"Proto-Iranians were not Northern Europeans"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MS85

I don't want to insult anybody, but personally as an ethnic Kurd I do respect Arabs much more than Turks. With all due respect but I see Turks as parasites.


Love your friends, but respect your enemies, never undervalue your enemy!

---

>doesn’t want to insult anyone
>precedes to call Turks parasites

Say what you will about Turks, but I have a lot more respect for them then gypsy, wog terrorist trash like you.
Also Anatolian Turks are genetically more aryan than Kurds lmao. So you can stop with the cringe larping.
And like a drooling retard you claim BMAC was aryan (it wasn’t) and Andronovo was ‘mongoloid’ (yeah nothing screams chink like high frequencies of blonde hair and blue eyes LOL) when in fact BMAC samples from Gonur Tepe had very high amounts of mongoloid west Siberian admixture! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by meson

Can you prove my statement wrong in a civilized way (instead of trolling)?

---

Khvalynsk was 75% EHG. Europeans do have CHG(nothing from Iran or post neolithic Anatolia outside of southern Euros), but the CHG side of the ancestry of PIEs wasn't Proto-Indo-European because it was all female mediated. There is no R1 at all in any pre Indo-European invasion Middle-East/Caucasus or MENA HGs, it's all in N. Europe. Even ignoring the archeological records and historians, that is enough evidence PIE had nothing to do with the populations of the Caucasus and below.

To the butthurt Natufian who thinks he's something other than what he is because one of his ancestors forced the majority of his ancestors to speak a foreign language and calls Mongoloids "uncivilized": those "uncivilized" Mongoloids literally dominated your shitty slum of a region for the entire middle-late Medieval period, a period your region still hasn't evolved out of.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Token

No such thing as Iranic identity today, your 'Iranic identity' was wiped out by Arabs and their Islam. You guys utterly failed at preserving the beautiful culture that Northern Europeans gave you.

---

Fucking retard constantly obsessed with Iranians. You deserve all the shit you get on this thread for parroting about pseudo EUrOPEAN ArYAN superiority. You really need to stop whining and bitching about this.

While I don't agree with some of the bullshit MS85 is posting, you are no different bashing Iranians on every single thread and degrading their identity. Considering you worship a Semitic Jew who resembled more like an Arab, you arent in any position to bark about Iranians "failing" to preserve their culture. With that said, Northern Europeans have nothing to do with Proto-Iranics nor do they have any claims on Iranian culture and Iranic identity. You have zero affinity to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fibonacci

Don't feed me that shit, if I had the option to go back in time and wipe out those ass backward sand monkeys and muhammedans from destroying and shitting in Iranian culture, I would. I wasn't born under islamic culture nor do I welcome it. Im not named after muslim animals and pedophiles nor do I follow any of their ideologies.

Northern Europeans and eastern Europeans lost their paganism to another Semitic trash from the deserts of israel. You're all in the same boat

---

Lol why are you falling for his bullshit? Nobody destroyed Iranian culture nor the Iranic identity, not even arabs. Iranians have always remained as Iranians for centuries.

So traditionally Kalashes are remnants of not mixed ancient proto Iranics?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lukasz

So traditionally Kalashes are remnants of not mixed ancient proto Iranics?

---

You tell me:

https://pobierak.jeja.pl/images/a/c/...73_kalasze.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lukasz

So traditionally Kalashes are remnants of not mixed ancient proto Iranics?

---

They are not in any way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Babak

Fucking retard constantly obsessed with Iranians. You deserve all the shit you get on this thread for parroting about pseudo EUrOPEAN ArYAN superiority. You really need to stop whining and bitching about this.

While I don't agree with some of the bullshit MS85 is posting, you are no different bashing Iranians on every single thread and degrading their identity. Considering you worship a Semitic Jew who resembled more like an Arab, you arent in any position to bark about Iranians "failing" to preserve their culture. With that said, Northern Europeans have nothing to do with Proto-Iranics nor do they have any claims on Iranian culture and Iranic identity. You have zero affinity to them.

---

Actually most people seems to agree with me here, including 99% of the top tier global scientists. Only you pseudo-nationalist Iranian retards are whining about it. Sadly, as most West Asians in real life would be quite proud of having some European ancestors considering how submissive they are to Europeans.

In end of thread I concluded Northern Europeans were Proto-Iranians, Yamnaya 44% Iranian Chacolithic and it going to Corded...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Token

Actually most people seems to agree with me here, including 99% of the top tier global scientists. Only you pseudo-nationalist Iranian retards are whining about it. Sadly, as most West Asians in real life would be quite proud of having some European ancestors considering how submissive they are to Europeans.

---

LMAO, How many scientists do you know by name, 2?

You can try whatever you want, but nobody is in a position to rewrite history and reconstruct history according to your fairy tales in this age of technology


The Armenian hypothesis of Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov has been proven right.


If ARYANS in West Asia were submissive why did Churchill bombed Kurds with chemical weapons?