Interesting the Volga and the Finnic tiny bit in your sig. I know it’s fitting and not about being perfectly literal, but why do you suppose you score those?Quote:
Originally Posted by rothaer
Printable View
Interesting the Volga and the Finnic tiny bit in your sig. I know it’s fitting and not about being perfectly literal, but why do you suppose you score those?Quote:
Originally Posted by rothaer
Target: Kenshiro_scaled
Distance: 0.0179% / 0.01791272
50.9 Old_Balkan
26.4 East_Med
11.5 Keltic_Central_Euro
7.6 Germanic
2.3 Turkic_Steppe
1.3 Balto-Slavic
https://i.ibb.co/XF8ZfcD/0cas.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Milenko
I do not see a big discrepancy from the average of samples from wide Royal Prussia.
https://i.ibb.co/G5T8S3M/cass-0-05.png
I think he has probably seen a lot of Eastern Polish calculator results from TA members and therefore he is now confused why you score higher Germanic than them.Quote:
Originally Posted by cass
To Milenko, not only Kashubians but also other Western Poles who lived under Prussia have similar high Germanic results while Poles close to Lithuania/Belarus are very Slavic
Interesting. Does anyone have a more slavic result?
Target: ugo_wife_scaled
Distance: 2.3248% / 0.02324838
92.2 Balto-Slavic
5.6 Volga_Basin
1.8 Turkic_Steppe
0.4 Old_Balkan
Oh, nice. We were just discussing that topic. Let me just check all my Polish samples (especially the ones from the East) if they have more. But I am sure there are someQuote:
Originally Posted by ugochaves
Yes, I found in my samples for example the Polish user LM662072
Here are his results :
Target: Polish:LM662072_scaled
Distance: 2.1741% / 0.02174061
92.4 Balto-Slavic
7.2 Keltic_Central_Euro
0.4 Germanic
My result is very modest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarzyna
Target: ugo_scaled
Distance: 1.5038% / 0.01503779
82.4 Balto-Slavic
15.0 Volga_Basin
2.0 Old_Balkan
0.6 Turkic_Steppe
Target: Moksha
Distance: 1.1289% / 0.01128939
53.8 Balto-Slavic
31.6 Volga_Basin
4.0 East_Med
3.8 Old_Balkan
3.4 Germanic
3.4 Turkic_Steppe
I think both your wife and the user LM662072‘s results are somehow not complete, because look at their bad distance. Mine and your distance is much better and we are less Slavic than them. Something is missing them in their distance, I think they need some extra component.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugochaves
Its worth quoting first passages of Gunther Grass "First there were the Rugiers, then came the Goths and Gepides, followed by the Kashubes, from whom Oskar descends directly. Soon after, the Poles sent Adalbert of Prague. He came with the cross and was slain with the axe by the Kashubes or the Prussian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Katarzyna
Target: Kaspias_scaled
Distance: 2.7016% / 0.02701645
38.6 East_Med
28.6 Balto-Slavic
21.2 Turkic_Steppe
11.6 Keltic_Central_Euro
If remove East_Med it gives a pretty solid result
Target: Kaspias_scaled
Distance: 3.3083% / 0.03308324
51.0 Old_Balkan
24.6 Balto-Slavic
24.4 Turkic_Steppe