Buddhism crimes against humanty, the world and against Christians, Muslims, Hindu's ect

Buddhism originated from India and spread to the central and eastern world. Buddhism teaches peace and non-violence; Avoid killing, or harming any living thing and those are the most important core. Buddhism is essentially a peaceful tradition and encourages peaceful co-existence on every human being on earth. However.... if we look at history we've seen the enormous crimes it committed against other people in the world. The monks from Sri Lanka, Burma, are radical and violent. Monks from China were martial artist killers, the monks from Japan also worked as assassins historically. Tibetan monks were conquerors who sold people as slaves for their economy.

Sri Lanka's Buddhism government

Genocide and rape against thousands of Tamils. 100,000+ killed overall (estimate). 800,000 displaced at peak in 2001[16]

http://www.claritypress.com/sitebuil...16-400x600.jpg

Tibetan empire

" Ruled and controlled a territory stretching from modern day Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma, China, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan "

" They sold the people in the regions they ruled as slaves "

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...0s-790s_CE.png

Burmese Junta

Burmese empire violent invasions to Southeast Asia and India. Violent and racism.

The UN who interviewed the Rohingya victim claim 52% of all Rohingya refugees surveyed were raped"
" Other studies shows one in three of the Rohingya women were raped "

http://www.dhakatribune.com/assets/u...titled-1-8.jpg


Bhutanese military Buddhism

Bhutanese invasion of Sikkim, Nepal, parts of India. Many Bhutanese slaves during this period originated from Sikkim and the Assam Duars, objects of repeated raids by Bhutan over the centuries.[15][16][17][18][19] A large number of these slaves were pressed into military service, and some went on to fill high posts in the Bhutanese armed forces.[20][21][22]

Many Bhutanese slaves during this period originated from Sikkim and the Assam Duars, objects of repeated raids by Bhutan over the centuries.[15][16][17][18][19] A large number of these slaves were pressed into military service, and some went on to fill high posts in the Bhutanese armed forces.[20][21][22]

Violent and racists. 100,000 people displaced. 156 rape victims including dozens of gang rapes against Nepalese. YES.... these crimes committed by the peaceful Buddhists with origins similar to Daila lama's Tibetan.

Nepalese refugees, their is the Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, , Dalits and Burmese mix

http://www.refugees.org/assets/image...es-vermont.jpg
http://www.topnews.in/files/Bhutanese-Refugee.jpg



Japanese Martyrs and WW2


Martyrs of Japan, hundred thousands of Christians killed including hundreds of European Christians.

" During World War II, almost all Buddhists temples strongly supported Japan's militarization.[24][25][26][27][28][29] "
"Almost all Buddhist temples strongly supported Japan's militarization and expansion overseas "

Crimes ? Rape of nanking, murder of 20 million people in Asia. 200,000 comfort women. Mass rape of many thousands of thousands Chinese women, Korean women rape many thousands of women Russian women, Timorese women and hundreds of Dutch women.

http://i.imgur.com/J7e31sn.png

Actually about the attrocities of Burma. If you think what they did to Rohingya is horrible than read this.

There were three Burmese invasions of India's Assam between 1817 and 1826

Atrocities

In Buranji-vivek-ratna, Maniram Dewan, an eyewitness writes:[19]

"...in attacking the house of a rich man, would tie him with ropes and then set fire to his body. Some they flayed alive, others they burnt in oil and others again they drove in crowds to village Naamghars or prayer-houses, which they then set on fire... It was dangerous for a beautiful woman to meet a Burmese even on the public road. Brahmans were made to carry loads of beef, pork and wine. The Gosains were robbed of all their possessions. Fathers of damsels whom the Burmese took as wives rose speedily to affluence and power. The Burmese garrison commander Maha Thilawa's troops committed atrocities. The population of Assam was greatly reduced by 2/3 and 1/3 of the men and boys were killed during this period. "


Also the original people of Arakan was India until Burmese and murder and massacre. Muslims and Hindus were in Arakan before the Burmese Buddhist came.

"The British historian Daniel George Edward Hall stated that "The Burmese do not seem to have settled in Arakan until possibly as late as the tenth century AD. Hence earlier dynasties are thought to have been Indian, ruling over a population similar to that of Bengal. All the capitals known to history have been in the north near modern Akyab".[96]


If they were such peaceful people why did the monks supported them to create a empire to invade India, Bhutan, Tibet South east Asia? The Burmese monks ordered their soldiers to invade other countries; sell the people as slaves and loot their resources.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...%281580%29.png

Why are you shocked about satanists' deeds?
It is obvious, that satan worshippers will do his will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel von Rethelsky

Why are you shocked about satanists' deeds?
It is obvious, that satan worshippers will do his will.

