Wow really didnt know that. It still would mean that they are different though.Quote:
Originally Posted by vbnetkhio
Printable View
Wow really didnt know that. It still would mean that they are different though.Quote:
Originally Posted by vbnetkhio
it's because of the new South Croat averages, which turned out to be more south plotting than we believed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dušan
with 34 Baltic you are even more Slavic than the average Bosniak or South Croat who are around 32. so of course you'll get them as #1.
the other way would be to split Serbs into genetic clusters, then you would get Slavic shifted Serbs as #1.
Average Baltic score for Serbs from Croatia is 31%.Quote:
Originally Posted by vbnetkhio
My results are in range for Serbs from Croatia, nothing special and very different from that.
Serb_Krajina,25.39,31.20,16.65,8.69,14.35,1.42,0.6 7,0.27,0.53,0.40,0.33,0.07,0.03
Krajina_Serb_average,24.71,31.76,16.79,8.22,14.62, 1.55,0.43,0.22,0.81,0.56,0.38,0.03,0.03
even if the average is 29 you are still normal, the average +- 5-6 is normal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dušan
well yeah, a little bit more Slavic, but it gets overblown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ljubic
without this filtering commercial test results would look just like gedmatch calculators, but that would be too complicated for their average customer.
To fell from 31.76% on 29.66% when sample is measured in dozens it must appear the dozens of new Montenegrin like results (impossible outside of Montenegro). 2.1% is huge difference on average on the samples of few dozens.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dušan
29 is realistic for Serbs overall (just like I predicted), 31 not.
Croatian Serbs dont have more Baltic than southern or western Croats, get out of your fantasy world.
It seems you guys include people based on surname and it is a joke. Not vbnethkio, talking about nordicist Pribislav
Also, not including Belgrade academic samples because they are "too southern" is clear bias and nothing else. Croats from Zagreb have similar Baltic like Herzegovina, not Zagorje or even central Croatia, so what?
Maybe this Belgrade samples represent common genetics in city with lot of Montenegrin ancestry.
I am not Nordicist neither Balticist and my result are in range for group of Serbs that I belong.
Either delete all regional averages for both Serbs and Croats, and to stay just general values, or to put real Krajina Serb average!
Dušan got 31.76% Baltic for Krajina Serbs on 28 samples, and vbnetkhio claim 29.66% on 53.Quote:
Originally Posted by Est.1992
To this be true, 25 samples between Dušan's 28 and vbnetkhio's 53 must be only 27% Baltic on average which is almost Montenegrin like avarage.