ArR1ba, fellow native tR1besmen of the West!!!
Down with aR1an oppression!
(Anyone got any more of these acronym-puns? I love em! :p)
Printable View
ArR1ba, fellow native tR1besmen of the West!!!
Down with aR1an oppression!
(Anyone got any more of these acronym-puns? I love em! :p)
I belong to R1a1a.
My paternal line came to Virginia from England in the early 1600s. Appears to be a rare variety of R1a1a. No matches on ftDNA or ysearch.org. Nor do I match any of the types on the website Eburos sourced.
I must admit I was very disappointed to find out I was a subclade of R1b, I was hoping that I belonged to the noble N1c.
R1b1b2a1a1* here
R1baldry!
Anyone know of any other matches to my R1b sequence?
DYS19 @ 14
DYS 388 @ 12
DYS 390 @ 22
DYS 391 @ 10
DYS 392 @ 12
DYS 393 @ 13
DYS 389i @ 09
DYS 389ii-i @ 17
DYS 425 @ 12
DYS 426 @ 11
I'm curious about it as the only exact match I have been put onto by the company I went with (Oxford Ancestors) is from the Orkney Islands and that it cannot be assigned an exact sub-clade. Unfortunately they do not give out personal details so I can't make enquiries that end with my genetic cousin. Others who have looked have claimed it doesn’t appear in any of the Irish records. I’m wondering given that my surname has a (son) prefix, which is Scandinavian and that the best evidence suggests it originates from Norman settlers in south-west Scotland, if this is a Norse marker.
Appreciate any help.:)
I couldn't help but notice that over 28% of the R1b haplogroup have been banned from the forum.
I1 holds the second place with 20% being banned from the forum.
While 0% of the other haplogroups have succumbed to such a fate.
Perhaps more members should list there haplogroups on this poll so that conclusions can not be drawn against these belligerent members common haplogroup.:lightbul:
Hey, I'm not saying that I'd mind if us aR1ans get preferential treatment. :D