Pure Caucasoid is a " Myth ". Turks, North Africans are less Caucasoid than South Asians.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Your chart doesn't prove anything.

There's no proof cro-magnum are proto-Caucasoids as in ancestors of all Caucasoids. Ancient Europeans even have morphology more closer to modern day South Asians than to modern Europeans. Most Adivasi themselves do not have west Eurasian admixture, they have mostly ASI DNA admixture, only some groups of them have higher Onge admixture more than others.

ASI is Caucasoid morphology phenotype group but were NON-WEST EURASIAN genetically but some of the tribes today from the Adivasi groups have East Asian, Onge admixture to different degrees which altered their their phenotypes.

Sorry to break to you. Dravidians Caucasoids which are indigenous to India were always a pure ASI genetically people although modern Dravidians speakers all have portions West Eurasian admixture pure ASI phenotypes can still be seen only Southern India even it's west Eurasian DNA are from NORTHERN INDIANS mass migration to the South which is nothing related with Europe or Middle east what so ever.

---

I don't believe that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_H_(Y-DNA) The ancestor is Haplogroup GHIJK which came from South West Asia. Of course you ignored all the evidence I presented in the previous videos, it was a lot to watch, all cited sources, seems like you believe the Out of India theory.

From cranial morphology , there is enough evidence they were Caucasoid. http://racialreality.blogspot.ca/201...t-negroid.html I am not interested in this debate anymore. Mentioning Proto-Caucasoids a lot is getting into a debate on human origins, something that is not fully known since the Out of Africa theory is widely regarded to be nonsense, the Out of India theory is nonsense to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnusAurelius

I don't believe that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_H_(Y-DNA) The ancestor is Haplogroup GHIJK which came from South West Asia. Of course you ignored all the evidence I presented in the previous videos, it was a lot to watch, all cited sources, seems like you believe the Out of India theory.

From cranial morphology , there is enough evidence they were Caucasoid. http://racialreality.blogspot.ca/201...t-negroid.html I am not interested in this debate anymore. Mentioning Proto-Caucasoids a lot is getting into a debate on human origins, something that is not fully known since the Out of Africa theory is widely regarded to be nonsense, the Out of India theory is nonsense to.

---

So your source is a blog from a racist pseudo-scientist blogger from racial reality ?

There is no living human being with Haplogroup GHIJK and there's far more chance of it being Veddoid origin since even in ancient South West Asia were inhabited by Veddoid-like population since ancient time even our own very theapricity says that

https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI6.htm <------------- FROM THEAPRICITY, an established facts , not a thread.

Veddoid types from Arabia , even in Central Asia, the earliest humans were of Veddoid types and there were threads about it with anthropology Russian data, which explains why there is a existence of little bit of South Asian DNA

VEDDOIDS FROM ARABIA

http://britam.org/pic2/veddoid.jpg
http://i61.tinypic.com/1j6wco.png
http://i62.tinypic.com/119z9c6.png

Veddoid strain and phenotypes can also be found in Arabia, and the Arabs do have a small Veddoid component themselves, it seems a lot higher in a few people though

http://i46.tinypic.com/20pxcly.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/vnf0xe.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnusAurelius

Mentioning Proto-Caucasoids a lot is getting into a debate on human origins, something that is not fully known since the Out of Africa theory is widely regarded to be nonsense, the Out of India theory is nonsense to.

---

Even if we don't believe in the Indian theory the fact the matters is that ancient population of Central Asia, West Asia, Southwest Asia had a ancient veddoid population, this explains why there is existing small Veddoid component found in all those regions.

American anthropologist Jill Priest and Danigala Vedda Chief Randunu Wanniya ( notice the overall similarity in their head structure? )

http://vedda.org/pix/priest&ratugala-chief600.jpg


Proto-Caucasoid Veddoids in it's perfect form

http://www.serendib.btoptions.lk/cpa...a%209.jpg.JPEG
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XoCl-pX-mu4/hqdefault.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/ed/1b/93/e...50857ff083.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

So your source is a blog from a racist pseudo-scientist blogger from racial reality ?

There is no living human being with Haplogroup GHIJK and there's far more chance of it being Veddoid origin since even in ancient South West Asia were inhabited by Veddoid-like population since ancient time even our own very theapricity says that

https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI6.htm <------------- FROM THEAPRICITY, an established facts , not a thread.

