I'm from the Algarve so it makes sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nassbean
Printable View
I'm from the Algarve so it makes sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nassbean
Gallic Chariot Burials
Code:Bucy-le-Long Gallic Chariot Burial France
BFM265 (400 BC)
mtDNA Haplogroup: U2e1b2
(You do not match this sample)
Attichy-Bitry Gallic Chariot Burial France
ATT26 (275 BC)
mtDNA Haplogroup: H8
Genetic Distance: 13.543
Sample Match! 86% closer than other users
Some of my results from this French week for an Andalusian like me
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uwDbaC6rz...NOO1real2.jpeg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Df2zx0Cjo...cePSS4170.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jANh61dTh...ancePECH8.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xVNl4LaH0...iotBurial.jpeg
8. Dolmen de Saint-Eugene Bronze Age France (1950 BC) ..... 10.28 - EUG11 -
14. Aquitani Pech-Maho France (350 BC) ..... 10.9 - PECH8
20. Le Mans Revolutionary France (1793 AD) ..... 11.51 - LM_406_T
34. Rec de Ligno Bronze Age France (2050 BC) ..... 12.31 - PIR3037AB
38. Le Pirou Valros Bronze Age France (1630 BC) ..... 12.59 - Pir6
41. Belgic Tribe Colmar France (340 BC) ..... 12.77 - COL153i -
43. Neolithic France (3500 BC) ..... 13.25 - PEN001_real2
57. Pont-sur-Seine Bronze Age France (2100 BC) ..... 13.83 - PSS4170
79. Crusader Knight French / Lebanon (1250 AD) ..... 14.61 - SI-40
94. Belgic Tribe Erstein France (250 BC) ..... 15.2 - ERS1164 -
95. Quinquiris Bronze Age Aude France (1500 BC) ..... 15.21 - QUIN234
96. Marseilles Plague Victim (1721 AD) ..... 15.24 - OBS137
101. Iron Age Erstein France (250 BC) ..... 15.45 - ERS86
105. Bronze Age Niederergheim France (860 BC) ..... 15.62 - NIED
107. Quinquiris Bronze Age Aude France (1200 BC) ..... 15.68 - QUIN58
111. Belgic Tribe Nordhouse France (500 BC) ..... 15.85 - NOR3-6 -
113. Rixheim Bronze Age Alsace France (1690 BC) ..... 15.95 - RIX4
114. Ligurian Pech-Maho France (350 BC) ..... 15.95 - PECH5
121. Medieval France Saint-Laurent-de-la-Cabrerisse (1348 AD) ..... 16.23 - SLC1006
126. Le Mans Revolutionary France (1793 AD) ..... 16.35 - LM_306_T
145. Rixheim Bronze Age Alsace France (1650 BC) ..... 16.86 - RIX15
157. Relic French King Louis XVI (1793 AD) ..... 17.27 - LXVI
162. Le Peyrou Agde France (300 BC) ..... 17.44 - PEY163
172. Marseilles Plague Victim (1721 AD) ..... 17.64 - OBS116
181. Jean-Paul Marat Revolutionary France (1793 AD) ..... 17.92 - Marat
196. Neolithic France (3500 BC) ..... 18.58 - OBN003
203. Rixheim Bronze Age Alsace France (1650 BC) ..... 18.79 - RIX2
224. Le Peyrou Agde France (175 BC) ..... 19.41 - PEY53
who are this people?
https://i.imgur.com/HN8GZVv.jpg
if u google find the pic this is what u get: El mito de al Ándalus: orígenes y actualidad de un ideal culturalQuote:
Originally Posted by Seya
So the pic is related to al andalus
yeah thought so but i wasn't sureQuote:
Originally Posted by Axios
My new one.
https://i.imgur.com/vA9PoJN.png
I notice the tribes I have the highest matches with are similar to my test results from 24 genetics. Lots of North German and French.
My
Safavid (3.87)
Pontic + Safavid (11.84)
Seleucid (12.35)
Ottomans (12.37)
Seleucid + Safavid (13.4)
Ottoman + Safavid (14.72)
Wow, now my top matches are predominantly Hungarian Conqueror and lots of Scythian which is dope
Scythian + Hungarian Conqueror (6.276)
Gaul + Hungarian Conqueror (9.24)
Frank + Hungarian Conqueror (10.72)
Thuringii + Hungarian Conqueror (11.02)
Scythian + Gaul (12.45)
Scythian (14.79)
Gaul (15.72)
Hungarian Conqueror (18.26)
Frank (18.73)
Thuringii (19.07)
https://i.imgur.com/A6Ibyq4.png
Upgraded PCA map as well:
https://i.imgur.com/4WTbGPz.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris596
Scythian just means Slav on MT
Bullshit as always
https://i.ibb.co/Q6LLg1Z/Ads-z.png
U are RumQuote:
Originally Posted by Kaspias
Deal with it
xD
I'm Thracian, not Seleucid and Pontic lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Bosniensis
Who knows where Thracians lived in Ancient Past, if you classify Selucus I Nicator who is "Selucid" he looks very different than modern people in that area.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaspias
You must consider the possibility that Thracians ruled over Anatolia.
