~Elizabeth~'s DNA Tribes SNP report

http://s19.postimage.org/g873bwiw3/D...Similarity.jpg

http://s19.postimage.org/nmwf4a4rn/D...ental_Zone.jpg

http://s19.postimage.org/71osomdnn/D...ld_Regions.jpg

http://s19.postimage.org/ot0f32t2b/D...ld_Regions.jpg

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Your Estimated Percentage Continental Zone
98.97% European
1.03% Sub-Saharan African
0.00% Native American
0.00% Middle Eastern
0.00% South Asian
0.00% East Asian
0.00% North Asian


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your Estimated Percentage World Region
49.18% Northwest European
20.03% Iberian
18.77% Baltic-Urals
8.18% Caucasus-Anatolian
1.51% Central African
1.51% South India
0.63% Oceanian
0.14% Mesoamerican
0.04% Arabian
0.00% North African
0.00% Indus Valley
0.00% West African
0.00% Southern African
0.00% African Great Lakes
0.00% Southeast Asian
0.00% Chinese
0.00% Manchurian
0.00% Siberian
0.00% Arctic
0.00% Mongolian
0.00% Horn of Africa


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'll list the top 50 (there's more than that)
Total Similarity: List of All Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
1 Scandinavia 0.7161 - Europe
2 Basque Spain 0.7152 - Europe
3 England 0.7149 - Europe
4 Slovenia 0.7148 - Europe
5 Belarus 0.7147 - Europe
6 Cornwall West Britain 0.7147 - Europe
7 Germany and Netherlands 0.7147 - Europe
8 Western Scotland and Ireland 0.7146 - Europe
9 Lithuania 0.7144 - Europe
10 Bergamo Italy 0.7144 - Europe
11 Ukraine 0.7143 - Europe
12 European-American Utah 0.7143 - Diaspora
13 France 0.7141 - Europe
14 Orkney Islands Scotland 0.7139 - Europe
15 Bulgaria 0.7139 - Europe
16 Hungary 0.7138 - Europe
17 Russia 0.7133 - Europe
18 Spain 0.7132 - Europe
19 Basque France 0.7132 - Europe
20 Galicia Spain 0.7132 - Europe
21 Finland 0.7127 - Europe
22 Sephardic Jewish Bulgaria 0.7127 - Diaspora
23 Tuscany Italy 0.7125 - Europe
24 Canary Islands 0.7120 - Diaspora
25 Sardinia 0.7119 - Europe
26 Romania 0.7116 - Europe
27 Poland West Slavic mixed 0.7113 - Europe
28 Kumyk 0.7109 - Caucasus
29 Mordvin 0.7108 - Europe
30 Sephardic Jewish Turkey 0.7100 - Diaspora
31 Cyprus 0.7095 - Middle East
32 Ashkenazi Jewish Europe 0.7095 - Diaspora
33 Chechen 0.7094 - Caucasus
34 Armenian 0.7092 - Caucasus
35 Balkar 0.7090 - Caucasus
36 Turkey 0.7088 - Caucasus
37 Georgia Caucasus 0.7088 - Caucasus
38 Adyghe North Caucasus 0.7084 - Caucasus
39 Kurdish 0.7082 - Middle East
40 Jewish Morocco 0.7082 - Diaspora
41 Jewish Georgia 0.7078 - Diaspora
42 North Ossetia 0.7076 - Caucasus
43 Chuvash Russian Federation 0.7072 - Europe
44 Jewish Iraq 0.7072 - Diaspora
45 Aleut Alaska 0.7071 - Diaspora
46 Abkhazian 0.7070 - Caucasus
47 Dargin Urkarah Dagestan 0.7068 - Caucasus
48 Lezgin Caucasus 0.7067 - Caucasus
49 Iran 0.7065 - Middle East
50 Druze Israel-Carmel 0.7064 - Middle East



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Top three of each of the other regions:

Total Similarity: African Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
66 Libya 0.7023 - Africa
80 Tunisia 0.7004 - Africa
84 North Morocco 0.6997 - Africa



Total Similarity: Caucasus Mountains Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
28 Kumyk 0.7109 - Caucasus
33 Chechen 0.7094 - Caucasus
34 Armenian 0.7092 - Caucasus



Total Similarity: East Asian Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
106 Uyghur China 0.6958 - East Asia
155 Burma 0.6827 - East Asia
163 Thailand 0.6816 - East Asia



Total Similarity: Middle Eastern Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
31 Cyprus 0.7095 - Middle East
39 Kurdish 0.7082 - Middle East
49 Iran 0.7065 - Middle East


Total Similarity: Native American Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
154 Eastern Greenland 0.6831 - Native American
159 Maya Mexico 0.6822 - Native American
161 Aymara La Paz Bolivia 0.6817 - Native American


Total Similarity: North Asian Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
94 Uzbek Central Asia 0.6979 - North Asia
107 Hazara Pakistan 0.6956 - North Asia
119 Yukaghir Russian Federation 0.6934 - North Asia



Total Similarity: Oceanian Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
200 Tonga 0.6746 - Oceania
201 Samoa 0.6745 - Oceania
205 Melanesian Bougainville 0.6700 - Oceania



Total Similarity: South Asian Populations
Rank Population Member Similarity Match Map Section
54 Tajik 0.7048 - South Asia
60 Meena India 0.7038 - South Asia
63 Turkmen 0.7029 - South Asia



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://bga101.blogspot.com.au/2012/0...lysis-for.html

One of your ancestor was probably a black slave 6th or 7th generation ago (so 200 years) apparently :)

Interesting result but what is interesting is the SSA admix. I would not see this strange especially if the person who is an American and has a colonial ancestry, since some of them will no doubt score some SSA. Congrats on your results Elizabeth, your results in general seem to fit the landscape of your ancestry:)

Not many "white" people have a drop of Sub-Saharan ancestry in America, and if so then it depends on what part of the country. People with colonial ancestry from the South or even more recent ancestry there before the Civil War might have some. In the North generally speaking colonial peoples only married other colonial Europeans, and it was rather taboo to do otherwise.


