Map of Europe showing WHG, Baltic HG, Yamnaya and Neolithic ancestry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by J.S.

I' like to see, how score Bronze and Iron Age Iberian samples. Some French ones score more than 2% MAR_Taforalt.

---

Never see a French with significative Iberomaurusien (70% levant 30% subsaharian).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flashball

Never see a French with significative Iberomaurusien (70% levant 30% subsaharian).

---

Iberomaurusian is not 70 percent levant and 30 percent sub saharan lmao

Some ancient French samples show a signal of MAR_Taforalt component, etc. It's no big deal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by J.S.

Some ancient French samples show a signal of MAR_Taforalt component, etc. It's no big deal.

---

I know some modern French do, but haven't seen it in any French_IA samples(and yes Taforalt is 70% MENA, 30% SSA, one flawed paper doesn't change that). Which French samples do you refer to?

the calculator is experimental and, like any calc I've seen, needs improvements. I am happy to learn things I didn't know, so thank you to those that took the time to add such details to the thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aherne

Sorry to tell you, but these calculations seem incorrect: where is the indigenous Mesolithic element here (1%: this is fucking ridiculous)? If you ever visited that region you will see its expression at least as (un)common as Corded... IMHO we have history written to our faces: maybe in the future these results will be more accurate but so far (unfortunately) good old racial anthropology yields better results

---

actually I think you are partially right: our specific traits come from specific genes, not genome-wide picture, so if genome-wide mapping can tell us sometimes with great precision where we are from or in case we are a mix, what are our macro-components in terms of ancestry, it doesn't tell us what we may look like, and in the future maybe some tests could look at that as well, to be able to group people on a plot based on similar traits, alone or combined

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XenophobicPrussian

I know some modern French do, but haven't seen it in any French_IA samples(and yes Taforalt is 70% MENA, 30% SSA, one flawed paper doesn't change that). Which French samples do you refer to?

---

One flawed paper according to who? Lmaoooo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by aherne

As always, racial anthropology matches history much better than genetic mumbo-jumbo:)

---

Wrong, it is just that commercial DNA tests are not scientific they don't want to contradict any potentially wrong preconceived notions about customers identity they might have and G25 is amateur mentally retatarded slavic science. Alright, I am being a little too harsh on G25 but the truth is that is too fine-grained especially for modern populations.

So, who is the master of physical anthropology here ? Arguably xenophobic Prussian. He puts me in Wales/Cornwall/Devonshire Britain . So, you don't want more generalized qpAdm/admix results because it's ultra nerdy ? Perfect is the enemy of good enough :


MyTrueAncestry :

1. Southwest_English (4.205)
2. Southeast_English (4.275)
3. North_Dutch (4.390)
4. Danish (4.722)
5. West_Scottish (4.930)
6. Irish (5.014)
7. Orcadian (5.114)
8. North_German (6.151)

Ok, so the average Englishman is probably about 21 percent Celtic/Irish or whatever. However, being from SouthWest England there can be more Celtic input. MTA FTW , again:

30 % Celtic with rest various Germanic tribes e.g. Saxons, Danish vikings, Franks, Norwegian vikings etc..

Is it telling me nerd shit like how much Steppe, WHG, and Baltic HG etc...I am ? No ! However, who cares if G25 is wrong ? Ok, G25 is flexible and nerdy but not always correct so fuck it ! MTA can tell me how much I match to some samples in ancient Britain it seems , as well , but I won't paste it here.

Also , phenotype is only a subset of genes of the underlying genotype so you can't rely solely on old-school anthropology.

The truth is out there my man !

*edit , yeah go ahead clowns continue looking down your noses at MyTrueAncestry ya'll niggers is sleeping on MTA and straight trippin' *

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XenophobicPrussian

I know some modern French do, but haven't seen it in any French_IA samples(and yes Taforalt is 70% MENA, 30% SSA, one flawed paper doesn't change that). Which French samples do you refer to?

---

To be honest, i used an old datasheet with outdated coordinates. When i check the MAR_Taforalt signal in the ancient French samples using the official Eurogenes Global25 datasheet

the signal is very weak.

Attachment 107573

nb: with Nurzat code/calculator

delete