I've been highly recommended for the Ancestor's Test by this company. I got Ancestry and MyHeritage, and, I am considering uploading my file to 24Genetics to get more accurate results, as, I have quite a few discrepancies on the tests I have done so far.
I've been highly recommended for the Ancestor's Test by this company. I got Ancestry and MyHeritage, and, I am considering uploading my file to 24Genetics to get more accurate results, as, I have quite a few discrepancies on the tests I have done so far.
My results:
Roman Hispania + Mayan (6.29)
Illyrian + Mayan (6.536)
Aquitani + Mayan (7.017)
Aquitani + Aztec (7.32)
Roman Hispania + Aztec (7.557)
Top ten matches:
1. Medieval Nabburg Germany (1350 AD) ..... 21.83 - NAB004A
Top 10 % match vs all users
2. Cocoliztli Aztec Mexico (1545 AD) ..... 26.35 - TP14 - ?
Top 99 % match vs all users
3. Iron Age Russia (300 BC) ..... 26.89 - Rise492 -
Top 10 % match vs all users
4. Marseilles Plague Victim (1721 AD) ..... 27.43 - OBS110 - ?
Top 16 % match vs all users
5. Mayan Mexico (1990 AD) ..... 27.56 - Maya8
Top 99 % match vs all users
6. Native American Washington State (6300 BC) ..... 27.77 - Kennewick
Top 99 % match vs all users
7. Alemanni Celtic Warrior (605 AD) ..... 28.04 - NS10 - ?
Top 8 % match vs all users
8. Hungarian Conqueror Karos II (900 AD) ..... 28.29 - K2per36_GE -
Top 9 % match vs all users
9. Late-Roman Era Montefrio Granada (500 AD) ..... 28.36 - I3575 -
Top 7 % match vs all users
10. Crusader Knight Tuscan / Lebanon (1250 AD) ..... 28.69 - SI-41 -
Top 7 % match vs all users
Family's from El Salvador and Spain/France, but to be honest, I'm surprised I'm not very closely related to any samples currently besides the Amerindian ones.
Kievan Rus + Early Slav (6.295)
Baltic + Scythian (6.482)
Baltic + Kievan Rus (7.248)
Kievan Rus (7.61)
Scythian + Early Slav (7.936)
Viking + Early Slav (8.297)
Early Slav (11.17)
Viking (14.27)
Baltic (16.73)
Scythian (17.19)
Byzantine + Gaul (9.305)
Byzantine + Roman (10.18)
Seleucid + Gaul (10.69)
Seleucid + Roman (11.99)
Roman + Ottoman (12.44)
Roman (15.3)
Seleucid (16.62)
Ottoman (17.43)
Byzantine (17.58)
Gaul (17.8)
Sarmatian + Kievan Rus (9.268)
Scythian + Sarmatian (11.25)
Sarmatian + Hungarian Conqueror (12.12)
Sarmatian + Avar (13.63)
Scythian + Kievan Rus (13.79)
Sarmatian (14.97)
Scythian (16.91)
Kievan Rus (18.1)
Hungarian Conqueror (20.0)
1. Tatar (12.52)
2. East_Finnish (13.86)
3. Kargopol_Russian (14.37)
4. Erzya (14.72)
5. Ukrainian (17.10)
6. Finnish (17.30)
7. Ukrainian_Lviv (17.47)
8. Moldavian (17.91)
Byzantine + Roman (6.454)
Byzantine + Gallo-Roman (6.803)
Byzantine + Gaul (7.319)
Byzantine + Hellenic Roman (11.14)
Gaul + Hellenic Roman (11.84)
Roman (12.16)
Byzantine (15.2)
Gaul (18.13)
Hellenic Roman (18.42)
Gallo-Roman (18.61)
Viking + Longobard (4.734)
Viking + Scythian (8.055)
Viking + Ostrogoth (8.937)
Viking (8.967)
Scythian + Longobard (9.298)
Viking Icelandic + Scythian (10.24)
Ostrogoth (13.33)
Scythian (14.08)
Longobard (14.56)
Viking Icelandic (15.41)
Ancient. PCA
This is what my Asia map looks like now. Southeast Asia. I get results from there in almost any calculator. Even G25 assigns some Indonesian and Indochinese to me. Also to my father (and he gets Thai and Cambodian for example in many calculators).
But how is this possible? Did some of the Turkic tribes who settled in East Europe in the past, actually have some Southeast Asian-like ancestry? What about Turkish people? Are there other Hungarians who get Southeast Asian on Vahaduo, GEDmatch or in any other commercial DNA test report?
FTDNA did say I have some Southeast Asian ancestry, although that is a conservative estimate. I also match a sample found in the Philippines but Dr. Maul said that's an ancient Mongolic sample.