Veddoid types from Arabia , even in Central Asia, the earliest humans were of Veddoid types and there were threads about it with anthropology Russian data, which explains why there is a existence of little bit of South Asian DNA

VEDDOIDS FROM ARABIA

http://britam.org/pic2/veddoid.jpg
http://i61.tinypic.com/1j6wco.png
http://i62.tinypic.com/119z9c6.png

Veddoid strain and phenotypes can also be found in Arabia, and the Arabs do have a small Veddoid component themselves, it seems a lot higher in a few people though

http://i46.tinypic.com/20pxcly.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/vnf0xe.jpg

---

I don't know why racial reality is considered "Pseudo Science" when all the sources are cited. The Apricity site has pseudo-science rejected by the entire scientific community.

http://greek-dna-sub-saharan-myth.org/

While recent studies prove the opposite. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/...nt-dna-reveals

I would rather see ancestral genetic evidence with these people than go by Phenotype, the vast majority of Arabs have 5-10% Sub Saharan admixture depending on the person and some could have more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnusAurelius

I don't know why racial reality is considered "Pseudo Science" when all the sources are cited. The Apricity site has pseudo-science rejected by the entire scientific community.

http://greek-dna-sub-saharan-myth.org/

While recent studies prove the opposite. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/...nt-dna-reveals

I would rather see ancestral genetic evidence with these people than go by Phenotype, the vast majority of Arabs have 5-10% Sub Saharan admixture depending on the person and some could have more.

---

It's pseudo-Science because the idiot blogger bans people's comment for criticizing his own wild interpretations of the genetic study according to his own believes, that's how pathetic he is.

They also have 5-10% South Asian admixture and Sub-Saharan admixture can be as low 2-3% in many Arabs as aswell.

http://i48.tinypic.com/29o5qj5.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

You know what's the problem with your head?


1) You think genetic and anthropologically is the same thing

2) You think Caucasoid is by default Europeans

3) You do not even know what the original Caucasoid or west Eurasian genetically look like



ASI people have Caucasoid like morphology. The problem with you is you judge those pictures in those people as non-Caucasoid for their skin color and appearance.

Their morphology is Caucasoid and skin color is just a superficial trait. Even these albino will make your Italians look like non-Europeans since many people considers Italian especially south Italian as Arabian/North African mixed for their darker skin, dark hair and eyes.

https://s16.postimg.org/5ahjf3vdh/al...n-europans.jpg
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]


Also let me give you an idea what ancient proto-Caucasoids look like


Ancient Caucasoid morphologies in Europe are different to the ones in Europe today.

[img][/img]
[img][/img]


[video/video]

---

Are you sure girl on right side is Indian? It is unlikely (not totally impossible I suppose) she is South Asian. I searched in Google, but could not find out who exactly she is, but probably she is Russian, Czech or German as she was on their sites including on a Nazi German site as an example of a Aryan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

It's pseudo-Science because the idiot blogger bans people's comment for criticizing his own wild interpretations of the study, that's how pathetic he is.

They also have 5-10% South Asian admixture and Sub-Saharan admixture can be as low 2-3% in many Arabs as aswell.

http://i48.tinypic.com/29o5qj5.jpg

---

That is what I thought with this. So much non-Caucasoid admixture.

http://racialreality.blogspot.ca/201...sis-at-k6.html

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/bior...1/001552-2.pdf On this, it yielded similar results for the K6.

https://imgur.com/a/c7Eid If you can't zoom in on it, it is here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by turbosat

Are you sure girl on right side is Indian? It is unlikely (not totally impossible I suppose) she is South Asian. I searched in Google, but could not find out who exactly she is, but probably she is Russian, Czech or German as she was on their sites including on a Nazi German site as an example of a Aryan.

---

Well all I did was just type "Indian albino" or "Veddoid albino" in google's images and she showed up. Her hairstyle is typical of many young Indian school girls.

I would believe she's real because I saw many Indians looking something like that, there are some who are not even albino but depigmented but look straight up like a North European.

I've seen them in a Indian TV documentary plenty of times.

Kamna, age 5, with her parents

http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net...2155__2__0.jpg
http://mediad.publicbroadcasting.net...403_122120.jpg


Not even albino at all, just depigmented. Albino skin color are way more whiter than this.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b1/5b...1885336ded.jpg

This is an albino, very white skinned. She looks like a Northern European girl or even look like European girl suffering albinism even though she's Indian. Most people can't distinguish many Indian albino and European albino from eachother.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/medias.photo...077_xlarge.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagnusAurelius

That is what I thought with this. So much non-Caucasoid admixture.

http://racialreality.blogspot.ca/201...sis-at-k6.html

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/bior...1/001552-2.pdf On this, it yielded similar results for the K6.

https://imgur.com/a/c7Eid If you can't zoom in on it, it is here.

---

I'm not even going to read those links because it's getting so off topic. Do you even understand the original point of my thread ?

I'm not here to discuss where proto-Caucasoid originated. I'm only proving that South Asians are as Caucasoid as any other populations anthropologically.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

I'm not even going to read those links because it's getting so off topic. Do you even understand the original point of my thread ?

I'm not here to discuss where proto-Caucasoid originated. I'm only proving that South Asians are as Caucasoid as any other populations anthropologically.

---

Which is 100% wrong and why you constantly cherry pic photo's of Individuals from isolated Tribes that look Caucasoid, it's obvious they were a mixed group. ASI is a mixed component.

http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/5331473/1/ I was reading through this.