Quote:
So they repeat the same mistake(s) that was already done by the forerunners.
From the results posted above, we can infer that the similarity metrics rely on IBS scores between pseudo-haploid genomes of ancient samples and fully diploid genomes of modern reference groups, which is rather nonsensical.
For the words of wisdom were spelled out:
1) Thou shalt not compare pseudo-haploids against diploids - render unto haploids the things that are haploids, and unto diploids the things that are diploids"
2) Thou shalt not take genomewide ancestry and IBS metrics for estimating ancestry in vain.