---

You must have watched a couple of these videos before.

Personally I find it bullshit and finish all any of those videos. Indians knows the real way Buddhism the problem are the other countries who tarnish it's image. Outside of India.... there's not Buddhism country that doesn't promote violence. Their mouth says promote peace and unity but their actions are always violent, demonic when they want to be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2InzkXO3Bc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

You must have watched a couple of these videos before.

---

No, I didn't. It is enough to know couple of their basic teachings.

Real Asian Buddhism has very little in common with the New Age hippie Western kind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEZTaF__Ihs

Dali Lama pleaded to the world for peace and compassion -- a Tibetan Buddhist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEZTaF__Ihs

Dali Lama pleaded to the world for peace and compassion -- a Tibetan Buddhist.

---

Only because he was kicked out of China. Even if the Chinese din't invaded the Tibetan treated monks as the top class elites, where as landowners can own as many slaves as they want. Daila Lama ancestors lived like kings and exploited the weak and poor as slaves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Only because he was kicked out of China. Even if the Chinese din't invaded the Tibetan treated monks as the top class elites, where as landowners can own as many slaves as they want. Daila Lama ancestors lived like kings and exploited the weak and poor as slaves.

---

I don't buy the poison in your bitter pill. It might make me sick. As a religious and spiritual person, I should say that there's too much finger pointing among religious people. I've seen it in this forum more than once.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop

Dali Lama pleaded to the world for peace and compassion -- a Tibetan Buddhist.

---

Stupid is the one, who believes a satanist...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Only because he was kicked out of China.

---

His true face is totaly different as he pretends.

Quote:

---

Even if the Chinese din't invaded the Tibetan treated monks as the top class elites, where as landowners can own as many slaves as they want.

---

Slaves are the minor problem.
They created probably the most awefull sociaty possible.
Two most disgusting things, were institutional homopedophilia in plenty of buddist
co called closters, and the murdering of female children plus forced nadrogyny...
they fall as low as it is possible, and this guy above is a representation of all of it
(I am not even talking about institutional state satanism and demon cults across
the country which is disgusting and wicked on it's own).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rethel von Rethelsky

Stupid is the one, who believes a satanist...

---

I'm not interested in continuing this discussion for now. It's 3 AM here, and bedtime. If world peace is Satanic, then so be it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop

If world peace is Satanic, then so be it.

---

Peace is not the highest value.
If you want support Satan, then you will be condemned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop

I don't buy the poison in your bitter pill. It might make me sick. As a religious and spiritual person, I should say that there's too much finger pointing among religious people. I've seen it in this forum more than once.

---

Daila Lama's history is more complex than you think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Only because he was kicked out of China. Even if the Chinese din't invaded the Tibetan treated monks as the top class elites, where as landowners can own as many slaves as they want. Daila Lama ancestors lived like kings and exploited the weak and poor as slaves.

---

Dalai Lama's ancestors were just normal people - it's not a hereditary title.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bobby Martnen

Dalai Lama's ancestors were just normal people - it's not a hereditary title.

---

His ancestors created empires, army to invade and raid other countries.

Think what you want about Buddhism i am still founding it as the most peaceful

Dalai Lama - CIA spy. Hitler confirmed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Actually about the attrocities of Burma. If you think what they did to Rohingya is horrible than read this.

There were three Burmese invasions of India's Assam between 1817 and 1826

Atrocities

In Buranji-vivek-ratna, Maniram Dewan, an eyewitness writes:[19]

"...in attacking the house of a rich man, would tie him with ropes and then set fire to his body. Some they flayed alive, others they burnt in oil and others again they drove in crowds to village Naamghars or prayer-houses, which they then set on fire... It was dangerous for a beautiful woman to meet a Burmese even on the public road. Brahmans were made to carry loads of beef, pork and wine. The Gosains were robbed of all their possessions. Fathers of damsels whom the Burmese took as wives rose speedily to affluence and power. The Burmese garrison commander Maha Thilawa's troops committed atrocities. The population of Assam was greatly reduced by 2/3 and 1/3 of the men and boys were killed during this period. "


Also the original people of Arakan was India until Burmese and murder and massacre. Muslims and Hindus were in Arakan before the Burmese Buddhist came.

