theres no way a person from eastern med or caucasus is 14% subsaharan african. unless if they count levantine dna as subsaharan, which itself is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thalassa
Printable View
theres no way a person from eastern med or caucasus is 14% subsaharan african. unless if they count levantine dna as subsaharan, which itself is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thalassa
Gedmatch is better.
https://image.ibb.co/hJOHDd/ftdna.png
Could be. I'm going to take a more detailed ancestory DNA test and post the results here later.Quote:
Originally Posted by mongrel
Which company did you use to get your DNA test?Quote:
Originally Posted by Thalassa
DDC (DNA Diagnostics Center)Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDACHE
da fuck. that site looks like it was created by a 5 year old using microsoft paint.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thalassa
Yup.Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDACHE
Great Britain 24%
Europe East 21%
Ireland/Scotland/Wales 18%
Europe West 13%
Iberian Peninsula 11%
Low Confidence Regions
Europe South 5%
Finland/Northwest Russia 5%
Scandinavia 2%
Caucasus <1%
Middle East <1%
jup, ancestry DNA is so wrong. there are british people who score less british than i do XDDD i had 48-72% british of which they averaged 60%, they only gave me 3-6% middle eastern and 2-4% central asian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaspias
also, only my british %, my ghanaian % and my congolese % were not in the low confidence region.
i literally have 10 populations in the low confidence region XD and they say ancestry is a good test. gfys lolw