Scytho-Turkic Z93 branch Z2125 vs. Indo-Aryan migration theory

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Arhat

I would prefer to be an African than to be a confused wannabe sumerian-scythian-mongolic-turanian-whatever. Lol Anatolia is the nation of mongrels and a mix of the most ugliest crap you get in this world. Stop claiming Scythian ancestry and better also stop claiming Turkic ancestry . YOU ARE JUST A LOCAL gypsy WHO CAN NOT ACCEPT THAT.

---

Says the mongrel who thinks all human beings who carry the R1a haplogroup are brothers xD Tell you what, you probably got that R1a with rape. And I assume your proud R1a carrier Russkie ancestors were brothers and sisters. It is explain your brain damage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Witness

Only Turks can claim to be Scythian, Massagets descent as historical and genetic things show. DNA tests to modern Turks also reveal Scyths Massagets people genetics as there is a parallel in Mongoloid and North Eurasian genes in Turks, NE 1,5 to 2 times higher always and when Mongoloid low NE also low. So Scythians were majority NE genes with minority West Asian like their mummies show. Oghuz Turkic hordes coming here thousand year ago were like 1/3 Mong. 1/2 NE and rest West Asian.

---

Iranians can claim on it too, also you're only partly descendants of Scythians, you're also heavily iranized by other Iranic groups. The Turks simply copy pasted the Scythians a lot, except language, culture and behaviour.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zoran

Iranians can claim on it too, also you're only partly descendants of Scythians, you're also heavily iranized by other Iranic groups. The Turks simply copy pasted the Scythians a lot, except language, culture and behaviour.

---

You are not in a position to speak on behalf of neither Iranians nor Scythians Kurd. It's non of your bussines. Fuck off.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zoran

Iranians can claim on it too, also you're only partly descendants of Scythians, you're also heavily iranized by other Iranic groups. The Turks simply copy pasted the Scythians a lot, except language, culture and behaviour.

---

This doesnt matter as Oghuzes were the main descents of Scythians, mixed with Huns. Two prestigious people mixed into one and creation of Oghuz Turks who also became prestigious as you consider Seljuks, Ottomans ending with Turkey. Scythians, Massagets could be Indo European but not Iranians I think. Also I don't have Iranic ancestry as I don't have any Kurdish, Zaza, Persian, Armenian ancestry. I am not even Anatolian so this couldn't happen in the last thousand year either way

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Witness

This doesnt matter as Oghuzes were the main descents of Scythians, mixed with Huns. Two prestigious people mixed into one and creation of Oghuz Turks who also became prestigious as you consider Seljuks, Ottomans ending with Turkey. Scythians, Massagets could be Indo European but not Iranians I think. Also I don't have Iranic ancestry as I don't have any Kurdish, Zaza, Persian, Armenian ancestry. I am not even Anatolian so this couldn't happen in the last thousand year either way

---

Why do you even bother to argue this subject with him?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Witness

This doesnt matter as Oghuzes were the main descents of Scythians, mixed with Huns. Two prestigious people mixed into one and creation of Oghuz Turks who also became prestigious as you consider Seljuks, Ottomans ending with Turkey. Scythians, Massagets could be Indo European but not Iranians I think. Also I don't have Iranic ancestry as I don't have any Kurdish, Zaza, Persian, Armenian ancestry. I am not even Anatolian so this couldn't happen in the last thousand year either way

---

It is widely known that both the Scythians and Massagataes were Iranian. The Iranic speaking ethnicities are all Indo-Iranians, likewise with the Scythians and Massagatae, they later split up into two language groups, West and East. All Iranic speaking groups have some connection to eachother, doesn't neccesarily mean they have to speak the same language, look the same or have 100% the same genetics. The Turks are a hybrid race of Iranian (most likely Scythian) and Mongol ancestry. This doesn't mean you can claim to be the rightful descendants of the Scythians. Your language, culture, appearance and even genetics prove this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zoran

It is widely known that both the Scythians and Massagataes were Iranian. The Iranic speaking ethnicities are all Indo-Iranians, likewise with the Scythians and Massagatae, they later split up into two language groups, West and East. All Iranic speaking groups have some connection to eachother, doesn't neccesarily mean they have to speak the same language, look the same. They have 100% the same genetics. The Turks are a hybrid race of Iranian (most likely Scythian) and Mongol ancestry. This doesn't mean you can claim to be the rightful descendants of the Scythians. Your language, culture, appearance and even genetics prove this.

---

%100 Same Genetics!!!??

http://media.giphy.com/media/O5NyCibf93upy/giphy.gif

You are slowly showing your true face and intelligence. :laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ölüezgi

You are not in a position to speak on behalf of neither Iranians nor Scythians Kurd. It's non of your bussines. Fuck off.

---

Well I can make it my business as much as I can butthurt Turk :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ölüezgi

%100 Same Genetics!!!??

http://media.giphy.com/media/O5NyCibf93upy/giphy.gif

You are slowly showing your true face and intelligence. :laugh:

---

I was using examples you dumbwit, are you still enjoying yourself over a serious discussion? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zoran

I was using examples you dumbwit, are you still enjoying yourself over a serious discussion? :rolleyes:

---

I swear to God I'm really laughing infront of my computer. Allah will award you for this. xD