Dodecad's K=12 admixtures were calculated. But I never got round to make the East Asian admixture map. It is now done. It combines the values for Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian.
http://www.eupedia.com/images/conten...-admixture.gif
Printable View
Dodecad's K=12 admixtures were calculated. But I never got round to make the East Asian admixture map. It is now done. It combines the values for Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian.
http://www.eupedia.com/images/conten...-admixture.gif
The map is confusing
The darker purple shows more than 15% on average admixture which I believe are Uralics and Tatars.
The next color I don't know whether it's a color for 5-10% admixture or 10-15% admixture. The color in Central Turkey, Azerbaijan.
Macedonia doesn't seem to be affected by the spread is EA admixture in Europe. A certain Greek on this Forum would be pleasantly surprised at this map.
Lol, this map is utter crap. Bulgaria has well below 1%.
Highest Mongoloid admixtures , a Turkish girl posted this she is both in forumbiodiversity and theapricity. I'm guessing that means the purple color in Central Turkey is between 10- 15% East Asian
1. Turk from Southern Mediterranean area/Adana(14%)
2. Turk from Central Turkey/Ankara ( 14% )
3. Turk from Northwestern Turkey/Bolu (12%)
4. Turk from Southwestern Turkey/Aydin (11-12%)
5. Turk from Central Turkey/Konya (9.6%)
M. Ivanova, P. Spassova, A. Michailova, and E. Naumova. "Distributions of HLA class I alleles and haplotypes in Bulgarians - contribution to understanding the origin of the population." Tissue Antigens 57:3 (March 2001): pages 208-215. Abstract excerpts:Quote:
Originally Posted by Twitch
"This is further supported by the analysis of HLA class I haplotypes in Bulgarians. Most of them are also common in Europe. However their frequency pattern in Bulgarians is similar to the South European populations. The presence of some rare alleles and haplotypes indicated Asian genetic inflow. On the basis of HLA class I profile and supported by historical and anthropological data, we suggest that the Bulgarian population is characterized by the features of the Southern European anthropological type with some influence of other groups such as Asians, Turks, Armenians."
As I have said before Bulgarian science are two words that don't make sense together, so if I were you, I wouldn't quote this study.Quote:
Originally Posted by ButlerKing
lol why so negative about Bulgarian scientists? This is about mitochondrial DNA, not autosomal DNA btw. Do you know, there are 4 types of DNA..Quote:
Originally Posted by Twitch
This is the estimated age of east asian like alleles in various people..
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wcb8XKS6Et...a_caucasus.png
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2012/11...ixture-in.html
Overall Asian average in Turkey is 5-6%.
Gedrosia 1.18%
Siberian 1.63%
Northwest_African -
Southeast_Asian 0.37%
Atlantic_Med 24.21%
North_European 58.37%
South_Asian 1.08%
East_African -
Southwest_Asian 1.81%
East_Asian -
Caucasus 11.34%
Sub_Saharan -
I have zero.
although on the map of the area of 2.5-5 percent.
I assume the map includes Siberian as well..Quote:
Originally Posted by SSlava
Well if so then:
1,63 + 0,37 = 2
and you how much of Siberia?
Shouldn't Finns have more?
These maps are based on dodecad V3 calculator.(Except Gedrosia and Caucasus these are based on Dodecad K12b)Quote:
Originally Posted by SSlava
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/autoso..._dodecad.shtml
Interesting. I think the spot with over 15% admixture, is Chuvash, or Tatars.
dv3 is archaic and outdated.. There are dozens of new runs, they should have sticked with k12b like they did caucasus and gedrosia maps..
East_European 34.74%
West_European 39.13%
Mediterranean 18.58%
Neo_African -
West_Asian 4.64%
South_Asian 0.38%
Northeast_Asian 1.12%
Southeast_Asian 0.59%
East_African -
Southwest_Asian 0.82%
Northwest_African -
Palaeo_African -
1,12 + 0,59 = 1,68 east Asian
I don't get it why Western Turkey is brighter colored than Central Turkey as we already know that Turks from Aydin have the highest Mongoloid admxiture on average. Turks from Istanbul and Kayseri with lays In Central Asia have 6 % Mongoloid admixture on average while Turks from Aydin have 11 % Mongoloid admixture.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-7iDFhUObtn...s1600/K12b.jpg
I'm 100 % sure that it's the Chuvashs because I've never seen Tatars in aDNA but Chuvashs are always present in spreadsheets. They have 20-25 % Mongoloid admixture on average more than Tatars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horatio
I was thinking the same thing. Western Turks are actually more Asian than Central Anatolian Turks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky earth
I am very proud that my Nation has most East Asian admixture all of Europe, there are many advantages like having cute girls
http://images.thenude.eu/admin/cover...0-11/11-15.jpg
http://s1.1zoom.net/big0/451/325006-svetik.jpg
^ ^ ^ ^
We need to check out the authenticity of those 'Burberry' clothes! Not saying they're fake though... :rofl_002:
So can someone tell me if ScandoMong's are related to their Eastern counterparts? ;)
Did you do this map yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by ButlerKing
The minor East Asian admixture in Scandinavia is in the north so I assume this is the Saami, and Norwegians, and Swedes with Saami blood.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampire
http://www.eupedia.com/images/conten...-admixture.gif
why kalmykia (kalmuks look totally mongols) have so few east asian dna ?
They don't include recent ethnic minorityQuote:
Originally Posted by bimo
No I didn'tQuote:
Originally Posted by Mr.KnowItAll