Printable View
I just saw an email where they report an update of the ancestry in this company.
Not perfect but quite better than previous results, at least for me.
My updated results:
https://i.imgur.com/n6CjjiA.png
https://i.imgur.com/HZ2KAel.png
And HGs have not changed.
https://i.imgur.com/7jScveA.png
I'll upload my Raw Data today then I post here. It seens tgey are good to analyse Spanish DNA. I want to know if my grandpa was more Basque or Catalan.
But if you are not 100% Spanish maybe their estimate will not be very accurate speaking about regions in Spain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafael Passoni
I think 23andMe it´s beter for this issue, they did it quite well with me.
LivingDna is approximately good to sepparate West Iberian/East Iberian/Basque origins too.
I will test my father who is 50% Catalan, but his grandma had a Basque lastname (weird). I have the hair with bulbes of my dead grandparents. I wish test it when it become a reality. But thank you for the advice.
Very generalized
https://i.imgur.com/qimRxK4.png
Your results look pretty good. Mine aren't accurate at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
https://i.imgur.com/JJ62fuZ.png
Also
https://i.imgur.com/8JMe7q0.png
With results above looks like I have ancestry from all over Europe. :p
My older results were pretty bad because I got absolutely no Isles population.
These were my earlier results.
https://i.imgur.com/8hZ7EKP.png
https://i.imgur.com/iCH8NN8.png
https://i.imgur.com/NpjFQDB.png
https://i.imgur.com/ZJcwje8.png
https://i.imgur.com/x0ttSoR.png
https://i.imgur.com/pdVibME.png
https://i.imgur.com/3FxtdeX.png
https://i.imgur.com/9LLyC1o.png
Which are your results without the "group results" option?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
Mines change something changing that option:
Spoiler!
Here are 2 pure Iraqi Kurds. Question is why would they score more Indian than Iranian . What references did they use. Another question why Turks under Central Asian
[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/ppe3qoX.jpg?1[/IMG]
[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/bOOdmml.jpg?1[/IMG]
They still have a lot to improve, they have only been running for a year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoro
Any of us can get more accurate estimates through Vahaduo or other tools.
Looks like the results for Europeans are decent but it would be interesting to find out what references they used for Iranians Indians and Turks to get those types of results for KurdsQuote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
Why Ukraine and Belarus are not parts of East Europe ???Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
Better, but still strange. Why such high East Europe? India? Romania and the Baltic countries together?
https://i.imgur.com/e4cpyQ4_d.webp?m...idelity=medium
Wow! I really liked my results, because they really match with spanish regions my family come from, and also this calc recognized my italian and french origin, very well, and not all others do... I really liked this update!!
Something interesting is I scored 100% South Europe... in the last version I scored 3.2% amerindian as in most calcs I do (between 1.8% and 3.5% depending of the test), and now I scored 0% here... it's not rare if we consider that in some YouDNAPortal new oracles (Tolan for example) I scored between 0 and 1%...
But I must point that this doesn't change nothing about my native ancestry... it's true, and I know that I have AVA/Guaraní ancestors... but probably the new calcs are judging that it's more ancient that what other calcs or the same thought before... and this calc detected my native ancestry anyway due to my maternal haplogroup, which is A2, and it belongs to this folk, so I have native ancestry, and that nobody could argue this fact.
Even though I think I should score native... if not 3%, at least around 1.5% or something like that... but it's ok.
Anyway I liked a lot the update... the fact they think Aragón is the region which I share more genetic coincidences is probably because my main origin is from Valle del Roncal / Erronkari, in Navarra, and the people there could have many mixed with people from Sabiñánigo, Ayerbe and Jaca, towns in Aragón not too far from this place (what do you think about this, Gixajo? You know very well the area, so you know much better, of course ;) ), which is in the extreme east of Navarra.
I really liked a lot this update!!! :thumb001:
P.s.: Regarding Murcia area which shows in the map, I don't know if I have ancestors from there, but I've heard that we had a line from Aielo de Malferit, Valencia... may be it's connected with it.
https://i.ibb.co/FYRXkrL/ADNTRO1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/nk7yG9r/ADNTRO2.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/Rb0jYVC/ADNTRO3.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/Bg9wj0Y/ADNTRO4.jpg
Crees qué tu francés sea vasco/aquitano?Quote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
El mío creo que con toda seguridad...
Supongo que sí, yo suelo andar entre el 20-25% en estimaciones de compñías comerciales, la mitad de lo que suele dar mi madre, así que parte del Francés deberías¡ ser del suroeste, en gran medida vasco, hasta llegar a ese 20-25%.Quote:
Originally Posted by Erronkari
De todas formas esta compañía está cambiando sus estimaciones continuamente, supongo que todavía no han conseguido la versión definitiva. La mayoría de la gente ve sus resultados bastante malos.
