I agree, but in this context most likely they mean by the term “white” whether the man in general looks like a white person (morphologically) and culturally
Printable View
Why do you care so much about whether if he or anyone else here considers you as "White" or not? This place is full of pseudoscience and self-proclaimed experts who think they know better than the specialists in the field of Anthropology, anywhere in the world you would be considered as "White", period.
Yeah, but again, different people have extremely different standards for both of those things, so we have the same problem as before. Can't generalize like that. Anyway, if we're speaking about individual level, things are gonna get pretty inconsistent pretty fast with that - there are Arabs who looks perfectly European, aswell as Europeans who look more Arab or Mongoloid than your standard European. Also, then there's the issue with variety within a single family. Look at Toppo, he would easily pass for an European, but his family wouldn't. The possibility that different people with the same ancestry can be labeled as either white or non-white is ridiculous. On a level of whole nations, if white means something like 'large enough majority of them would pass for some European' - then yeah, Caucasians are probably an example of non-European whites. I like how this is getting more clear if we actually define our terms first. But when we mix the cultural aspect in, things may get messy again - the culture of Caucasian nations is quite close to Eastern European, but whether enough to be considered 'white' is again going to vary a lot, depending on whom you'll ask.
Speaking only about looks there is quite a difference between Chechens for example, and Armenians.
yes it's all wizards.