Serb probably.
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/at...2&d=1602605302
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/at...3&d=1602605343
Printable View
And I asked not to post unconfirmed results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Varda
Please don't post results of people whose full ancestry isn't known - knowing someone's surname is absolutely inadequate.
Why not? It's clear they are Serbs or South Slavs. You don't need their detailed genealogy to see that. Serbs and Croats don't even mix much, the same goes for Bosniaks. They all generally keep to themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Well at least he gave the kit numbers. So if someone wants to know their specific ancestry, they can find out. If not, they can be ignored.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Not really, before the war in Bosnia mixed familes were very common. Up to 30% in some cities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto
My city is loaded with mutts, it's extremely common here. Much less in rural areas.
If Zagreb is mixed and makes up 25% of Croatia's population, it shouldn't be ignored. This trend is on the rise basically everywhere. Capitals and big cities are attracting more and more people which results in the leveling of regional differences. Only on TA people would overemphasize small and unrepresentative groups.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
How would those mixed Bosnians identify? Would they typically identify with a religious community? After all, it's all just a bunch of "religious tribes" (Bosniensis).
It will be known these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Person is South Slav for sure, and this is thread about S. Slavic genetic.
Zagreb is actually very Croatian, very homogenous for capital city standards. Coastal cities are more mixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leto