The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2,000-year archeogenomic time transect

About the three ancient Egyptian mummies:

Quote:

---

The trio was named JK2134, dating from 776-569 BC, JK2888, estimated to have lived around 97-2 BC, and JK2911, from 769-560 BC.

The mummies came from an ancient Nile community known as Abusir el-Meleq. Scientists observed that their ancestry more closely resembled that of modern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern individuals than that of modern Egyptians.

Their complexion is believed to have been light brown, with dark hair and eyes and no freckles. "These results are very consistent with the findings of Schuenemann et al that 'ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times' and that they had an allele for lighter skin," Parabon NanoLabs said in a press release.
https://www.infobae.com/america/cien...-de-2000-anos/

---

There may be a large number of Near Easterners that are actually of North African provenance and this overlapping or being overlapped or do they need more time or more samples as they always say to find out?

What is clear is that North Africa has there in both the Etruscans and Rome and you are not going to hide or hide it any longer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel

Today started another thread showing, that some still have a hard time to deal with that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Token

That blond and red hair come from Indo-Europeans is hardly debatable. The earliest carriers of the presently most prevalent red hair genes all come from IE steppe cultures. The earliest blond individual is the fully ANE Afontova Gora 3 from southern Siberia.

---

Very old post,but

Lol, what you guys are smoking.

Blonde and red hair sure are from ANE,but this dosent mean all Ane carried it,MA1,AG2,AG1,Yana RHS don't carry it,only 1 sample AG3 carries it

Also,blonde and red hair were found in Scandinavian hunter gatherers,among Baltic hunter gatherers,among globular amorpha and funnelbeaker farmers,among Balkan farmers much before indo Europeans first appearred.

Indo euroepans despite having ANE and ehg Ancestry dont show blonde and red hair,the simple answer is some ANE and some EHG had blonde and red hair which they contributed to the globular amorpha farmers,To Scandinavian and Baltic hunter gatherers,but the ANE and EHG Ancestry among yamnaya/proto corded ware didnt carry blonde or red hair.

Stop making up lies.
Yamnaya,the indo Europeans with purest indo european Ancestry and no farmer admix,lacked blonde or red hair,while corded ware and Bell beaker show blonde and red hair in a minority,due to farmer admixture of 10-30%

Same with many western Russian EHG,they lack blonde and red hair alleles,Same with karelia EHG,they lack it too.
Only 1 EHG sample from samarra shows it,the later Scandinavian and Baltic HGs from kunda and narva culture show it,they also contributed Ancestry and light hair to Scandinavian,Baltic and polish farmers (funnelbeaker and globular amorpha)

They are the source of blonde and red hair in modern Europeans,original indo Europeans were black haired,brown eyed and swarthy.


Globular amorpha and funnelbeaker farmers were white looking,european maternal ancestry and Phenotype comes from them.


There was one iranian neolithic farmer from 7000 bc wezmeh cave that had 0.2 Out of 1 frequency of blonde hair,Some chg and iranN will have blonde and red hair too due to some blonde kind of Ane Ancestry.
But this dosent mean all of them will carry it.

Not even All ANE carried blonde or red hair.
Native Americans are 30% ANE and they don't carry it.


Token,you cope so hard,lol.