Printable View
0% Amerindian
0% East Asian
0% African
75.3% Atlantic_Baltic
0.1% Australasian
0% Siberian
12.2% Caucasus_Gedrosia
12.3% Southern
0% South Asian
Why do these tests randomly come out with 0.1 Siberian or in this case Australasian? Standard error, or am I part Aboriginal? :D
Dienekes explained in the blog that everyone can expect noise within that range. Those small percentages aren't actual admixture basically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperivm
Don't have to be, but could be. Actually it is uncertainty.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barreldriver
But if comparing individuals in different runs, they have quite often completely different noise below 1 percent, sometimes this, sometimes that, so it is a lot of cases noise and chance alone.
I still don't see a solid justification for this "Gedrossia" component.
Anyone mind doing that calculator thing that says what the given distance for the individual to the reference population is for DOD115, DOD116, and DOD117
My world 9 results from highest to low:
Caucasus_Gedrosia 46.6%
Southern 32%
Atlantic_Baltic 15.5%
Siberian 3.5%
East_Asian 2.2%
Australasian 0.2%
Amerindian 0%
African 0%
South_Asian 0%
The Turkish average:
Amerindian 0.2%
East_Asian 2.3%
African 0.5%
Atlantic_Baltic 21.2%
Australasian 0.4%
Siberian 3%
Caucasus_Gedrosia 39.5%
Southern 32%
South_Asian 1%
K12a
Caucasus: 52.8
Mediterranean: 12.9
Gedrosia:11.9
Southwest Asian:8.8
North European: 8
Siberian : 3
Far Asian : 2.4
Southeast Asian:0.3
South Asian :0
West African: 0
East African: 0
Northwest African:0
Oracle:
[1,] "Armenians" "6.0341"
[2,] "Turks" "6.6955"
[3,] "Armenian_D" "7.8829"
[4,] "Armenians_Y" "8.189"
[5,] "Turkish_D" "8.8657"
[6,] "Azerbaijan_Jews" "11.7231"
[7,] "Assyrian_D" "12.508"
[8,] "Uzbekistan_Jews" "13.9599"
[9,] "Georgia_Jews" "14.4454"
[10,] "Iranian_Jews" "16.7952"
Mixed mode
[1,] "78.8% Armenian_D + 21.2% Nogais_Y" "3.3308"
[2,] "44.8% Armenian_D + 55.2% Turks" "3.3592"
[3,] "56.4% Turks + 43.6% Armenians_Y" "3.4231"
[4,] "94.4% Armenians + 5.6% Buryat" "3.7775"
[5,] "78.5% Armenians_Y + 21.5% Nogais_Y" "3.7796"
[6,] "54% Armenians + 46% Turks" "3.7796"
[7,] "5.2% Oroqen + 94.8% Armenians" "3.7909"
[8,] "94.1% Armenians + 5.9% Mongol" "3.8839"
[9,] "94.5% Armenians + 5.5% Tuva" "3.9265"
[10,] "47.5% Turkish_D + 52.5% Armenians_Y" "3.9338"
So you're basically an Armenian that has adopted Turkic language:p
I may have some Armenian or Georgian ancestry (not that I know of any but assuming) but almost all Turks match with Armenians, Georgians etc...Quote:
Originally Posted by Padre Organtino
Turks, Georgians, Armenians are similar genetically, they cluster similarly in plots. I plot between Turks and Georgians
http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/619...ulpfull201.png
So, how is that against my point?:cool: You cluster genetically close to indigenous populations of the region (Indo-European has been imposed upon Armenians by conquerors). At the same time your language is totally foreign - hence you are aboriginal folks that have abandoned their previous ethnicity and identity for a new one.Quote:
Originally Posted by orangepulp
Did I say it's against your pointQuote:
Originally Posted by Padre Organtino
Present day Turks are dominantly PreTurkic as I stated before. I believe that PreTurkic population of Asia Minor converted to Islam and adapted to the conquerors identity as they were also Muslims therefore assimilated with them and other populations better, resulting to more admixture.