Tú sueles andar en ese componente como mi madre. Parte de lo que asignan a Cantabria podría tambier ser vasco.
One of the worst results I ever got from a DNA company:
https://i.imgur.com/bsxfqSb.png
LOL - 11% Native American? :picard1: You are fully North African IIRC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adamm
Yes, with 23andMe I get 100% NA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterski
E-Scandinavian ??? Cyber Viking? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
A monkey is the Director of Ancestry of ADNTROLL, that's why, LOL:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoro
https://i.imgur.com/9HanrQq.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu7h6iLdO_UQuote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
Zaporozhian Cossack (friend)
Attachment 108628
Don't @ me
Russia=Western AsiaQuote:
Originally Posted by Dirdepo
France=South Europe
As soemone told me in a reputation message, this company is a troll company...;)
:roll eyesQuote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
Serbia is OttomanQuote:
Originally Posted by gixajo
They must mean Turk and Balkan ! But I’m curious what Iranian and Indian references they used where Kurds end up with much more Indian than Iranian !Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas
I see for non-iberians or their descendants this calc must improve a lot...
https://imgur.com/a/1zMv4cw
pretty alright for me
Irony?Quote:
Originally Posted by 17571imre
MH and ADNAntro are the only ones that have brought out Native American in me. The only explanation I could find is that he was related to the part of the Spanish nobility that is related to the daughters of Moctezuma.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-78bPngxBU...1283/MAPA.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tMVgQbj5h...5C3%2591A.JPEG
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7NDq10M2L...EARDENTAL.JPEG
https://mxcity.mx/2016/05/quienes-so...tes-moctezuma/
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9qsNX9Bs8...2/america.jpeg
I'd really like to know their methodology
https://i.imgur.com/RbKfyyA.png
https://i.imgur.com/qprwJQh.png
Machismo + AutismoQuote:
Originally Posted by cakmir7y
He mirado la pagina pero pone que hay que pagar 25 pavos... encima de que les cedo mis datos geneticos analizados por otros, ¿me cobran?
So I'm 3.5% Chinese, eh?
East Europe 12.0%
Greek Balkan 11.0%
UK, Ireland & Scotland 5.4%
South Europe 8.3%
Escandinavian 3.8%
Central Europe 3.5%
China 3.5%
The new "Shape" thing:
You are LESS African than your reference population.
You are LESS American than your reference population.
You are LESS European than your reference population.
You are MORE East Asian than your reference population.
You are MORE from South Asia than your reference population.
My father's ADNTRO with his FTDNA file.
They are giving my father and I a small percentage of Native American, in this case Caribbean to my father almost 5%, but we do not have any ancestry from America, how can this be?
The guy got more European than the reference sample, I came out higher, I was already in the green.
We have no ancestry from America, the only thing I can think of is some connection with the part of the Spanish nobility that descends from Monteczuma because almost 5% would be for us to know who it is and we have no photographs or oral tradition about it or it may be some European correspondence with Native Americans and the company seeing the Spanish names already believes can put that result in America, no dear, things are not like that.
What country is the ADNATRO company from?
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...E2ynSIWk=s1308
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...7au3SGRIs=s808
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...iZbH52cV=s1304
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...H7OeeB23f=s540
It was meh for me.
Admixture:
86.7% European
5.2% East Asian
3.6% African
2.7% Native American
1.8% South Asian
This was pretty accurate and matches the other calculators I've used, especially the increased East Asian (for my Tatar ancestry).
Ancestry:
50.7% Russian
16.3% East European
13.4% Spanish
19.3% North European
This seemed so random and bizarre, why is Russian under the West Asian category? And why are Estonian and Romanian in the same category?
The only way I can interpret it is as proxies, ie. Russian is Slavic ancestry, East European is Baltic ancestry, Spanish is Southern European (Balkan) and North European is a mix of Finnic and Germanic, which would match other tests and calculators but it's still such a strange result.
My known ancestry is: 50% Polish, 12.5% Ruthenian (and distant Baltic), 12.5% Tatar, 12.5% German, 6.25% Czech and South Slavic and 6.25% Jewish.
What are your thoughts guys?
I've tried this again with a different upload. Above I used MyHeritage and this one is 23&Me. They aren't too different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley
https://i.imgur.com/afwdke5.png
https://i.imgur.com/t9DHQbv.png
Both uploads couldn't decipher my mtdna.