Printable View
I simply associated certain admixture components with each Anthropologically defined race before. It isn't fully known what ASI is yet but it is widely acknowledged that it is something related to Onge, obviously it is a mixed component. Keep being in denial.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusAurelius
I don't know if you're pretending to not understand or just trolling. I already showed you with a genetic study that some Indian tribes have Onge admixture while most do not.
India has the most ethnic group and most sub-ethnic, sub-sub-ethnic groups in the world, there are properly more than 10,000+ Indian ethnicities and most sub-sub-sub ethnicity.
Most Indian people don't even know the names of most of these tribe nor understand their languages and sub-languages, most Indians will know nothing about them and have no interest in knowing and you came posting a random isolated tribe ????? If I have to guess it properly belongs to the Gond tribe and DNA shows they have both East Asian and Onge admixture to different degrees.
Have you forgotten this DNA study ? not all these tribes have pure ASI dna. Do you want me to bold the parts in circle in the blue colored parts to pinpoint the points I've made to you many times before ?
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gn...3/10/roma2.png
@butlerking: stop giving this refried greaser wop the attention he craves.
There's a difference between West Eurasian, ASI , Onge like it shows in the coloring charts but you keep posting tribal people that have significant Onge admixture (although not significant enough that they look like Onge but enough that they don't have pure Veddoid phenotypes and look different in many of them )
Properly he is attention seeker but he is also too ignorant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fractal
Also let met just say..... the genetic chart I posted 100% accurate but it doesn't show the whole picture.
It is guaranteed that most South Asians do not have Onge admixture but there are some genetic variations even within their own tribe/caste but this entirely depends on the history of some locations. DNA may show 80% ASI, 20% West Eurasian with 0% Onge admixture on this tribe/or caste however they may also show Onge admixture within it's own group depending on the region history, this is nothing unusual due to assimilation of other tribes or intercaste marriage but will identify with the same caste and tribe.
Of course the DNA study is accurate, The Green represents ASI which is a mixed component. Those Isolated tribes have a significant ASI component.Quote:
Originally Posted by ButlerKing
Coming from the guy who keeps linking Albino's trying to draw similarities.Quote:
Originally Posted by ButlerKing
Stop projecting your insecurities onto everyone, I know it is hard being a short weak virgin dropout. There is no attention seeking here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fractal
The entire premise is trying to deny Non-Caucasoid admixture with upper caste South Asians.
http://racialreality.blogspot.ca/201...-of-india.html Hate this blog all you want, he uses sources from other sites.
DNA evidence confirms what historians, linguists and anthropologists have long known but nationalists have denied: that Indians are mainly a mix of indigenous Australoids and intrusive Caucasoids. They're composed of two genetic components, one related to Andaman Islanders and the other to Western Eurasians, which is higher in upper castes. The estimated dates of admixture between the two are consistent with the introduction of Indo-Aryan languages from the northwest and probably also earlier events related to the spread of Dravidian languages and even agriculture.