Since it's 900-1000 AD, maybe Magyars? Poland has 10% N1c from somewhere. Probably more Magyar admixture than Hungary.
Printable View
Generally those results are of course from smaller number of snps. And in such case minor regional components are usually lacking. But those which stayed show obvious trends in specific genomes. If somebody was mostly NW-Euro he has elevated to enormous level North Sea frequency for example, but I'm sure with bigger number of snps he would be still NW-Euro but more averaged.
I agree that Niemcza looks Baltic influneces from some reason.
Acually we had some hungarian settlement, especially in southern Poland, but also farther,
sometimes leaving behind place's names containgng ther ethnonim, but not always, BUT 1.
impact of general population was very low, becasue the settlement was very few in number
comparing to general population 2. 99.53% of so called Hungarians is not original, i.e. has
different than N hg, 3. majority of polish N is living rather on the north than on the south,
so lofgically, they came rather from people colse to Esthonians and Livs, than Magyars.
According to FT DNA it has 4.45, but it is not representative, and containing mostly pre-IIWW population.
Lebusland has from example 100% of R1 and only 8 specimens :p
So, real % of N is probably lower I guess.
Polish N-hat, called Magierka (i.e. Magyar hat).
Different types depending on original N subethnic root :p
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...%2C_Krakau.JPG
http://www.hobby-welna.pl/media/prod...?lm=1473933465
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NCP3ei26Hs...2Bmagierka.png
http://www.hobby-welna.pl/media/prod...?lm=1467345622
http://etnomuzeum.eu/file/obiekty/139pb_322.jpg
http://www.hobby-welna.pl/media/prod...?lm=1466791463
http://www.hobby-welna.pl/media/prod...?lm=1466738278