Don't distract from the discussed topic. It was about the correct labelling of the kit and if "Niederlausitz" is correct for that or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomenable
Printable View
Don't distract from the discussed topic. It was about the correct labelling of the kit and if "Niederlausitz" is correct for that or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomenable
That was a serious statement, did you really not understand?Quote:
Originally Posted by rothaer
The English enforced English language in Ireland, hoping to Anglicize native Irish people and turn them into English.
The Irish, however, despite losing their language, preserved their ethnic identity, which is now not tied to language.
If national law contradicts European Union law and there is a conflict of laws, then which law has priority? Most of national Constitutions claim that they have priority over EU law, and EU law also claims that it has priority over national Constitutions. Is this high level trolling too?
Stop writing tiresome nonsense. Person in question is German, not Sorbian, and she did not preserve any sense nor knowledge of Sorbian ancestry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomenable
Your pitiful attempts to justify Davidski using fraudulent sample of Lower Sorb (on your advice) is embarassing.
She is German, not a Sorb, Davidski and you made a mistake and are tricking people.
Apologize, be quiet and try to be smarter next time.
Thank you. This really displays your understanding of "science". Manipulating data for getting a nicer and smoother result is ultimately disqualifying someone in a scientific context. And also in the question whether he is at all a serious person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomenable
This sample is neither a Sorb nor from Niederlausitz(!).
You can model all the same with "German_Brandenburg_outlier(Beeskow)". The only difference is that it would be the truth and not Peterska's nice fantasies.
She has fully Sorbian ancestry, I already quoted what her son wrote.
And apparently you are also using a sample of a Klaipeda Region Lithuanian as a German.
I even think Peterska tricked Davidski by telling him it's a Sorb from Niederlausitz and Davidski was not aware of that this was just an interpretation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
In such case you are disqualified from being an ethnic Pole, considering your low early Slavic ancestry compared to real Poles like Lucas and Roy.
On my G25 Slavic calculator Peterska scores same amount of early Slavic as I do, and I am a mixed Croat (Croats are not as genetically Slavic as Poles). Hahah! xD
Target: Lukasz
Distance: 1.7606% / 0.01760596
90.8 (Balto-)Slavic
9.2 Graeco-Roman
Target: Tomenable
Distance: 2.4891% / 0.02489090
59.8 (Balto-)Slavic
20.0 Germanic
14.2 Celtic_like
6.0 Graeco-Roman
Target: Stearsolina
Distance: 1.6472% / 0.01647246
59.6 (Balto-)Slavic
15.4 Balkan
14.8 Graeco-Roman
8.8 Celtic_like
1.4 Turkic
Rothaer just cannot stand that Sven told me that his mother is a Sorb, just like he could not stand (before that) that Kramkowski identifies as Polish (as he wrote on Anthrogenica).
Rothaer wants to be the master & ruler of other peoples' identity...
What if we add Kramkowski as "Polish_East_Prussia" to Global25 ??? :)
By the way, let me guess... Kramkowski is part of your "German_East_Prussia_Masuria" average, right? :)
Even though he identifies as Polish and even migrated back from Germany to Poland and now lives in Poland.