Kind of curious about people's results. :p
https://s1.postimg.org/1t6w3kwwkf/Untitled.jpg
Printable View
Kind of curious about people's results. :p
https://s1.postimg.org/1t6w3kwwkf/Untitled.jpg
I actually seem to prefer these over my 23andme results :) ...:
https://i.imgur.com/RuYVve7.jpg
***
in comparison to my 23andme breakdown as shown here:
https://i.imgur.com/m4jAv3S.jpg
lower NE-Asian and South Asian on 23andme in comparison, which FTDNA detected much more effectively IMO it appears
thus I found FTDNA's myOrigins v2.0 to be the overall most informative bang for your buck commercial test out there based on my own personal viewpoint! whilst Ancestry.com on one hand gave me incredibly wild results: 27% Polynesian & 6% Central Asian ..like wtf
I guess you could say you got your money's worth then! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Shazou
These are the 23andme transfer results. I wonder if it would be different if I got tested with ftdna.
https://i.imgur.com/5kdstnD.png
I would also want to have a test soon, but I do not know which one is more accurate, 23andme or AncestryDNA? Which one do you recommend me?
I'm pretty sure there would be some variation, but should be similar in accordance with your ancestry. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by dimadoe
Which is why I find gedmatch interesting if you want a more in depth breakdown of your ancestry. :P
I would say 23andme for beginners; it is roughly $99 USD for just a ancestry report; neanderthal percentages and basic mtdna and y-dna haplogroup designations. Between the two; I would say 23andme since it has more features you can explore with. FTDNA is better for advanced users who want more in depth views of their haplogroups that can be quite expensive depending on what you get.Quote:
Originally Posted by alexino
The money is not a problem, important is to find all that is possible. For me, 23andme appears with the cost 149₤, and FTDNA 99$. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by de Burgh II
The choice is yours; whatever alternative you feel most comfortable with broski! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by alexino
23andme tends to leave a lot of 'Non-Specific' into your results...like "Non-specific NW Euro", or "Non-specific Euro/E.Asian" etc. What I like about FTDNA is that they assign every portion/piece of your DNA to an ancestral category-component.Quote:
Originally Posted by alexino
But if you don't mind a little non-specific in your results then 23andme is probably still the best single company available overall for most people-especially for newcomers as well; they seem to have very rigorous standards to their testing methodologies and are very Euro-centric in general or so I've heard. They for instance are the best test out there for assigning Iberian ancestry in anyone as far as I'm concerned. They also have a very large forum community on their site where you can discuss DNA, interact, and share ideas/thoughts.
If you're mostly only interested in the Gedmatch calculators apart from the GedrosiaDNA ones(which is optimized for 23andme V4 data), then you're probably best off going with FTDNA or Ancestry.com as 95% of the calculators there are optimized for FTDNA/Ancestry.com raw datas with the higher genotyping rate and all.
Waiting for my result. I’ll post it when it arrives!
thankQuote:
Originally Posted by Ulash
..
Mine are really inaccurate. I barely score Jewish diaspora (14%), barely score any levantine (6%), I don't score Iberian at all but I do score 22% Anatolia (doesn't appear on any other test). My ancestors never even lived among the ottoman empire territories to score that amount of asia minor. Other tests were more accurate for me (even gedmatch knows better and every different test on gedmatch gave me different results). They also gave me excessive north african score (24% Amazigh vs 16% on every other test alive, on gedmatch it's maximum 13%). But I did understand that the asia minor problem is common.. Wired.
bro, approximately what time in history are we looking at here?Quote:
Originally Posted by de Burgh II
https://s8.postimg.org/xhoijn12d/ftdna_jingo.jpg
%96 Asia minor
%3 South-east Europe
%<1 Sephardic
95% Europe
- 84% East Europe
- 8% Finland
- 3% West and Central Europe
4% Siberian
Trace results: West Middle East, North and Central America
I understand, that ye are horny about your results.
I understand to post it once, twice, even thrice...
but 100th time it is really allready deadly boring. :bored:
Everybody knows, that everyone is mixed and has
some idiotic totaly irrelevant percentages. There is
really no need to post it every week on, and on, and on...
A Greek result from Thasos I found:
Southern Europe 49%, Asia Minor 35%, Eastern Europe 16%
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...GR_Thassos.PNG
mine
https://i.imgur.com/mxtScvZ.png
Grandmother
https://i.imgur.com/jbphOo8.png
Soon my mother's results will come in, and my uncle's YDNA.
MyOrigins 2.0
West and Central Europe 50%
East Europe 20%
British Isles 16%
Iberia 9%
Whats funny is that MyOrigins 1.0 gave me 100 central euro and nothing else, which I believe was incorrect.
dear vascontelo,Quote:
Originally Posted by Vascontelo
can you expand your results ;
you just press expand
european 46% how much % of is west central europe ?
how much % of it is east europe ?
how much % of is iberia
kind regards
adam
p.s
you know your y haplogroup ?
Hi,sure:Quote:
Originally Posted by kingjohn
https://s14.postimg.org/sn69e7kbz/ftdnare.jpg
And sorry, i don't know which is my Y haplogroup.
Just as a funny thing, i have more askenazis matches than sephardic matches in family finder and gedmatch.
thanks
cool results:thumb001:
are you planning to do y dna test in the futuer ?
it is the only part missing in your passel :)
kind regards
adam
63% British Isles
22% Scandinavia
13% Southeast Europe
traces: Northeast Asia, West Africa
Where do you find the info needed on ftdna to use this predictor?Quote:
Originally Posted by *****
Ftdna don't test for Ydna snps in their autosomal test as they do Ydna testing as a separate product, so in other words you can't use it. Have you done MyHeritage?Quote:
Originally Posted by Senpai
Only the raw data from my FTDNAQuote:
Originally Posted by Kelmendasi
Then it won't workQuote:
Originally Posted by Senpai
Figured,thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelmendasi
I'm waiting for some of my far relatives to take the y-test, considering we are descendants of the same male ancestor, but if that doesn't happen, i'm going to buy the test probably to the end of this year. You have to know that 9 of 10 males in my country are R-M269 so i think there is a very little chance to have a "jewish" Y haplogroup.Quote:
Originally Posted by kingjohn
yes most of the chances you are r1bQuote:
Originally Posted by Vascontelo
but still maybe you would a surprise like e-m81 who knows ...... ;)
:picard1:
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel von Rethelsky
there is always a chance for surprise
mtdna h3 is only 0.9% in bulgaria
yet i have it,
there was 99% chance i will not get it .
same can happen in y dna .....