"The British historian Daniel George Edward Hall stated that "The Burmese do not seem to have settled in Arakan until possibly as late as the tenth century AD. Hence earlier dynasties are thought to have been Indian, ruling over a population similar to that of Bengal. All the capitals known to history have been in the north near modern Akyab".[96]


If they were such peaceful people why did the monks supported them to create a empire to invade India, Bhutan, Tibet South east Asia? The Burmese monks ordered their soldiers to invade other countries; sell the people as slaves and loot their resources.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...%281580%29.png

---

Burmese were one of the MOST VICIOUS and MOST GENOCIDAL People which ever lived in South-East Asia!!... Their level of sheer, sadistic cruelty is simply incomprehensible for any decent, civilized person!... Just read the official History of their Royal Families!!

All major religions have crimes
BTW,WWII Japan was really evil as hell

Oops double post.

For the most part, I still think Buddhism deserves the title as the worlds most peaceful religion but there are some worrying issues. There have been sexual abuse scandals, worse than the Catholic church, many abandoned or orphan children are taken in by monasteries and are made to be priests in training, SOME have been abused. This has been happening in many South East Asian countries for years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Antikvlt

All major religions have crimes
BTW,WWII Japan was really evil as hell

---

Japan was Shintoist, not Buddhist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkas

For the most part, I still think Buddhism deserves the title as the worlds most peaceful religion but there are some worrying issues. There have been sexual abuse scandals, worse than the Catholic church, many abandoned or orphan children are taken in by monasteries and are made to be priests in training, SOME have been abused. This has been happening in many South East Asian countries for years.

---

You're mistaking peaceful and weak. The only reason they're so peaceful is because of how weak they are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gold-Shekel

You're mistaking peaceful and weak. The only reason they're so peaceful is because of how weak they are.

---

There is truth to what you are saying, but Buddhism at it's core is inherently peaceful and unlike other religions there is no agenda to take convert non-believers to control the masses imo. Same is true for all Dharmic faiths but Buddhism is the most peaceful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkas

There is truth to what you are saying, but Buddhism at it's core is inherently peaceful and unlike other religions there is no agenda to take convert non-believers to control the masses imo. Same is true for all Dharmic faiths but Buddhism is the most peaceful.

---

In a way, it's that lack of agenda that causes their weakness. However, Abrahamic religions all started small but spread quickly and I don't think it can be attributed to violence and a will to control the masses, but rather the masses saw light in those religions at a time when Polytheism ruled the World.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gold-Shekel

In a way, it's that lack of agenda that causes their weakness. However, Abrahamic religions all started small but spread quickly and I don't think it can be attributed to violence and a will to control the masses, but rather the masses saw light in those religions at a time when Polytheism ruled the World.

---

The fact remains that Buddhism was able to spread without the aid of a sword.

Perhaps the most peaceful minded people are simply the most weak, weakness and peace go hand in hand. I dunno lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkas

The fact remains that Buddhism was able to spread without the aid of a sword.

Perhaps the most peaceful minded people are simply the most weak, weakness and peace go hand in hand. I dunno lol

---

You'll find peaceful minded people in all religions, it's just that some religions work better with power and a gun.

Chinese monks developed martial arts for their own protection. China's history is volatile, you see.

Yeah, just the other day a hippie called them gentle and loving, so I gave links to videos, one of which was a Sri Lankan Sinhalese I think they're called, greatly disrespecting Tamil officials, and then the other video was of the genocide against Rohingya in Burma. I am in Cambodia and see the blind followers of this religion all the time such as my bitch managers.

"Buddhism" doesn't seek converts supposedly, but that's because their message is to not care about anything, except cherry-picked things. Freedom from suffering is by not caring, is the gist of Gautama's dogma. The converts to "Buddhism" are indoctrinated kids told to pray to the idols and the shrines of the dead ancestors. A real Christian does not force their child to read the Bible nor anything like that. Only heretics do such things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BARBATVS

"Buddhism" doesn't seek converts supposedly, but that's because their message is to not care about anything, except cherry-picked things. Freedom from suffering is by not caring, is the gist of Gautama's dogma. The converts to "Buddhism" are indoctrinated kids told to pray to the idols and the shrines of the dead ancestors. A real Christian does not force their child to read the Bible nor anything like that. Only heretics do such things.

---

I don't buy it. Your statement doesn't seem to ring right :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Armenian Bishop

I don't buy it. Your statement doesn't seem to ring right :confused:

---

It's free, so you don't have to buy it, and you gave no logical reason to deny it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BARBATVS

It's free, so you don't have to buy it, and you gave no logical reason to deny it.

---

The contexts that it was phrased in makes me question it. It looks oversimplified, not withstanding that in a Forum like this brevity is appreciated. So, I was brief and blunt. In the first place, I don't see anything wrong with giving encouragement to read scriptures, Europe is no stranger to creating learning environments for Biblical immersion. It seems that you're more interested in debunking them, than to empathize with them, or understand them.