. Would translate to roughly 55-60% early Anglo-Saxon
https://i.postimg.cc/rsRgbz0T/English-Yorkshire.png
https://i.postimg.cc/1XVMT4ny/englisheastmids.png
What is France_IA_Hallstatt.SG ? Is it the HautsdefranceIA2 samples? Same with the Denmark_Jutland_IA.SG. I'm assuming IllustrativeDNA has those, just labeled differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
illustrative doesnt, they're from a larger dataset that i useQuote:
Originally Posted by Gannicus
That's disappointing. You'd think they would regularly update the dataset on there.Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
I've been experimenting with those rights.Quote:
Originally Posted by drb234
Attachment 147272
Attachment 147273
Standard errors aren't that great, but I wonder if the p value would cause some to ignore it.
And then I tried just using 2 sources:
Attachment 147274
Attachment 147275
Slightly better with just 2 sources. If one shoots for Z scores 3 or close to it.
Still experimenting. This is what I have for now.