Gencove Ancestry Results Update

It's weird how Non-Swedish Norwegians are. So much closer to Danes?

A totally mess in my case. I got 38% native american and my western african just dissapears LOL. And they added 12% of northern italy.

Maybe Iceland shouldn't really be part of Scandinavian cluster because they are a mix of Scandinavian and British-Irish ancestry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hadouken

according to 23andme I have a british or irish ancestor in the 1700-1800s or so :lol:

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galatians_(people)

It seems better than previous version however it is still an awful calculator.

a person from other forum who all his ancestors
from southwest germany and western germany :
northen and central europe -48%
southwestern europe 26%
scandinavia 11%
northeast europe 9%
northen italy 4%
2% northeast asia could be noise or something

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kingjohn

lol :rotfl:
what about eastern poles can you please ask mlukasz to upload his raw data to this gencove nounsense :)

---

I would like to see his results.

But here is a comparison of our K47 results (I'm TomFTDNA):

https://i.imgur.com/Be06NKD.png

vv_rus = Russian*
Lukasz = Eastern Pole
TomFTDNA= Western Pole
celticgerman = German

PCA with PC1 and PC2 (but don't be too quick to think in a "geographical way", as these 2 components load only 59% of the total variance; in order to see 100% of the total variance with K47, we would need to see 47 dimensions):

https://i.imgur.com/Be06NKD.png

*Mother from Central Russia, father from North-West Russia.

Slovak1 is Karol.Klacansky's dad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Albannach

(...)

---

Check your e-mail.

BTW, I uploaded VCF file from Gencove to Genesis Gedmach and my results are really funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Litvino

Your K47 results (proportions of "Celtic" to "Germanic" shouldn't be interpreted literally because for example ancient Celtic samples also score "Germanic" in this calculator, just not as much as ancient Germanic samples):

0.00% Kushitic
5.71% North-Iberian
3.97% East-Iberian
0.00% Tibeto-Burman
0.16% North-African
1.42% South-Caucasian
3.76% North-Caucasian
1.85% Paleo-Balkan
0.00% Turkic-Altai
0.00% Proto-Austronesian
0.00% Nilotic
0.00% East-Med
0.00% Omotic
0.00% Munda
0.00% North-Amerind
0.00% Arabic
11.24% East-Euro
0.00% Central-African_HG
0.00% Andean
0.00% Indo-Chinese
0.00% South-Indian
0.00% NE-Asian
0.53% Volgan
0.00% Mongolian
0.00% Siberian
18.92% North-Sea_Germanic
23.97% Celtic
0.00% West-African
4.16% West-Finnic
1.22% Uralic
0.00% Sahelian
0.00% NW-Indian
0.00% East-African_HG
0.00% East-Asian
0.00% Amuro-Manchurian
14.74% Scando-Germanic
0.00% Iranian
0.00% South-African_HG
0.00% Amazonian
6.29% Baltic
0.00% Malay
0.00% Meso-Amerind
0.00% South-Chinese
0.05% Papuan
0.00% West-Med
0.00% Pamirian
2.00% Central-Med

---

Thanks mate!. The results are much what I was expecting really, thought I might get a bit more Celtic but the results are overall very similar to Gedmatch calculators I have used. Except the Urallic and Finnic which is something I've never seen in any results so far. My Scandanavian seems to be quite consistent on most calculators, between 13%-16% and I imagine the Finnic was probably brought with the Vikings too. Thanks for taking the time to do this for me Litvin, much appreciated.