Soon I will uplaod rest genomes. We could compare.
Printable View
Soon I will uplaod rest genomes. We could compare.
I agree, they're dominant admixture is WHG.
Sardinian :HGDP00669
WHG - 54.9
Basal-rich - 44.86
Sub-Saharan - 0.09
Oceanian - 0.03
East_Eurasian - 0.1
Southeast_Asian - 0
ANE - 0
Other two samples are similar, no ANE in Sardinians.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...#gid=759455264
Btw, note that Villabruna has ANE, about 11% ANE admixture. So, that's where all their small ANE admixture could be going.
I have to admit Wadaad has a point. I would like to know how they know these were ethnic Egyptians. That being said, it's not crazy at all to believe they were similar to modern-day Jordanians. That's a very small geographic distance.
Oh, thank God it's just evidence that Egyptians werent some variation of Negro and not something worse. I heard a cry of pain that sounded like Wadaad. I had to check the forum to see if he was okay. Thank God.
So extremely low ssa?
"Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of SSA in post-Roman periods":
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
https://www.nature.com/article-asset...ms15694-s6.pdf
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Interna...0318_wblog.jpg
Ancient Egyptians could (speculating) have produced this type of phenotype according to the the results (he is half-Jewish\half-Arab).