Any thoughts on this?
https://i.imgur.com/NRtVYEY.jpg
Double
Closest Ancient Populations:
AncestryDNA kit:
- Belgae + Frank (2.338)
- Celt + Frank (2.79)
- Viking Danish + Frank (3.603)
- Celt + Belgae (3.898)
- Saxon + Frank (3.955)
- Frank (6.485)
- Belgae (6.633)
- Celt (7.513)
- Viking Danish (8.007)
- Saxon (10.25)
23andMe kit:
- Belgae + Frank (2.765)
- Celt + Frank (3.341)
- Belgae + Saxon (3.696)
- Viking Danish + Belgae (3.703)
- Saxon + Frank (4.103)
- Celt (6.744)
- Frank (7.148)
- Belgae (7.766)
- Viking Danish (8.619)
- Saxon (9.473)
Ancient Populations Averages (calculated by finding the averages of the differences between my AncestryDNA and 23andMe kits. It doesn't add up to 100%, but it does round up to 100%, so...):
Celts 35%
Danish Vikings 14.45%
Franks 14.05%
Saxons 11.55%
Belgae 10.17%
Vikings (Swedish) 2.735%
Vandals 2.33%
Ostrogoths 2.21%
Visigoths 2.035%
Vikings (Icelandic) 1.345%
Thuringii 0.98%
Gauls 0.965%
Scythians 0.865%
Longobards 0.635%
Illyrians 0.155%
Vascones 0.155%
Gallo-Romans 0.09%
Matching Sample Locations
- Czechia
- Denmark
- England
- France
- Germany
- Hungary
- Iceland
- Ireland
- Italy
- Moldova
- The Netherlands
- North America
- Poland
- Scotland
- Spain
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Ukraine
interesting. I have seen such resultsQuote:
Originally Posted by Chris596
Right, it indicates something nevertheless.Quote:
Originally Posted by tipirneni
Ancient Deep Dive Breakdown:
Romans: 43.2%
Gallo-Romans: 12.7%
Illyrians: 11.6%
Carthaginians: 6.33%
Thracians: 6.27%
Franks: 5.13%
Phoenicians: 4.51%
Ancient Egyptians: 3.58%
Thuringii: 2.83%
Gauls: 2.09%
Al-Andalus: 1.5%
My fake ancestry gives me Viking, West Estonian ancestry and old Germanic tribes. Frustrating, because my ancestry is fully (over 98% according 23andme) Finnish. I would appreciate to see Estonian, Scandinavian, Slavic Saami and East Finnish results to estimate the method and samples. Maybe I do it myself using academic samples.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/vyuEX4HF6hdZLwZX7
Good that you realized what it is. Better later than never.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemminkäinen
Lol, don't throw it away yet. It is only my usual manner to question things, because so much earns it. I made those tests, selecting random academic samples and I can say that no smoke without fire. Because these are absolutely random academic samples from three ethnicities, I can't even assure that all these represent averages, they are just what researchers offer us. Look how the Mari sample shows pre-Hungarian ancestry, the Swedish sample is close me as to the Viking Age, but his/her earlier history differs from my history. Where my earlier history is West Estonian, the Swede has it in Central Europe. But I am 98% Finnish according 23andme and my ydna side has lived in Finland at least 2000 years. Is this an evidence about partial common ancestry of Roman Iron Age Finns and Swedes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukasz
I am only a messenger in this case, don't shoot me.
If someone is interesting in this matter, I can continue as a messenger.
Me:
http://www.elisanet.fi/mauri_my/kuvat/Lemmi.png
Mari:
http://www.elisanet.fi/mauri_my/kuvat/Mari.png
Swedish:
http://www.elisanet.fi/mauri_my/kuvat/Swede.png
Belarusian:
http://www.elisanet.fi/mauri_my/kuvat/Belarusian.png
Edit
Before all Hollywood-Viking shit hits the fan, I remind that we have really little Swedish yDna in Finland, but we have a lot ancient Scandinavian yDna, all over 2000 years old.
Slavonian Šokac results
Scythian + Early Slav (3.55)
Scythian + Kievan Rus (5.409)
Scythian (6.68)
Viking + Scythian (8.208)
Ostrogoth + Kievan Rus (8.614)
Viking + Kievan Rus (9.431)
Kievan Rus (9.468)
Early Slav (13.31)
Viking (16.72)
Ostrogoth (17.19)
Modern pops:
1. South_Polish (4.460)
2. Ukrainian_Lviv (4.481)
3. Slovenian (4.522)
4. Croatian (4.661)
5. Ukrainian (5.217)
6. Moldavian (7.046)
7. Hungarian (7.500)
8. Polish (7.787)
https://i.imgur.com/4NlbB9L.png
Alan (8.955)
Alan + Safavid (10.33)
Pontic + Alan (15.51)
Pontic + Safavid (16.22)
Updated maps :D
Mine:
https://i.imgur.com/TAYygCo.png
Dads:
https://i.imgur.com/pW6oapp.png
Mums:
https://i.imgur.com/52DTKNW.png
Updated
But Its almost the samehttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...d01b0a3d4d.jpg
Enviado desde mi Redmi Note 7 mediante Tapatalk