Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Printable View
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Because I1 Anglo-Saxon conquer Roman R1b :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel
But they were slaves and gladiators, they could be at least partially of Germanic origin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
R1ethel hates I1-men, he's just jealous that we are more manly than him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
One guy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
Btw, even if it would be a majority, they still would act as not them.
Just for the recod, Anglosaxons are one of the most denst R1 folks in
the World, on the level of Poles; Danes are up to almost 60% and the
Saxons - 60% R1, plus - if it matters - Dutch are up to 3/4 R1 and the
Frisians over 63%. So, can you explain me, how your IE-looking and an
IE-speaking I1's IE-germanowannabeism works, becasue I can't get it?
By your methodology, R1 totaly does not exist, and everything is a work
of non-R1 subjugated people or even tiny non-R1 minority... It just does
not have any basic sense. Just wishfull thinking. Basques are up to 90%
R1 - but did you see any R1 to claim basqueness per se?
Please, don't input on me words and opinions which I didn;t say neither have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Martnen
It is interesting, what you - and your kinsmen - are saying, as it shows your
own way of perception, as everybody judges according to himself. So you
guys, either hate yourself, either us. Tertium non datur.
And who is saying it... :rolleyes:Quote:
he's just jealous that we are more manly than him.
=> https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4997213 :picard1:
I asked a Hungarian outside this forum about Kurultaj. He said that only people from the 'Turan cringesphere' go there, and that they make up at most 1% of the population.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turul Karom
By the way, do you acknowledge that Hungarians have genetics typical for Central Europe and aren't any more genetically Turkic than their neighbors? It's true that Hungarians score a tiny bit of East Eurasian but so do all your neighbors.
Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
Cringe? Considering over 200,000 people attend it, how could some not be odd in the mix? What group of even 100 people wouldn't have someone who is a bit odd? Look at this website in general, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mingle
The idea of "cringe" is something I don't care one way or the other about; I guess the Nomad games are nothing special too then? Seems pretty popular to me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfbSdPwG41M
As for your genetic question, I've always been ideologically consistent with this. Many times, I have stated that we are very influenced by our neighbors and not a surprise to see how the majority Hungarians genetically cluster in Europe today. Here is a post from even a year ago:
Of course I will answer honestly, friend. I identify easily European. It is a common sense identity; even in a geographical sense, Hungary is certainly not the closest European country to Asia. However, what I would like to point out to you, is the logical fallacies of the notion that one cannot have a"Turanian" mindset and be European at the same time. These identities overlap, and are not mutually exclusive. I would like to point out the Anatolian Turks today, and their own physical appearances and diverse haplogroups, at ranges even wider than found in Hungary. Does this change the ethnogenesis of their culture and their people? Not at all. I would like to reiterate this paragraph for you: "I'll never understand why so many people believe that turkic peoples need to look as if they're 100% east Asian. Not only is it somewhat racist in a laughably ignorant way, it ignores the natural genetic drift of nomadic peoples over time. Are the Germans of 2000 years ago the same "Germans" of today? Of course not. But are they somehow expected to hold the same legacy? Depends on who you ask."
Being absorbed fully into the meta-identity of "Central European" is no different than being succumbing into the identity of "Ottoman", or "Hapsburg", or "Soviet" that our ancestors resisted for centuries. I do not conflate being Hungarian with being Ugyhur, Kazar, Turkmen or Turkish. Nor is being Hungarian French, German, or Scandinavian, however it seems our cosmopolitan friends would occasionally take exception to the truthful exclusion. I am Magyar, and there is a bridge between east and west that is only waiting to be properly fulfilled by Hungary. That's a key pillar of importance of Turanism in the 21st century.
There is no need to shun our pre-settlement past that brought us into existence as an ethnicity in the first place. Western and Eastern sources, modern and ancient, cite the importance Turkic peoples played in our ethnogenesis. As we celebrate this steppe culture, we celebrate the uniqueness of Hungary and the greater Turkic world at large in a fraternal and fun way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turul Karom
In the K11, I was 60% nigger subsaharan. Who take it seriously? These people liguistically genetically anthropologically culturally not related to Hungarians. Hungary has no such traditions. Do you know the meaning of the word "tradition"? Its most important ingredient is the continuity. Even your own hero, the slavo-germanic mixature looking inventor Lajos Kassai recognized in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kzczBq8KCQ, that horse archery is not a tradition in Hungary.
This is the magic link for the escape of turulka: http://tet.rkk.hu/index.php/TeT/article/view/98/195Quote:
Originally Posted by Turul Karom
He always flees to circumlocutium (MELLÉBESZÉLÉS) when he sees it.......