Dodecad Ancestry Project

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdealUral

I meant the personal ones, since I want to know my results.

---

Here are individual results:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...hl=en_US#gid=2

K12b results for me

Gedorisha 15.8%
Siberian 1.7%
NorthWest African 2.6%
South East Asian 0%
Atlanto-Med 9%
Northern European 3.1%
South Asian 3%
East African 2.6%
SouthWest Asian 21.1%
East Asian 0.4%
Caucasus 40%
Sub-Saharan 0.7%

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pallantides

But that would mean that also my 1% Siberian could be noise:(

---

Mine too :(:(

K7b


Armenian family member VS. Armenian_D Average

West Asian : 47.2 / 51.7
Southern : 37.3 / 37.1
Atlantic Baltic : 14.1 / 10.8
South Asian : 1.2 / 0.4
Siberian : 0.2 / 0
East Asian : 0 / 0
East African : 0 / 0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdealUral

Where do you find this info by any chance?

---

Google Eurogenes and / or the Dodecad project. The McDonald Project at the University of Illinois also has equivalent information.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pallantides

But that would mean that also my 1% Siberian could be noise:(

---

Indeed. Anyway 1% is nothing and you have other components that are hugely substantial making the "Siberian" score essentially meaningless.

K12b

Me (Portuguese average)

Atlantic_Med - 44.7% (47.5%)
North European - 24% (22.3%)
Caucasus - 13.6% (9.7%)
Northwest African - 8.7% (7.7%)
Gedrosia - 6.2% (6%)
East African - 1.8% (0.1%)
Southwest Asian - 0.7% (5%)
South Asian - 0.3% (0.9%)

Siberian - 0% (0%)
Southeast Asian - 0% (0%)
East Asian - 0% (0%)
Sub Saharan - 0% (0.7%)

Assyrian and Mandaean K12b chart. The Assyrians include members of all three major churches. The two Iraqi Mandaeans are #1 and #5. Two individuals not included in the Dodecad Assyrian population, are included in the chart below (e.g. me, #11).

One thing that's puzzling to me is that both Dedecad and Eurogenes have not, for the most part, segregated participants from population groups that have genome histories significantly different from what is representative as a whole for the country in question. Yes, in Italy, places like Sardinia, Sicily and Northern Italy are (correctly) separated but this has not been the case for regions such as the Canary Islands and some other "unique" populations / sub-ethnicities. It makes a difference especially when dealing with modest sampling totals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pallantides

But that would mean that also my 1% Siberian could be noise:(

---

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/5263/34faceit.gif

:D
No seriously, I would say you look more Asian-mixed than a Central European.