http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v...2015138x11.xls
http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v...2015138x12.xls
Printable View
No, I simply posted the one study that exists on Vlach Y-DNA distribution, which is as expected. What's also expected for it to be misunderstood as an argument on its own. It isn't, that's why I wrote underneath it. No matter the distribution Y-DNA distribution in Vlachs, which is clearly not uniform and which makes total sense unless you're stupid, it's clearly not from them because of historical facts regarding not only South Albania, but the whole of Epirus. The Vlach explanation makes absolutely no sense and is an obvious cope mechanism when the facts point elsewhere.
Epic thread,lol
It only means that the rest of balkans & europe expects albanians to be so pure that finding 10 indivdual cases of I2a feels like a tragic news to them and they feel responsible to hold us accountable for it. Which i can understand;)
Dema what does "ISN" stand for in the table?
Which study are you referring to and what's the percentage? It's very likely that you've already been told because to anyone with a brain functional enough to do basic math it should be very, very easy to figure out the number of 104 Tosks that had I2a going by the percentage of Tosks in this sample with I2a. You are truly something.