Genetically, how "much" outlier you are?

In my country, im kinda a outlier, im around 16% less european, 25% more african and 9% less native than the average brazilian (~ 68% EUR/ 20% AFR/ 12% NAM).
In my region, im a bit less outlier, im around 12% less european, 21,6% more african and 9,5% less native than the average northeastern (~ 64% EUR / 23,6% AFR / 12,4% NAM).
In my state, im close to the average, im around 5,9% less european, 8,7% more african and 3% less native than the average baiano (~57,9% EUR / 36,3% AFR / 5,8% NAM).
In my "microregion", im very average, im around 1,4% more european, im 0% more or less african and 1,4% less native than the average baiano from center-north (~50,6 EUR / 45% AFR / 4,4% NAM).

Im also a bit outlier on my haplogroups, the comum in the whole LATAM is have a european Y-DNA and a african/native mtDNA, but my Y-DNA is african. Despite that, my ancestry is pretty average: colonial (Portuguese/Spánish/AFR/NAM) and some recent european (portuguese).

*It is obvious that this is not 100% correct, the estimatives can be a bit distant from reality and my results also change a bit depending of what site/calculator i use, its all a aproximation.

I used the data made by João Limão from a page of genetics from Brazil.
Attachment 145101
Attachment 145102
Attachment 145103
Attachment 145104

My mtDNA is kinda weird and Im a little bit German.

Im obviously a outlier since im mixed but maybe mixed people dont count
I dont think im a outlier for other mixed people

Bump

Probably for the most regions in Russia I am an outlier, though, I do not care. This is God's given Earth, not humans one. I can live everywhere, if someone will stop me, I won't spend my time to break it, I will spend my time to understand how I can serve Jesus Christ in that particular place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mortimer

Im obviously a outlier since im mixed but maybe mixed people dont count
I dont think im a outlier for other mixed people

---

I think you still fall within the range of South European/West Asian variation, but you wouldn’t be particularly close to any specific population because of your high ASI and EHG ancestry.

My Ydna is unusual for a Spaniard, and my autosomal results are more oriented towards the north of the Iberian Peninsula than the average, something logical because of my maternal side origins in the Basque Country.

Not something too exaggerated to be considered an outlier, but it´s something that might put me a little off average.

In my native country, Venezuela, I was an outlier, because I'm much more Euro, less Amerindian and less SSA than the Venezuelan average. Venezuela might be something around 54-58%% European, 28-29% Native American, and 17-18% SSA, while I'm like 86-88% European, 8% Amerindian and 4% SSA.

When I lived in Spain, though I looked as white-European as any ethnic Spaniard, I have some Amerindian and SSA admixture not present in full ethnic Spaniards, and though I must be something like 80% genetically Spanish (50% on my Spanish mom's side and maybe other 30% from my Venezuelan dad, who was predominately European, and must have had significant Spanish background), I also have some distant Italian ancestry coming from my Venezuelan dad, whose great-grandfather was an Italian immigrant, making me 6.25% Italian by known ancestry. So yeah, I was also an outlier in Spain, genetically speaking.

And here in the states, where I'm living (now I live in the Appalachian, in a mostly white area), from a multicultural/multiracial stand point, taking into account how invaded is US nowadays, nobody would be exactly an outlier, but if we go by its mainstream white population that's a different thing. Although I'm very full Euro passing, have very light skin, chestnut hair and blue eyes, and I can reasonably go unnoticed even among white Anglo-Americans, I'm very outlier among them from a genetic stand point, given that most white US Americans are of Anglo/Germanic stock, and tend to be full Europeans, while in my case I have some non-Euro mixture (even not being obvious in my case), and my European background is south European (mostly Spanish and some distant Italian).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Repent

Probably for the most regions in Russia I am an outlier, though, I do not care. This is God's given Earth, not humans one. I can live everywhere, if someone will stop me, I won't spend my time to break it, I will spend my time to understand how I can serve Jesus Christ in that particular place.

---

Брат мој

my admixture is caucasus/northern europe with a slight eastern asian touch, i don't care if i'm an outlier or not

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Usernotfound

Брат мој

---

Хвала лепо брате, Бог те благословио. :orthodox:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tk'es

my admixture is caucasus/northern europe with a slight eastern asian touch, i don't care if i'm an outlier or not

---

If you are 100% Nakh and your genetics are common +/- along your ethnicity, I won't say you will be an outlier theoretically (since practically I do not know information about Nakh people genetics). It is good that you do not care about that, in my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Repent

If you are 100% Nakh and your genetics are common +/- along your ethnicity, I won't say you will be an outlier theoretically (since practically I do not know information about Nakh people genetics). It is good that you do not care about that, in my opinion.

---

i've checked admixture results from vahaduo modern population list among our guys, most of them have the similar output, some have more and some have less

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tk'es

i've checked admixture results from vahaduo modern population list among our guys, most of them have the similar output, some have more and some have less

---

So probably you are not an outlier genetically. It might be a true ethnic make up (results of you and other Nakh people that you've checked) that possibly can make an average for most of the Nakh people, but of course to state that more strongly there have to be more data, but does it matter that much. If you are phenotypically typical fully to mostly for your region / ethnicity and you know by your parents what is your ethnicity and it makes significant percentage of your area then you must be truly a representative of this ethnicity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BabtistJohn

I noticed I am generically closer to older populations of Saxon and the like than modern British people. I don't know if perhaps Australians just have purer mixing due to leaving the country so long ago ago. Could explain why we aren't as ugly and gnarled looking as a lot of modern British folk.

---

I doubt you are Australian. You sound like a sock of a banned self-hating Scot.

I have more North African ancestry than the average person here where I live, at least among the locals, which makes sense since my parents were from somewhere else where that component is more prevalent. But my Y-DNA is far more exotic; it's not common anywhere in my country or even in Europe.

I've had no genetic tests but from ethnic point of view my composition (3/4 Slavic and 1/4 Adyghe) is almost exactly like that of Republic of Adyghea which borders my city. My city is much more diverse and my country is even more diverse, yet they are Slavic in a comparable share too. Such amusing arithmetics.