Krajina Serb (from Banija) results

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ph2ter

Probably in the 7th century there was no genetical difference between Serbs and Croats.

---

Maybe you are right...Many times Srbs and Croats used like acronim for eachother..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HungryLion

Lusatian Serbs just got the name of these I2a1b Serbs.
Ikavian dialect is compicated and can't be considered to much than stocavian. Still PH908 is always in huge % among the Serbs, and Among the Croats you can find it only in regions where was Serbian presence.
If not migration of Croats from south to north-western Croatia PH908 will be like 10% Among kajkavian Croats.

---

Lets say that everything you have ever said is true. What then? What do you want?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dick

I tried this. Your subclade ends up in Ukraine 450AD

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...-map-generator

---

Proto-Slavic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić

It is highest in Central Dalmatia in Croatia where never existed Serbian presence. Some Croatian Islands are over 50% I2-dinaric.

---

The Island full of migration from east herzegovina.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić

Bastarnae ?

---

Could be, could be left over goths, could be left over dacians, not really sure yet. But I don't believe that ph908 carries came down in the 5th century with everyone else, the distribution is too weird within the balkans, and other balkan nations which have significant i2 like Greece, Macedonia and Bulgaria are almost entirely din-north which I find weird. Even that stupid map has my subclade in Romania pre 100AD and in Serbia (raska) in 300AD.

I definitely think its wrong either way to correlate ph908 with proto Serbs or proto Croats, it simply follows a dinaric distribution across former-YS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Insuperable

Lets say that everything you have ever said is true. What then?

---

Well it isn't. Like Leeloo said White Croats settled in Dalmatia. We in the north descend from Panonnian Slavs.
So it is obvious proto-Croats genetics will be found in North-Central Dalmatia and not in Zagorje.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić

Well it isn't. Like Leeloo said White Croats settled in Dalmatia. We in the north descend from Panonnian Slavs.
So it is obvious proto-Croats genetics will be found in Dalmatia and not in Zagorje.

---

I don't care is it or is it not. I wonder what they want to accomplish. They are so pathetic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Insuperable

Lets say that everything you have ever said is true. What then? What do you want?

---

I am not sure, money is always welcome even if I have, but who know what can happend, right? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ayetooey

Could be, could be left over goths, could be left over dacians, not really sure yet. But I don't believe that ph908 carries came down in the 5th century with everyone else, the distribution is too weird within the balkans, and other balkan nations which have significant i2 like Greece, Macedonia and Bulgaria are almost entirely din-north which I find weird. Even that stupid map has my subclade in Romania pre 100AD and in Serbia (raska) in 300AD.

I definitely think its wrong either way to correlate ph908 with proto Serbs or proto Croats, it simply follows a dinaric distribution across former-YS.

---

Mate, first Slavic Balkan states were founded in dinaric alps. Din-N is older.
If they were some kind of Germanic, assimilation happened before coming south imo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić

Well it isn't. Like Leeloo said White Croats settled in Dalmatia. We in the north descend from Panonnian Slavs.
So it is obvious proto-Croats genetics will be found in Dalmatia and not in Zagorje.

---

Proto-Croatian genetic mostly migrated from northern Dalmatia towards the northwest in 1520s because of Ottoman invasion.