Tribecode gives me I2a1b3a and does not give me that exact CTS10228 subclade?!
Printable View
That means it tested all the way to I-L621 level and didn't test for CTS10228 which is its subclade ;)
EDIT: if you'd like to test further and don't want to do Y-DNA37 at FTDNA or Y37 at YSEQ, I would consider the YSEQ I2a-M423 SNP Panel which will test even below CTS10228, but mind that most likely you will fall somewhere below it.
Tosks haven't tested much, there are barely few at ftdna. The scientific studies we have seen so far do suggest that CTS10228 and R1a are well represented among them. Now if that was a sample bias, can't really say, and it might not be because there are few studies that basically reported almost exactly the same thing. Of course to really know in which region in the south they peak or are more represented we need Tosks to start testing through our project - the only way we can get to the bottom of it so we don't have to rely on few scientific studies (like we have done with Ghegs so far).
You were singeling out Skrapar, Laberia: Two fellas who have tested from there, Geni and another guy at 23andme, are R1b and related to me and other Albanians. So it doesn't look like Skrapar was one of their settlements, no I2a or R1a from there as of yet.
Trojet, duke diskutuar mėsohet, sidomos kur ke tė bėsh me kėta lloj ekspertėsh.
Nuk pres qė ē'do person tė testohet gjenetikisht, mbase nė njė tė ardhme mund tė jetė diēka e detyrueshme nė letėrnjoftimet e ē'do personi, mbase.
Unė mendoj se ju jeni personi mė i pėrgatitur pėr problemet gjenetike nga shqiptarėt, kėshtu qė po shfrytėzoj rastin qė tė pyes disa gjėra.
Nga eksperienca juaj, sa mund qė tė jetė numri i shqiptarėve nga Jugu qė janė testuar nė kėto projektet e mėdha? Pėrafėrsisht nėse nuk ke njė shifėr tė saktė.
A ka ndonjė informacion se nga cilat zona tė jugut janė kėta njerėz dhe nė cilat zona ėshtė mė i lartė pėrqėndrimi i kėtyre haplogroupeve?
Ne jemi duke diskutuar pėr kombe dhe grupime etnike. Shkenca qė merret me kėtė punė ėshtė Historia. Nė dijeninė time asnjė historian serioz nuk merr nė konsideratė gjatė punės sė tij gjenetikėn. Ke ndonjė shpjegim pėr kėtė?
Faleminderit.
Yes that is exactly why i pointed out things like this. Also we know Hercegovina is hot spot with sometimes 70% and its not same as most of Dalmatia as it is shown here.
I am not trying to discredit Eupedia, just give them a motivation to make more accurate maps and update their old ones. Details like this are very important.
After all this thread is opened because of detail like that, which seem to be incorrect.
Duhet qė ta lexosh me vėmendje atė pjesėn e Skraparit. Njihet qė nė Skrapar ka pasur Sclavonia. Po tė shikosh hartėn gjeografike, ėshtė ky zinxhir malesh nga Skrapari nė Opar, janė pak a shumė e njėjta zonė. Unė thashė qė njė pjesė e kėtyre sllavėve u mblodhėn nga bizantinėt. Pėrderisa Muzaka pėrmend sllavė nė Opar, dhe ne e dimė qė ata janė sllavė tė asimiluar, dhe nuk pėrmend nė Skrapar, do tė thotė qė kėta tė Skraparit duhet tė jenė larguar nga bizantinėt. A kanė mbetur disa? Po mė pyete mua qė e njoh disi atė zonė unė them po. Tani me dy veta qė thua ti qė janė testuar, ēfarė pėrfundimi mund tė nxjerrėsh?
Kronikat historike nuk jane gjithmone te verteta, duhet m'i marr pak me rezerve. Ata dy te testuarit normal qe nuk e vertetojne se nuk ka sllav te asimiluar aty, kete pune vetem ata vendasit aty mund te spjegojne me mire se si eshte situata atje, por deri diku e tregojne qe ai vendanim aty eshte i banuar me Shqiptare; sepse Geni eshte R1b-BY611 si une, edhe ai tjetri ne 23andme duhet te jete po i kesaj linje, qe eshte linje shume e perhapur nen Shqiptar, si ne Gege ashtu edhe nen Toske, Arberesh dhe Arvanit.
Nuk ka njė memorie historike te popullsia pėr kėtė gjė. Pėrderisa as Muzaka qė nuk e pėrmend, do tė thotė qė janė larguar. Por po ta pėrsėris, njė farė influence duket me sy. Nė historinė e Shqipėrisė, pėrmendet si skllavonia pėr thuhet qė u grumbulluan nga bizantinėt dhe u dėrguan diku tjetėr, nė Azi ka shumė mundėsi.
Ajo eshte evidente per sa kame pare une, me Tosket te testuar qe kame komunikuar nuk e ndjekin prejardhjen e tyre me large se deri tek katragjyshi. Mundet te jete vendanim i perzier, nuk e di as nuk mund ta them qe eshte per momentin kur gjenetika e tregon te kunderten.
In the defense of Laberia, I have yet to see a Lab I2a result. all studies have been on tosks(not Labs) so far
I1 in Ghegs is more common than I2a.
I'm guessing labs been very isolated.
They look like J2b2 and EV 13
They look darker than regular Tosks.
Seriously, you have a theory?????
This is a great news Scholarios. Well, hope you will elaborate this theory.
BTW, is this your theory in accordance with the theory of your prefered author Hammond, or is time to declare Hammond idiot like all the authors from antiquity until middle XX century?
Well, Albanians are autocthonus in Epir.
What is this Kurveleshiote?
What's the opinion of Hammond about this?
You remember last time when you disappeared from the forum, using an Albanian expression, like the pee of the chicken? We discussed exactly this topic and you failed.
Actually all of it including all autosomal dna tests are a joke. Its like you write a book about your whole life and someone tries interpreting it by reading only one word per page. At best two words per page. Onless you pay a lot of money and have a geneticist explaining everything in detail i see it as a waste of time and money. Having fun with it its all good but taking it to heart its a waste. Which is why i lost interest awhile ago.
Laberia - you really demonstrate that the low IQ of Balkan people is not a matter of genetics or nutrition or lack of schooling - but just sheer willpower . You have to * want * to be as retarded as you act. There is no other explanation for someone to be so proud of their own obnoxious ignorance.
Now please, stop quoting me. I'm satisfied that you took the bait over and over in this thread, but you can go back to selling marijuana in Italy , you shiftless lowlife.