There were no racial laws or laws against miscegenation, but it was certainly frowned down upon to do involve yourself in an inter-racial marriage. A lot of the mixed-raced people did not mix with white people, but just married other mixed-raced people. It depends on what area of the country, and definitely the more mixed-raced an individual the higher the probability their Sub-Saharan ancestry would be overlooked.


Later on there would be racial laws constructed for a time in the 19th and 20th century, so basically if they found you with a drop of Sub-Saharan ancestry in your background, generally 1/64th of a percent, then you were not considered white.

Congratulations on the results Elizabeth, and have you ever scored such Sub-Saharan before on McDonald's or Eurogenes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GeistFaust

Not many "white" people have a drop of Sub-Saharan ancestry in America, and if so then it depends on what part of the country. People with colonial ancestry from the South or even more recent ancestry there before the Civil War might have some. In the North generally speaking colonial peoples only married other colonial Europeans, and it was rather taboo to do otherwise.


There were no racial laws or laws against miscegenation, but it was certainly frowned down upon to do involve yourself in an inter-racial marriage. A lot of the mixed-raced people did not mix with white people, but just married other mixed-raced people. It depends on what area of the country, and definitely the more mixed-raced an individual the higher the probability their Sub-Saharan ancestry would be overlooked.


Later on there would be racial laws constructed for a time in the 19th and 20th century, so basically if they found you with a drop of Sub-Saharan ancestry in your background, generally 1/64th of a percent, then you were not considered white.

---

How much time did it take to write this mate :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by loulou

One of your ancestor was probably a black slave 6th or 7th generation ago (so 200 years) apparently :)

---

The possible scenarios for such a percentage bracketing are many, but the most probable are 1 great-great-great-great-great grandparent and 1 other great-great-great-great-great-great grandparent or two of these.

African-Americans get West Africa, not Central Africa pygmy & Khoisan.
DNA Tribes Central African peaks in San of Namibia.

If this is real, I think it would be from one of my Dutch ancestors.
Probably South Africa Boers.
My Dutch ancestors lived in New York and New Jersey.
I don't know the lines for some of the Dutch wives.

Yes, that makes sense, so this is most likely archaic admixtures connected with the European continent.

I posted this earlier today at ABF:

I have four new RF matches.

All are anonymous but I sent genome sharing invitations to them.

One is a man with mtDNA L0a1b1a1 and his YDNA is I1*. He is my 38th I1* as of today.



~~~~~~~~~~~~
Since DNA Tribes says I have Central African (Khoisan and pygmies, 100% in San of Namibia) I wonder if this guy is a pygmy descendant. And if yes, I also wonder if he is of Dutch (Boer) descent.

edit: found this online:

Quote:

---

Haplogroup L0a is most prevalent in South-East African populations (25% in Mozambique).[3] Among Guineans, it has a frequency between 1% and 5%, with the Balanta group showing increased frequency of about 11%. Haplogroup L0a has a Paleolithic time depth of about 33,000 years and likely reached Guinea between 10,000 and 4,000 years ago. It also is often seen in the Mbuti and Biaka-pygmies.

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_L0_%28mtDNA%29


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I also have 23andme matches to white South Africans and a man from the Netherlands who all have African mtDNA. Seems the Boer men had babies with the South African women there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Elizabeth~

African-Americans get West Africa, not Central Africa pygmy & Khoisan.
DNA Tribes Central African peaks in San of Namibia.

If this is real, I think it would be from one of my Dutch ancestors.
Probably South Africa Boers.
My Dutch ancestors lived in New York and New Jersey.
I don't know the lines for some of the Dutch wives.

---

Yes, but how long was this in terms of your Dutch ancestors coming over here, because I am pretty sure most came straight from the coastal areas of the Netherlands.

Afrikaners and Boers do indeed show minor admix. Usually in the 1% to 2% SSA but often that of a South African nature not West African. This was due to the foundation of the colony in South Africa.One Afrikaner's result show this as well. Having a cousin that seems to have European Y-lineage and South African mtDNA lineage probably make this admix to be real you can be connected to him both through African segments or European segments as well. I think anything from one 1% and above is often real. Especially since the results seem to historically makes sense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Elizabeth~

African-Americans get West Africa, not Central Africa pygmy & Khoisan.
DNA Tribes Central African peaks in San of Namibia.

If this is real, I think it would be from one of my Dutch ancestors.
Probably South Africa Boers.
My Dutch ancestors lived in New York and New Jersey.
I don't know the lines for some of the Dutch wives.

---

You are probably right i didn't read your entire result

Where did you get this tested?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EvilScotsman

Where did you get this tested?

---

I sent my 23andme SNP raw data file to DNA Tribes for SNP analysis.
SNP FAQ http://www.dnatribes.com/snpfaq.html




They do STR testing and analysis, if you order a swab kit, but most people nowadays seem to prefer the SNP analysis.


main page
http://www.dnatribes.com/